- Location
- Maryland
sigh...
'Best Excessive use of Pyrotechnics' should totally be an Academy Awards category
The category exploded in 1997.'Best Excessive use of Pyrotechnics' should totally be an Academy Awards category, judged on a combined score of Quantity of Things That Exploded for no Reason and Quality of Explosions; rated on a scale of size of explosion, color of explosion, impressiveness of explosion, cinematic framing of explosion, number of people walking away from explosion in slow motion, number of things hurled through the air by explosion, number and quality of secondary explosions triggered by primary explosion, importance of explosion to plot, dramatic timing of explosion, foreshadowing of explosion and of course quality of dramatic one-liners employed prior to and\or immediately after explosion.
I would watch the Academy Awards religiously just for that category alone if it existed.
Before you do that you could go and debug code. That sounds like it would be more fun.You'd have to be some sort of masochist to write a story set in that.
I'll have you know I resemble that remark sir. Go write about lizards!
I'll have you know I resemble that remark sir. Go write about lizards!
Before you do that you could go and debug code. That sounds like it would be more fun.
Do you have something you're trying to tell us MPPI?I dislike the ME universe. You'd have to be some sort of masochist to write a story set in that.
I mean, have you seen the sort of fans that setting has?
Before you do that you could go and debug code. That sounds like it would be more fun.
Goddammit, Derek, I'd almost forgotten about Ada. Now I have to start all over again.I've debugged code in JScript, Ada, PowerBuilder, Visual Basic, SQL, C++, C#, TurboPascal, R...and probably a couple of things I've forgotten. The degree of fun varies rather dramatically with a) the consequences of failure, b) whether or not you're debugging your own code, and c) how utterly batshit insane the programming language is (here's looking at you, Ada).
Writing prose is more fun as long as you're not struggling with writer's block.
The degree of fun varies rather dramatically with a) the consequences of failure, b) whether or not you're debugging your own code, and c) how utterly batshit insane the programming language is (here's looking at you, Ada).
He, it's a human-designed system just like economics, so it must be good, right?And d) how silly arrays are. Looking at you Lua. ("Arrays start at 1! Only they aren't actually arrays, they're hashmaps! But we call them "tables", for reasons. And you can add non-numeric keys to them! And there are two separate "lengths", one that gets the length of numeric keys, and one that gets the total number of elements in the table... Only that's not quite true. Trying to get the length (numeric) of a table is defined as "ome element such that N is a key in the table and N + 1 is not a key in the table" in earlier versions of Lua, and outright UB if you don't have contiguous numbered keys from 1..N-1 in the table in later versions of Lua.)
Goddammit, Derek, I'd almost forgotten about Ada. Now I have to start all over again.
Where do you think I ran into Ada? University of New Orleans, at a time the military had already dropped the requirement for Ada.Back in the 90's, engineering comp sci courses at GWU were taught in Ada...for some reason. The B-school comp sci courses were in Turbo Pascal (which I liked, and I was sad that Delphi never really took off instead of VB and Java). I have never, ever, encountered Ada in the wild, as even back then you had to basically be on a government contract to ever see it.
*tailslap* That was terrible.Needs a more lizardy name, but it scales very well, I believe.
Hands off my tail!
I don't get it. What does a drama about an abused porn star have to do with programming languages?