Sort of like how Paul going for Nabu's throat could be considered wrong, but he knows it's right so he'll do it anyway. Sort of how the Justice League (and by extension Paul's hero and mentor Alan Scott of the Justice Society) are vigilantes, who break the rules of society in order to pursue an objective they new to be a morally and ethically justified. Isn't it a law now, that when a soldier, or anybody else, receives an order they deem to be immoral, they have to refuse the order? I get that it wasn't a law back then. They really were committing treason. But what Paul is doing now could be called treason too, couldn't it? Or, well, at the very least betrayal, since it's against a UN sponsored group and not against a nation.