Hyacinthium
Writing about sad cannibals as we speak.
- Location
- Bedroom
- Pronouns
- He/Him
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b1b/11b1b8a40c0c5e6478fdd194b308fb3bd0412b88" alt=""
This got me 10 points which I have decided to spend on Heartsong Muses. Also, got a new job. Money will be spent on ethical considerations.
Because we have ignored them for centuries, of course there is no big sign of us able to integrate them and if we want to change that we have to consistently help them now so that we may salvage this situation, most likely integrating them will be harder but that is no excuse to abandon them. If we decide to abandon them what will most likely happen is that they may have to wait centuries more for them to liberate the moon themselves and when that happens, we will have a polity close to us that will definitely not like us.I get that we have OOC information that they would actually join us, but from what we can see in character there isn't much indication that they would join us instantly. After all the ships did not join us even though what we did for them is utterly identical to what we would be doing for the machine intelligences of the CPU moon. It feels somewhat gamey to react to a (minor let us be clear) unfriendly action and a cold shoulder with 'OMG we have been too slow to help our good friends the Automites'. It's like we are helping them because they are good guy coded and this is Mass Effect style loyalty quest at this point.
Just a quibble I have with the whole thing, nothing major, but I thought it would be worth explaining my general 'meh' feelings towards them for what they are and not some kind of overwhelming urge to play realpolitik in the space ferret quest
They don't have warp drives and lifeforce alone isn't going to help them with it, but I see your point.Because we have ignored them for centuries, of course there is no big sign of us able to integrate them and if we want to change that we have to consistently help them now so that we may salvage this situation, most likely integrating them will be harder but that is no excuse to abandon them. If we decide to abandon them what will most likely happen is that they may have to wait centuries more for them to liberate the moon themselves and when that happens we will have a polity close to us that will definitely not like us.
Well that and severely overvaluing the value of just sending a ship and doing nothing else instead of spending points on the project.A significant part of our failure with the Autonites can be laid at not having fucking ships to help them with every turn. No fucking more.
Because we have ignored them for centuries, of course there is no big sign of us able to integrate them and if we want to change that we have to consistently help them now so that we may salvage this situation, most likely integrating them will be harder but that is no excuse to abandon them. If we decide to abandon them what will most likely happen is that they may have to wait centuries more for them to liberate the moon themselves and when that happens, we will have a polity close to us that will definitely not like us.
It's not so much acting idealistic but feeling like we are being taken advantage of. The fact that they are stealing and even attacking us and we are responding with 'sorry we forgot about you, here's some stuff' feels bad when we never signed any obligations like we did with the other civs and they never sent any form of complaint.I dont understand this argument at all - at the start of this quest we took the idealistic nation option and now people are annoyed that people would want us to act idealistic?
It's not so much acting idealistic but feeling like we are being taken advantage of. The fact that they are stealing and even attacking us and we are responding with 'sorry we forgot about you, here's some stuff' feels bad when we never signed any obligations like we the other civs and they never sent any form of complaint.
You are correct. Ethical considerations are not optional. In this case it's definitely fine cause the Aeldari don't seem to care. But what about the next time this occurs. What happens if we stumble unto another peer ftl civilization in the process of being genocided by the Destroyers or the Orks or another hostile sentient race and save them and when the fighting done they demand we hand over our prisoners to be tried and executed for war crimes according to said politys laws? Is it ethical to deny them and enforce our own Justice upon another peer civilization? Is that not something that should be considered?We NEED to sort out those secret projects for the autonites, because if we pump those out then next turn we can jump into CPU moon and actually restart their fucking civilization.
Also for people saying "Well we should have left the humans to the exodites and drukhari," let me provide you three points. Point 1: Practically the exodites have a population in the millions normally, and have lost 70% of their population, as well as having no industrial capability. They CANNOT hold the prisoners. Point 2: The Drukhari are not our friends, weren't even belligerents in the war and were called in as an emergency favour. Point 3: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ARE NOT OPTIONAL. We are a Trek civilization, and if the option is imprison and deal with tens of thousands of soldiers, or leave them to be slaughtered and enslaved we do not have an option, we have an imperative. So stop arguing, because that's a flat out conceit of the Tekket federation.
