- Location
- Berkeley
Also, on the whole bringing wildlife off world front I'm chill with a blanket ban on taking anything to Trust worlds. I would argue for our ability to bring wildlife as part of military campaigns or to any colony worlds we make, at least on a case by case basis.
Honestly though, I see this proposal as working out as two issues pushed together, perhaps by accident. The first issue is exactly who needs to be notified/gets a say in what we're doing when we negotiate with sapient Avernite species. On that front, I'd be fine with the proposal as is, or we could throw the people who are worried a bone and offer them something like the option to have observers in system who can look over deals we make, with the option of flagging them for high council attention. Really, the issue here boils down to if we're willing to take a bit of a diplomatic hit to make others concede us the right to fully manage our relations with the other species on our planet, even though they're not human, as long as they aren't warp-capable. Personally, I don't think it's worth it, especially given our efforts to try and tie the Trust together, so I'm hoping to throw a bone to the groups that are against it.
The second issue to what extent Avernite species can be brought off world and who is responsible for them. The policy suggested is that we can decide, but will be held personally responsible for any outcomes. Honestly I'm not too big a fan of that--I just know that some idiot noble will decide that phase tiger kittens are cute, and that she must have one or something. I would argue that the standards for accountability should include that it's not our problem if they decide to let it in and something goes wrong, and I think that there should be a caveat for us taking all reasonable precautions. However, I think that most of the efforts should focus on making sure our internal controls are up to scratch so this never becomes an issue.
Honestly though, I see this proposal as working out as two issues pushed together, perhaps by accident. The first issue is exactly who needs to be notified/gets a say in what we're doing when we negotiate with sapient Avernite species. On that front, I'd be fine with the proposal as is, or we could throw the people who are worried a bone and offer them something like the option to have observers in system who can look over deals we make, with the option of flagging them for high council attention. Really, the issue here boils down to if we're willing to take a bit of a diplomatic hit to make others concede us the right to fully manage our relations with the other species on our planet, even though they're not human, as long as they aren't warp-capable. Personally, I don't think it's worth it, especially given our efforts to try and tie the Trust together, so I'm hoping to throw a bone to the groups that are against it.
The second issue to what extent Avernite species can be brought off world and who is responsible for them. The policy suggested is that we can decide, but will be held personally responsible for any outcomes. Honestly I'm not too big a fan of that--I just know that some idiot noble will decide that phase tiger kittens are cute, and that she must have one or something. I would argue that the standards for accountability should include that it's not our problem if they decide to let it in and something goes wrong, and I think that there should be a caveat for us taking all reasonable precautions. However, I think that most of the efforts should focus on making sure our internal controls are up to scratch so this never becomes an issue.