Doomed Wombat
Let's go Darling!
- Location
- Dancing on wires!
Ehhhhh that's German, but I believe that's a dreadnought.
In which case probably, we did get the designs for Imperial era ones from the BD.
Ehhhhh that's German, but I believe that's a dreadnought.
What? Really? They changed the name through translation? And I only though german voice actors were bad...That's in German, pretty sure it means Dreadnought going by the pictures.
Made...not to my knowledge.
Looks that way.What? Really? They changed the name through translation? And I only though german voice actors were bad...
No I meant the Astartes Dreadnoughts. It'd be a sad sight if regular tactical marines could beat venerable dreadnoughts.Made...not to my knowledge.
Its the kind of thing Vanaheim would do, but as far as I am aware we only have the Legend and Prophet designs.
We could probably omake a few into existence, but I'm shit at design in general never mind ships.
Oh right.No I meant the Astartes Dreadnoughts. It'd be a sad sight if regular tactical marines could beat venerable dreadnoughts.
1. correctedQuestions not really tangible to the current task.
1. I only want to let @Durin note that the omake lacks the canon tag. Except if I have missed something?
2. Our fleet plan once had the goal of escorting the cruisers and above with 800 to 900 escort class void crafts (between 4 and 12 per cruiser for a balanced fleet). Admiral Sarnow suggestion of escorting Heavy Cruiser with Escort/Light Cruisers instead means that the escorts for those ships should change for the ~50 Heavy Cruisers we have (have planed to have).
2a. The number you once gave us has 8 to 24 escorts planed for each HC and 2 to 6 for each Light Cruiser. What is the advised number of LC for each HC? I guess between 4 and 12.
2b. Would other ships profit from LC instead of Escorts for escorting? I ask because Grand Cruiser and above are escorted by Cruiser already.
2c. Would the LC escorting the HC need Escorts for their escort?
2d. Would Youxia (Armored LC) or Monk (Armored Carrier LC) class be better for escorting HC/heavier ships? Or something else?
3. Would you give us (next or if any turn) the option for Thrant to upgrade Cybots?
Name | Type | Losses | Losss Percent | Remaining |
0.00 | 0.00 | |||
Lander Regiment | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 | |
Fighter Regiment | Fighter | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 |
Naval AA | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 | |
Infantry Regiment | Infantry | 1,863.25 | 2.23% | 81,696.66 |
Siege Infantry Brigade | Infantry | 330.24 | 2.23% | 14,479.64 |
Siege Infantry Brigade | Armour | 171.31 | 1.34% | 12,652.84 |
Light Infantry Regiment | Infantry | 360.53 | 1.49% | 23,891.83 |
Armour Regiment | Armour | 191.68 | 0.66% | 28,672.48 |
Mech Infantry Regiment | Infantry | 772.40 | 2.23% | 33,866.89 |
Mech Infantry Regiment | Armour | 365.00 | 1.21% | 29,682.34 |
Artillary Regiment | Armour | 467.12 | 1.78% | 25,793.10 |
AA Regiment | 576.69 | 1.78% | 31,843.33 | |
Warhound | Titan | 0.00 | 0.00% | 25.00 |
Name | Type | Losses | Losss Percent | Remaining |
Firehawk Assualt Fighter Regiment | Fighter | 0.00 | 0.00% | 99.79 |
Peregrine Regiment | Fighter | 0.00 | 0.00% | 98.64 |
Militia Figter Regiment | Fighter | 12.55 | 0.01% | 123,476.80 |
Sam Battery | Defence | 0.00 | 0.00% | 28.00 |
Heavy Sam Battery | Defence | 0.00 | 0.00% | 24.00 |
PDF Light Infantry | Infantry | 19.25 | 0.55% | 3,498.70 |
PDF Light Infantry | Armour | 6.29 | 0.16% | 3,819.11 |
Sentinel/Goliath Regiment | Armour | 0.05 | 0.06% | 87.51 |
Phase-Tank | Armour | 0.00 | 0.00% | 30.00 |
Power Drop Infantry Regiment | Infantry | 0.28 | 0.09% | 318.31 |
Power Drop Infantry Regiment | Armour | 0.23 | 0.07% | 318.48 |
Power Drop Infantry Regiment | Air | 0.02 | 0.01% | 324.37 |
Helltroper Jetbike | Infantry | 0.18 | 0.05% | 352.67 |
Helltroper Jetbike | Armour | 0.16 | 0.05% | 352.43 |
Helltrooper Scout Infantry | Infantry | 0.30 | 0.09% | 342.82 |
Northern Sentinel Maniple (24) | Titan | 0.00 | 0.00% | 4.00 |
Phase-Tiger Rider Company | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.03% | 11.92 |
Helguard Jetbike | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.01% | 9.97 |
Helguard Jetbike | Armour | 0.00 | 0.02% | 9.96 |
Scout Helguard Regiment | Infantry | 0.01 | 0.02% | 22.86 |
Helguard Drop Infantry Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.02% | 16.91 |
