Big question I have is how this is gonna affect Religion. A lot of people are gonna see it as an Act of God, and there's probably gonna be nothing that can disprove that notion for a very long time.
Act of God, and thus Constantinople and the line of emperors as divine has already started, and it's made converting the natives a little easier, but the Spanish reaction will be honestly amazing, almost as much as the interaction of "We come bringing christ" "We've already got him."
And how would you disprove this as an Act of God? It's an Act of Author, which is basically the same thing (there's a reason it's called Word of God) and so obvious a miracle would be hard to deny.
Just because it was an act of God doesn't necessarily mean the Romans are forever immune from religious criticism. You could easily say that they've squandered their gift if you wanted to slander them. You could even use the miracle to attack the Romans. They were given an incredible gift, and that necessarily implies a greater standard they'd be held to.Act of God, and thus Constantinople and the line of emperors as divine has already started, and it's made converting the natives a little easier, but the Spanish reaction will be honestly amazing, almost as much as the interaction of "We come bringing christ" "We've already got him."
And how would you disprove this as an Act of God? It's an Act of Author, which is basically the same thing (there's a reason it's called Word of God) and so obvious a miracle would be hard to deny.
Just because it was an act of God doesn't necessarily mean the Romans are forever immune from religious criticism. You could easily say that they've squandered their gift if you wanted to slander them. You could even use the miracle to attack the Romans. They were given an incredible gift, and that necessarily implies a greater standard they'd be held to.
remember, though, the sultan covered it up. He claimed to the world that he burnt the city to the ground.The most undeniable act of god in recorded history and it was to foil the Ottoman empire's ambitions, one only wonders how that is going to effect their empire and effect the motivations of their enemies.
remember, though, the sultan covered it up. He claimed to the world that he burnt the city to the ground.
I'm curious how relations with Europe will go because their first interactions will be with Conquistadors and Conquistadors are not exactly the nicest bunch of people, or the smartest, or the most cautious. I can easily see them doing something massively stupid to piss off the Romans.
Would they start sacrificing each other out of desperation?Tenochtitlan being put under siege I imagine the biggest threat to the inhabitants would the Aztec religious practice and its heavy demands for human sacrifices might keep them from trying to wait any siege out for long.
A little fact about the Aztec Emperor, Emperor is technically the wrong term to use, Rather High Priest/Priest king is more correct. Which means the Aztec 'Emperor' is the Pope of the new world in a way. I also wait for the sight of Tenochtitlan to be seen, a city much like Venice yet more expansive and awe inducing. Oh and the fact they cant really attack it easly, any attack would be seen even at night and the bridges leading to the city can be reseeded. The city also is self sufficient giving its floating farms which all in all makes it a nightmare to siege even for anyone.
Well... the Romans are pretty darn Christian so probably something like:
"We told you fornication was bad!"
"Prostitutes bad" goes back to Paul's writings in the first century. There was some debate about if that extends to "all sex bad" or just "sex outside of marriage bad" but thottery is pretty clearly frowned upon from the beginning of Christendom.