[X] Explain that Harry has been with you all day (Charisma+Empathy can use Excellency)
[X]If they are fake(unreasonable) we can still choose violence!
[X]If they are fake(unreasonable) we can still choose violence!
this is a pretty bad idea for a lot of reasons debating video evidence is stupid on a lot of fronts.[X] Explain that Harry has been with you all day (Charisma+Empathy can use Excellency)
[X]If they are fake(unreasonable) we can still choose violence!
OOC question: FBI do not have jurisdiction over homicide on state lands. Crime has to be committed on federal land.
Most people know this
Harry certainly does.
Is this deliberate?
Because it immediately calls them out as impostors
we can easily ask the crown for irrefutable evidence we can tell the guy in front of us which will prove harrys innocence. Using one of the agents as a focus.
True True… but could we force a demon to edit this "evidence" that is obviously fake?this is a pretty bad idea for a lot of reasons debating video evidence is stupid on a lot of fronts.
the irrefutable evidence part? that seems more like a law thing than a them thing they could still insist their right even if it wouldn't hold up in court.That messes with free will, Molly is not Contessa from Worm. At most it would give you a clue as to what kind of evidence it would take you to persuade him.
Note that he did not tell you were Greene died, and you were just on the very edge of the state.
We should be able to use the scene of Harry's arrest as a focus. @DragonParadox can we use the scene itself as a focus? The crown's wording has "situation" in the list of what we can focus it on.we can easily ask the crown for irrefutable evidence we can tell the guy in front of us which will prove harrys innocence. Using one of the agents as a focus.
Can we ask for the list of physical evidence exonerating Harry under the USA law? With the arrest itself as a focus. Or would we need to be more specific, like "the list of video recordings demonstrating Harry to be in the place other than the scene of the crime / providing alibi"?That messes with free will, Molly is not Contessa from Worm. At most it would give you a clue as to what kind of evidence it would take you to persuade him.
Shouldn't matter. Murder is a federal crime in quite a limited set of circumstances, and just there being some interstate movement doesn't change that.
We should be able to use the scene of Harry's arrest as a focus. @DragonParadox can we use the scene itself as a focus? The crown's wording has "situation" in the list of what we can focus it on.
Can we ask for the list of physical evidence exonerating Harry under the USA law? With the arrest itself as a focus. Or would we need to be more specific, like "the list of video recordings demonstrating Harry to be in the place other than the scene of the crime / providing alibi"?
LIke, I am fairly sure we got caught on some traffic cameras at least. And, if the murder is recent, the videos of some store / ATM security cameras in Menominee should also have Harry in their recordings.
I mean it kind of has to exist unless someone destroyed all the traffic cam footage somehow which would definitely require some form of intellectus.If such evidence exists as a physical object you could find it that way, if it hinges on getting witnesses to testify you would hit free will.
good idea though don't buy a dashcam cause that can be tracked. also you know probably insert other people in it as well since harry alone with a teenage girl is not good for images.I wonder if we get a dashcam could a cyber demon create footage on it with a time stamp of today containing Dresden and Molly?
good idea though don't buy a dashcam cause that can be tracked. also you know probably insert other people in it as well since harry alone with a teenage girl is not good for images.
if we can make fake footage I just said to insert more people in it.Get it second hand from a dodgy shop while in disguise, I guess.
Alone with a teenage girl is better than the FBI gunning for you.
The FBI does have investigative jurisdiction over specifically homicide of state/local police officers, along with a few other things. I think they'd have to bring a state charge though?OOC question: FBI do not have jurisdiction over homicide on state lands. Crime has to be committed on federal land.
Most people know this
Harry certainly does.
Is this deliberate?
Because it immediately calls them out as impostors
They said they had video.Note that he did not tell you were Greene died, and you were just on the very edge of the state.
Either he was just a bit clear-sighted, or he was the Summer Knight until a few years ago, after faking his death some decades ago.It's a short drive to the jailhouse but along the way you still have time to ask idly. "Do you think Tolkien knew something about real magic? I've been thinking of the Ways how they are not really different roads, but one big web of interconnected realms and symbols. It sounds kind of like... 'It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.'"
"Maybe, but probably not the way you're thinking," Harry replies briefly just as pensive. "Painters, poets, artists, the good ones at least they see with a sharper eye and remember with a clearer mind, it's what draws the audience to them."