He has literally enslaved beings for seemingly eternity. It's not really something people can argue.The fact that no-one has even tried to deny the 'slave-owning' part of that description is sort of hilarious.
He has literally enslaved beings for seemingly eternity. It's not really something people can argue.The fact that no-one has even tried to deny the 'slave-owning' part of that description is sort of hilarious.
Grayven has that biodome on Ceres. Legally not his, but he owns it for all practical purposes. And he has an actual building there, rather than having claimed some random rock as his own.He doesn't recognise the authority of any Earth-based entity to adjudicate claims to asteroids, but by that same token couldn't claim them himself.
Ok this made me laugh.
Aside from Teekl and Doctor Morrow, they're more pets than slaves. And he doesn't really order Teekl or Morrow to do anything, so they effectively aren't slaves. Still enslaved, but not abused because of said enslavement.The fact that no-one has even tried to deny the 'slave-owning' part of that description is sort of hilarious.
You'd have to be contrarian to the extreme to even try.The fact that no-one has even tried to deny the 'slave-owning' part of that description is sort of hilarious.
It... Could tenuously be argued that they aren't people, but construct copies of people whose apparent minds exist on the ring...
Wouldn't that be similar to making an AI based off the downloaded mind of someone dead? If so than they still count as people because AI are covered under the laws Paragon put into place. I'm pretty sure Teekl and Morrow can pass a Turing test, not sure on Fatty and his children, have to look up what a turing test is.It... Could tenuously be argued that they aren't people, but construct copies of people whose apparent minds exist on the ring...
They're you're just enslaving constructs copies of people instead of people, again semantics.It... Could tenuously be argued that they aren't people, but construct copies of people whose apparent minds exist on the ring...
You know Zoat is very depressing how Grayven was just brainwashed like that, if you call that neutral ending I fear to think what you call a happy ending.
And when it comes to Oh El he keeps completely ignoring the so called Orange Dawn that so far at least two time travelers have referenced. One of with Paul has a somewhay friendly relationship with and that has not tried to steal Oh El stuff.
What kind of so called enlightening makes you ignore blatant clues that maybe creating yet another ring corps might not be a good idea?
Granted both Paul and Grayven haven't read comics from the last few years but it basically seems to be summed up as "The more emotional lights are in use, the more you screw over the universe."
How is making an organization that encourages controlled use of the orange light liable to bring about the Orange Twilight? He knows Larfleeze leaves his cave eventually, and those rings he has won't be going away, nor will the central power battery.
If that's the case then he murdered a kitty. No one wants to argue that.It... Could tenuously be argued that they aren't people, but construct copies of people whose apparent minds exist on the ring...
Yeah, the fact that the rich white, slave-holding landowner moniker is being held up on account of points of order concerning whether he owns the land he is exploiting just makes it more amusing.The fact that no-one has even tried to deny the 'slave-owning' part of that description is sort of hilarious.
Like Zoats counterpoint boils down to he isn't a landowner because he is a exploitative robber baron plundering the wealth of the commons.He doesn't recognise the authority of any Earth-based entity to adjudicate claims to asteroids, but by that same token couldn't claim them himself.
I agree on all counts from a rules-lawyering standpoint, that doesn't change my point from the original metaphor taken in context of the conversation. Whether or not his ownership is recognized by legal authorities makes little difference.Lets.
Legally an airship.
Owned by a holding company owned by Dr Robbins.
Owned by the Swiss government, if I remember correctly.
He doesn't recognise the authority of any Earth-based entity to adjudicate claims to asteroids, but by that same token couldn't claim them himself.
Littering.
A public convenience.
Hmmm."This is my cause, this is my fight!
Shine through the void with orange light!
I've claimed all within my sight!
To keep what is mine, that is my right!"
I would like to point out that, even if it did work that way, OL still wouldn't own the land. Tuppence would.Just 'cause you built a space-shitter doesn't mean you own it, as anyone who's dug a latrine while camping can tell you. Turns out that for people ownership is a bit more complicated than it is for dogs.
Technically, the constitutional court ruled that the former government's original takeover was unconstitutional at the time it happened. They were all shot.
Have you even read the thread? A significant proportion of the posters here would love to argue that he "murdered a kitty".If that's the case then he murdered a kitty. No one wants to argue that.
That part is not only the truth, it's America's original sin. I'd draw parallels between that and the fact that almost half the country voted for and was okay with Shitstain Russiaplant MacTinyhands and his literal Neo-Nazis, but I can't be bothered to put the effort in right now.The fact that no-one has even tried to deny the 'slave-owning' part of that description is sort of hilarious.
Yeah, but then they'd be arguing that he didn't own slaves. Catch-22.Have you even read the thread? A significant proportion of the posters here would love to argue that he "murdered a kitty".
Well, it's a weird situation. His problem is that he can't give those slaves up, only kill them with the Sword of the Fallen. Not "won't give them up" or "it would be really painful to give them up", but literally can't. And all the actual slaves - assimilated people - were assimilated by somebody else*; he just inherited the problem. He didn't assimilate Morrow or the Saremite, Truggs and the Ophidian did. The Praexis are just flying appetites, and the Hellwraith is a husk - and even if it wasn't, being assimilated by OL is a fate better than Hell, anyway.The fact that no-one has even tried to deny the 'slave-owning' part of that description is sort of hilarious.
Parallels between America actively endorsing slavery and a rich orange blowhard who got elected for running his mouth?That part is not only the truth, it's America's original sin. I'd draw parallels between that and the fact that almost half the country voted for and was okay with Shitstain Russiaplant MacTinyhands and his literal Neo-Nazis, but I can't be bothered to put the effort in right now.
Have you even read the thread? A significant proportion of the posters here would love to argue that he "murdered a kitty".
Yeah, but then they'd be arguing that he didn't own slaves. Catch-22.
While true, there is a problem:
Precisely. Without Teekle, he's down to owning Morrow, slave singular, and that's no good. Except-
I forgot about the Saremite.
Which is to say, as of now, I am arguing that Paul murdered a helpless kitty, that monster.
He has total control over a set of glowing artificial intelligences formed by destructively scanning sapient beings. I fail to see where a catch-22 comes in.Yeah, but then they'd be arguing that he didn't own slaves. Catch-22.
That's worse.He has total control over a set of glowing artificial intelligences formed by destructively scanning sapient beings. I fail to see where a catch-22 comes in.
Edit: Unless it involves recent ninja attacks...
History tells a different story about who wasn't interested in talking.I mean, yes, just requiring them to raise their own regements and build their own ships might have been a better compromise, but it was pretty obvious that the rich, slave owning landowners running the rebellion weren't interested in talking.