I dont really think thats accurate.I think you missed my point. I'm saying that the methods they've been using won't work if the Masquerade falls because of the much greater number of people and enemies they'd have to deal with. This has not happened yet. Going on about their track record when they haven't had to deal with a modern Masquerade absent humanity after the population boom is pointless.
And even if it was, they have had centuries to plan for the possibility.
I genuinely dont recall a vision about Nemesis' goals.What are you talking about??? The Crown showed us that bringing down the Masquerade is a goal of his. We already know that Nemesis wants that. It's not up for debate.
Its origins, yes. Its goals and methods, no.
Can I get a citation, please. If you can recall the update.
How?Point made then. They are suffering significant losses as is. It'll get worse if the Masquerade falls. Problematic for the lifeblood of an organization with many enemies waiting in the wings.
Genuine question.
Monsters are using mortal magic users they can get their hands on already.Your mentioning the increased chaos and bringing up that monsters may use the new mortal magic users as fuel. That isn't a good thing for the White Council. It makes their struggle worse.
The Masquerade falling wouldnt improve or decrease their availability to any particular faction, just increase the number of factions in play.
And the Bad Guys are just as prone to attack each other as to attack the Good Guys.
As you can see from both Cleveland and Las Vegas.
I genuinely dont see it.The Masquerade is still up. If it goes down their looses will get much worse.
They arent losing people to warlocks or Lawbreakers, they are losing people to the Vampire War. If the Masquerade broke down, that would have no impact on those losses.
The White Council isnt at risk. The lesser magical talents, potentially yes. The White Council, no.
Its very much tapering off with regards to growth rate.I'm not sure I'd call 2006 'beginning to tapper off' at least not in terms of world population. It is expected to hit 9.7 billion in 2050 up from 6.6 billion presently, that may be 'only' 50%, but it is still over three billion people more.
Like I pointed out, just over the course of the 20th century human population has gone from 2 billion in 1927 to 6 billion in 2000.
Thats 300% over 73 years.
Going from 300% in 70 years to 50% in the same period is very much tapering.
Here.Wikipedia said:
- one billion in 1804
- two billion in 1927
- three billion in 1960
- four billion in 1974
- five billion in 1987
- six billion in 1999
- seven billion in 2011
- eight billion in 2023
If you look at these official charts from the UN you'll notice that global population growth rates peaked around 1960, 1965 and have been progressively dropping since:
Given as he was 25 in 2000, Harry was born around 1975.UN Population Charts said:
Yes, the population is still growing, but its been slowing for the last half-century.
I am reasonably sure the White Council noticed and accounted for it; Butcher has been clear about how human societal uplift was a longterm project of theirs.
Which is why I wonder if Harry is simply worrying about something that the actual senior members of the Council accounted for a long time ago, but which he never bothered to ask about.
Because the tale of Harry and the White Council is a tale of miscommunication, deliberate and otherwise.