the navigator genetics are inmoral because it fines tune them into a single life path (sure you can have outliers,but lets not lie to ourselves,outliers are just the exceptions that confirm the rule,navigators will 99% default to navigation just like lion craves meat),they are slaved to being navigators by their genetics
Navigators are humans- they have certain gifts and traits, but given some remain in seclusion in their Noble houses or even act as diplomats to other nobles on behalf of their noble houses, they clearly are not slaved to being Navigators(job) either. So no, the genetic trait of being a Navigator(species) is not immoral. Even if they
were slaved to the job because of their genetics, we could remove that thanks to our knowledge and understanding of their genetics. Having a predisposition to enjoy a certain job, does not a slave make. Navigator genetics are not immoral- only the self-destructive copy-right 'protections' on them that necessitate extreme inbreeding are immoral, and we can remove those.
And again, even if there was a gene in there that made them NEED to get that job- which I'm fairly certain there isn't- we could fix/remove that.
Well, what we can do is simply not clone them. If Aurora wants to have navigator children, then sure, we let her. But if she doesn't and want a regular human child then we should allow her that as well.
Edit: If we are uncertain on the morality, we should simply ask someone who went through it if they truly want their children to suffer through it as well.
Cloning is not immoral. And in this situation where necessity is what it is? All we can do is give them the most favorable circumstances possible. Unless we want to intentionally cripple ourselves and risk our future on untested procedures and unconfirmed methods, cloning and raising a large population of Navigators that can then do whatever they wish is our best option. Some will inevitably go into star-travel- but some normal people inevitably go into star-travel already. In a large enough group, certain commonalities are bound to show up. And at least cloned children and a stable population would be reliable and already exist as a confirmed option that would work. Unlike the idea of turning adult humans can be turned into Navigators and then successfully adapt to and use their newfound abilities.
Still, I like your idea. Talking to Aurora and getting her opinion would be a decent idea.
Saying being a psyker is an upgrade is like saying a dinosaur is an upgrade to the modern avian and reptile. The circumstance that allowed the Eldar to thrive don't exist anymore. Just like how Earth isen't as oxygen ritch and warm as millenia past.
Untill the Warp gets fixed being a psyker is an sidegrade at best unless you have plot armor. You can't just lock at the capabilities of something in a vacuum and ignore the circumstance that surround it. Survival of the fittest dosen't mean survival of the strongest. It means survival of those most suited to survive and thrive in their environment and circumstances.
The opposite, actually? Unless you want to imply that dinosaurs are somehow further along the evolutionary tree than modern birds and reptiles. And both Sharks and Alligators have almost not changed at all since those ancient days, so also not exactly the best comparison.
To more directly address your point: We are actively creating the environment in which they can thrive. Psychic shielding, Faith as my Shield, Shielding meanings... we're setting up habitats and environments in which Psykers can and will thrive. So what exactly is your point here? Because I AM taking the current circumstances and environment into account. Especially since our shields are only getting better as we continue working on them.
To continue the computer analogy, we're setting up firewalls and running anti-virus software on the Psykers we have access too. Additionally, Psykers are more powerful computers. They have access to programs and computational abilities that standard humans simply do not have. Navigators even more so. So we've created the firewalls and anti-virus software and hardware needed prevent the issues, and are actively working on improving the strength and versatility of these defenses.
With that in mind... what is your point here?
There is a massive difference between being born with a modified genome because of natural causes or because someone was trying to help you live an improved life and being born with a modified genome because someone like
He Jiankui though your genome would be a good idea.
Are you actively comparing Vita- who fully and completely understands the Navigator genome, developed new and thoroughly understood medical procedures and techniques specifically for addressing the issues involved, and then also had her top researcher Critically succeed on understanding the Third Eye, all for the sake of a girl who was already born and with morals and ethics that we all have seen are good, decent, and trustworthy- to a chinese man who experimented on unborn girls without a full understanding of the human genome and with unknown morals and questionable ethics in the modern day using a single, relatively limited technique?
Are you sincerely arguing that All of the time, effort, and focus that Vita has dedicated into this specific subject is equivalent to a modern day incomplete and questionable effort made by that man? Because I cannot understand how you could be connecting those two as anything but an incredibly potent example in extreme contrast. Because Vita has almost nothing in common with this 'He Jiankui' man aside from studying genetics and... I'm not really sure what else. Maybe trying to cure a genetic disease? I'm not even sure if that is common between them since we have dice and QM confirmation that Vita succeeded.
Besides which, we'd be doing this out of necessity. Again, we NEED Navigators to keep up with everyone else, until our Abacii can match them- which is supposedly a long ways down the Abacus Tech Tree, and we don't have the time or freedom to fixate on that Tech to the point we can get there. Yet. For no, Navigators are a necessity. So we either clone them, get them from someone who has them, or do gene-therapy which has never been tested or confirmed successful. Who knows how much additional Tech we'll need to make it successful?
Cloning: We need Cloning Tech, and then it will succeed.
Gene-therapy: Might succeed as-is, may need an unknown number of follow-on Techs
Obtain from elsewhere: Need a location with Navigators, need to diplomacy successfully, need to repeat every time we need new Navigators, Requires a lot of time to complete the other points
Abacus: Requires an unknown number of increasingly expensive Techs to reach an unspecified 'near the end' Tech before we can rival Navigators.
Are there any things I missed?