I quoted you doing it three times.
dude have fun with this nonsense, I literally just proved you're lying again. I addressed more than a single time, which means you are objectively wrong I only adressed the latest also known as probably lying. But sure, let's look at the three OH SO DAMNING TIMES.
He's used the jackdaw perspective many times though.
here you quote three of my posts. Let's look at them. (not that three is many, mind...)
So let's talk some theory.
The magpie is the biggest threat to literally everyone. Especially the jackdaws. He steals twice, and he launches those thefts while knowing who has what roles and what role types have shiny things (since that's announced at start of night). More importantly though, it's the only role that can win early. It's in our best interest to try to make sure the magpie dies early, unless one is themselves the magpie.
The Jackdaws sound dangerous, due to having multi voting etc, but they... actually aren't. Don't get me wrong, every team can win, but the Jackdaws have a collective two steals per night, and can't coordinate them. Most likely, they'll only rarely manage a steal. The big threat of the jackdaws is the day game, where they have disproportionate influence... but of course if we see anyone lynched 'wrong' we learn that one of the votes on them is a jackdaw.
and incidentally that cluster will probably be mobbed for thefts if the night reveals the jackdaws have shiny things.
The Ravens are the closest thing to a maf we have. They're the next biggest priority after the magpie. They make up 1/4th of the game at the start, and can each steal once, making sure they all steal from a different player. What this means is that going into n1, if the Ravens aren't the d1 lynch, they can simply carpet 4/11 not them players, and then 4/10 the next night, and so on if they keep not getting lynched. This means they're extremely likely to accumulate early shiny things, and will be basically unstoppable if they keep being missed.
We Crows (but of course i'd claim crow, we're the majority) get nine thefts, and nine votes. But we're facing a coordination problem. We can't coordinate thefts, so we're likely to waste a random percent each night, and we can't be sure who even is on our side at each step.
Incidentally, we should look to the wisdom of any crow myslynches, since we can know for sure they were in fact a crow and not some perfidious other bird. Especially if we at some point myslynch comiturtle and he puts out a scum team guess, he's alarmingly accurate. Assuming he's a crow anyways.
I'll be honest, this isn't the kind of theory discussion I'd make post game, this *is* affected by my alignment. That's true whether I'm town or not, but I am not gonna point out a strategy that hurts my team/personal chances if you assume I'm magpie/whatever mid game.
General theory talk, which you pull a three word subsentence out of to claim is me posting from the jackdaw perspective. I didn't explicate this at the time, but since them magpie knows both jackdaws the magpie can at will blanket both of them if it knows they have shiny things to guaranteed gain one. That makes it, objectively, most dangerous to the jackdaws.
I thought about this long before this game was even posted. But it's not me posting from the jackdaw perspective, it's you pulling a single comment out of a lengthy theory post to claim is posting from the jackdaw perspective when it's not.
In fact, it's a point in favor of me being either raven or crow, because, wait for it,
it encourages the jackdaws to hunt for the magpie, turning two of my enemies on each other. At best, you might argue it's signaling my jackdaw mate, if you take it as a given I am a jackdaw, but you haven't argued that, you've argued it as a
perspective slip.
More skilled, generally. Like, I might jump on that grenade were I hypothetically a jackdaw to save eg Broken Base or Pawn, though I don't think any of the players I trust to play better than me is in the game so if I did that I'd probably be trying to throw strong enemies under the bus by implication lol.
round 2. NSMS asked how one would be more valuable. I answered that, explaining how it's a matter of skill and that I might eg shield Broken Base or Pawn if they were in the game and we were both Jackdaws.
Not a perspective slip. And requires you ignore the other people explaining the same reasoning.
like. If I look at this from the false perspective that I'm actually a jackdaw (which, I reiterate, is wrong, but I have no proof of that) then this makes you the magpie. Because you are lying about your reasons, and picking me over people that they better apply to. If I was a jackdaw, that'd ring the alarm for 'magpie who is making after the fact justifications for what they know through role power'. As is, i'd bet on you as either a raven (trying to get towncred by going after a not them group) or a jackdaw yourself (trying to 'come to the defense' of the plan in a way that excuses you pushing a lynch that is... not the plan you are pushing as optimal play, thus creating a situation where you look like you're not fighting the plan while ensuring it fails thus letting you not get a jackdaw lynched).
The already explained case.
there ya go. I have over 30 posts, and of less than 1/10 you can find three... that don't actually involve me posting from a jackdaw perspective. At all. In the first place. Except the third, which is because I was accused of it and that's my standard strat in any alignment for addressing a case that I'm X Alignment. And the others only kinda look like I am if you very, very blatantly strip all context to lie about me.
And, of course, you've continued to ignore me pointing out that I was saying JACKDAWS WEAK before start of game, so me being of the opinion JACKDAWS WEAK is not in any way a surprise twist. Me making the jackdaws sound weak is about the only extent you could have a case, except it requires you assume I had my role before I even signed up for the game.