You're describing a classic Trek plot we'll have to deal with when we come to it. For now we were able to keep these people from being executed, and have some chance of getting them to a place they can atone in some way, which is always going to be the goal of the Directorate in these situations even if there forced to bend in some way.You are correct. Ethical considerations are not optional. In this case it's definitely fine cause the Aeldari don't seem to care. But what about the next time this occurs. What happens if we stumble unto another peer ftl civilization in the process of being genocided by the Destroyers or the Orks or another hostile sentient race and save them and when the fighting done they demand we hand over our prisoners to be tried and executed for war crimes according to said politys laws? Is it ethical to deny them and enforce our own Justice upon another peer civilization? Is that not something that should be considered?
You are correct. Ethical considerations are not optional. In this case it's definitely fine cause the Aeldari don't seem to care. But what about the next time this occurs. What happens if we stumble unto another peer ftl civilization in the process of being genocided by the Destroyers or the Orks or another hostile sentient race and save them and when the fighting done they demand we hand over our prisoners to be tried and executed for war crimes according to said politys laws? Is it ethical to deny them and enforce our own Justice upon another peer civilization? Is that not something that should be considered?
Didn't the Tekkets already almost get wiped out by one ship of Destroyers? Sure they had help, but we shouldn't just assume that these one aren't dangerous. We have a project that says we need to immediately do it for a reason.So, I actually think that not picking the prison for CSM project thisb urn is a valid play. Mind, it's probably a hazard roll, but I think it is a hazard roll with advantage: they are fewx they have all the guns in the system pointed at their ship, which is probably largely turned off and broken. So, like, what can they do? Probably some damage, but I think we have a decent shot of preventing them from doing damage.
Yeah, but it was full force with guard and admech support, not a relatively small group of PoW. At most they might somehow manage to ram our infrastructure, but I doubt they actually could do significant damage barring some shenanigans like nat 1 on hazard and nat 10 on severity, which is unlikely.Didn't the Tekkets already almost get wiped out by one ship of Destroyers? Sure they had help, but we shouldn't just assume that these one aren't dangerous. We have a project that says we need to immediately do it for a reason.
Didn't the Tekkets already almost get wiped out by one ship of Destroyers? Sure they had help, but we shouldn't just assume that these one aren't dangerous. We have a project that says we need to immediately do it for a reason.
Sure, but these Destroyers have been disarmed and are on derelict ships with a fleets' worth of guns pointed at them. The danger to me isn't so much them actually causing damage, it's them making a big enough nuisance of themselves that we have to blow up them and their ships.Didn't the Tekkets already almost get wiped out by one ship of Destroyers? Sure they had help, but we shouldn't just assume that these one aren't dangerous. We have a project that says we need to immediately do it for a reason.
But the prison is for CSM and chaos cultists. We are mostly building the prison so they can't summon deamons.Yeah, but it was full force with guard and admech support, not a relatively small group of PoW.
No, the prison is for CSM specifically. Cultists are part of the rehab program, from my understanding.But the prison is for CSM and chaos cultists. We are mostly building the prison so they can't summon deamons.
And I don't want to deal with an incursion if I don't have to.
But the prison is for CSM and chaos cultists. We are mostly building the prison so they can't summon deamons.
And I don't want to deal with an incursion if I don't have to.
But, like, with what will they be summoning demons? They won't have chaff to sacrifice, only... Themselves, and given how they yeeted their commanders over unwinnable battle, I don't think suicide play is likely.This
Can we not fend off hoards of demons if we can do shit to prevent them from being summoned in the first place? Because Chaos corruption can do as much damage as these guys just shooting everything to pieces.