Helguard Drop Infantry Regiment | Armour | 0.00 | 0.02% | 16.88 |
Helguard Drop Infantry Regiment | Air | 0.00 | 0.00% | 16.99 |
Primaris Executation Force | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.00% | 1.00 |
Veteran Inflitration Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.00% | 2.00 |
Inflitration Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.01% | 3.99 |
Elite Heavy Combat Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 |
Veteran Heavy Combat Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 |
Heavy Combat Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 |
Elite Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.00% | 1.00 |
Veteran Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.00 | 0.00% | 13.00 |
Psyker Regiment | Infantry | 0.01 | 0.02% | 35.84 |
Name | Type | Losses | Losss Percent | Remaining |
0.00 | 0.00 | |||
Lander Regiment | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 | |
Fighter Regiment | Fighter | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 |
Naval AA | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00 | |
Infantry Regiment | Infantry | 42,627.31 | 52.18% | 39,069.34 |
Siege Infantry Brigade | Infantry | 7,555.12 | 52.18% | 6,924.52 |
Siege Infantry Brigade | Armour | 3,061.03 | 24.19% | 9,591.81 |
no, but they are more vulnerable against psychic attacks then conventional ones@Durin, 1d4chan says that Pyromancy is best used against light infantry, which lesser daemons seem to count as in this context. Do daemons count as light infantry for the purposes of being weak against Pyromancy in your game?
Hmm.
Do we have any idea what the Magma Wyrms will be targeting?
If it's the Titans, I'd suggest a sally with our Titan-Slaying forces, half our Execution Forces, and whatever other escorting troops Rotbart deems necessary.
If it's the Angyls, I'd suggest biomantic enhancement and possibly exploiting their natural heat for a Grand Pyromantic Choir. And the Sirens. Can't forget the Sirens. Support Sirens with Black Irons if necessary, and possibly Psykers as well.
The generic troops we may just want a general sally.
if you a couple of Master deamonologist alphas led by a Grandmaster, maybe@Durin, can we forcibly teleport the Archangyl to somewhere we want it to be?
you have to say what is sallying and what your targets areLet's permakill an Archangyl.
[] Plan You Came to the Wrong Neighbourhood, Heretic
-[] General Defence
--[] Have an even split of regulars and militia hold the outer defences
--[] Keep all of your elites in reserve to counter enemy elites.
-[] Titan Defence
--[] Deploy all of your anti Titan forces against enemy Titans
-[] Angylic Host
--[] Deploy Frederick, Xavier, Aria, Jane, Jacob, and Lulana to combat any Angyl attacks
--[] reserve three quarters of your Battle Psykers for dealing with Angyls
--[] keep back half of the Hunters to deal with infiltrators
-[] Psyker Actions
--[] 1st and 2nd Pyromancy choirs to destroy angyls.
--[] Tamia and 1st Telepathy Choir will force enemy officers to to turn traitor, timed for the Magma Wyrm attack to cause the most damage.
--[] 2nd Telepathy Choir to protect friendly forces from telepathic attack.
--[] 1st Divination Choir will make preparations to take full advantage of the Magma Wyrm attack+officer subversion.
--[] One quarter of the 2nd Divination choir to search for infiltrators.
--[] 1st Daemonology Choir to weaken the Archangyl.
--[] 2nd Daemonology Choir to dispel the Titan protections.
--[] 1st and 2nd Telekinesis choirs to Deny the Witch.
--[] 1st Biomancy choir to Deny the Witch
--[] 2nd Biomancy choir to buff our troops
--[] Primaris Execution Forces to fight angyls.
--[] Sirens will attack and consume angyls.
--[] Trolls to raise up hills in front of our walls to soak incoming damage.
-[] Space
-- [] Harass the reinforcement fleet
-[] Other
--[] Sally forth once the Magma Wyrms attack.
--[] Make an attack on the Archangyl during the Magma Wyrm attack with our strongest assets with the goal of giving it True Death.
--[] Make an opening on the Archangyl by clearing the forces around it with deathstrikes.
1. Doesn't Rotbart's n Steps Ahead mean we don't have to pick force distributions since he'll pick the optimal number and composition?
1. You still have to decide on the scale of the sally1. Doesn't Rotbart's n Steps Ahead mean we don't have to pick force distributions since he'll pick the optimal number and composition?
2. What targets would we have available?