I was referring more to the fact that Sol actually spoke to Soul (heh), and explicitly said that he was turning his face back to Creation.
Yes, I know 3e has him turning his face back to Creation. That's why I said;
I prefer to lean into it and say Sol doesn't choose 'his' Exalted anymore. It fits the feel better.
3e is swinging the other way, and I was saying I feel that it is wrong in doing so.

EDIT: This is perfectly unsurprising, by the way. Hatewheel was well known to be in love with the idea of Sol as a perfect messiah figure (have you heard the good word of That Time Sol Offered Himself To The Primordials To Save A Single Human?), and for that reason I look forward to finding out whether this interpretation persists into Minton and Vance's reign.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I know 3e has him turning his face back to Creation. That's why I said;
3e is swinging the other way, and I was saying I feel that it is wrong in doing so.
Ah, I see. My mistake.

Honestly, I'm torn. On one hand, the Sol-as-example stuff you pointed out is very compelling. On the other, so is the idea of Sol turning his face back to Creation and finding it in the state it's in, but being so reduced that all he can do is retrieve his Exaltations and release them into the world once more (which might have been a mighty accomplishment in the first place).
 
I think the mythic and weird fantasy themes can perfectly work together, it's just a question of writing them properly. I have come to lean more 3e as time went on, but I'm gonna be real; I have some pretty persistent issues with how 3e handles things, just as I have them with 2e and 1e, and I think Exalted could really benefit from, as I've talked a little bit with @Rook (and she has talked far more about herself) about before:
  • A style guide.
  • A consistent art style befitting the style guide.
  • Some core axioms and an identity for what it actually wants to be about.
  • Immense amount of research into culture and myth, because God, does it need it.
Yes, I know 3e has him turning his face back to Creation. That's why I said;
3e is swinging the other way, and I was saying I feel that it is wrong in doing so.
Yeah, I'm the one who's entirely fine with the Sun having been spending the years away at the Games of Divinity until some spark of excellence catches his eye and he Chooses a new Lawgiver. Because I feel it's perfectly appropriate for the sun to be a victorious war-god and sky-father, resting on his laurels after victory and playing away at games, while forsaking his duties as the Most High and King of Heaven. But I have, and likely will again, in the future argued for autonomous Exaltation process before, because as you say, it can support some pretty rad themes.
 
This makes perfect sense, though? Creation is not his anymore, he fought a war against the Creators of Reality and defended the bordermarches of Creation against innumerable onslaughts from immaterial proto-reality, obeying the same accursed masters for uncounted aeons.
Um where is it said that Creation isn't his?
He's still the King of Heaven; the Heavenly Bureaucracy still run most of Creation's underlying reality engine. They are still the ones worshipped.
Solars are in the position of being given the keys to their dad's car, but his name is still on the title.

We're not even at the point where he's being asked to personally take the field.
Just demand the bureaucracy he's in charge of do their job.
Stuff like the Aerial Legions fall under his remit. Assuming they exist in 3E.

What does he owe Creation? What does he owe humanity? Why would he be ordering the Celestial Bureaucracy around, when he could be contently chilling with the Maidens and Luna with the Games of Divinity? You know, the Games? The one that he and his fellows fought a war imperiling most of Creation to get? Those Games?
Yeah, nah, I think he's pretty comfortable where he is mate.
It has been said that 3E canon states that Sol is picking the new Solars.
He is watching Creation enough to be aware and to make picks.
That rather contradicts the whole Games of Divinity explanation that was largely used for 2E's explanation for Sol's inactivity.

Why should he be ordering the Bureaucracy around? If not principle, self-interest.
You intervene for the same reason that you get antsy when your kid chooses to brew nitroglycerine or sarin in your basement.
When godkilling superweapons are in circulation that murdered the Titans, well....

My point is that you can't have it both ways.If you want to play the indolent non-interventionist Sol of 2E? I came in with 2E, I have no problem with it.

If on the other hand, you are positing a cosmology where the King of Heaven is personally involved in determining the disposition of Solar Exaltations each time a Solar dies? Then it demands a minimal amount of activity from him/them, whether out of pure self-interest or principle.
The Balorean Crusade went by without a whimper as Creation literally dissolved.

The initial Great Curse should have drawn a response.
The corruption of almost half the Solar Exaltations into Abyssal and Infernal versions should have drawn a response.
===========================================================================================================================
You make it sound like 150 Solar exaltations and an uncertain number of Exigents are, you know, no big deal. So yes, all he did was let loose hundreds of divinely empowered champions with the power to reshape society, kill nearly everything and do pretty much everything else that isn't literally impossible in the setting. How dare he do so little.
He didn't make the Solar Exaltations anew.
And frankly, if he has the time and effort to create entirely new Exigents and hand them out to lesser gods, he would have the time and effort to have the existing Celestial Bureaucracy be more active and more effective. It is a vastly higher-yield activity than handing out the ability for Exigents.

Basically, entirely too much of 3E cosmology as described requires a much more activist Incarna than we actually see.
They would have been better off with explanations that didn't require Sol's active intervention.
My opinion, of course.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I'm the one who's entirely fine with the Sun having been spending the years away at the Games of Divinity until some spark of excellence catches his eye and he Chooses a new Lawgiver. Because I feel it's perfectly appropriate for the sun to be a victorious war-god and sky-father, resting on his laurels after victory and playing away at games, while forsaking his duties as the Most High and King of Heaven. But I have, and likely will again, in the future argued for autonomous Exaltation process before, because as you say, it can support some pretty rad themes.
Ultimately, the clincher for me is that for most practical intents and purposes, Sol doesn't matter. The dude is sequestered off in, not even in an isolated sub-setting, but an isolated cranny of an isolated sub-setting. He is twice-removed from 90% of actual play, and has never had meaningful hints of wanting to change that. Realistically speaking, unless you make 'meet Sol' a dedicated goal of a long-running campaign, he's probably never going to get screentime at the table.

Which means that, from a design perspective, giving Sol things like character arcs about turning back to Creation and struggling to help a broken world, or moral positions on this or that issue for characters to reflect upon? It's wasted effort. Wordcount that could be better spent on something else. If you want to tell those stories, cool, go nuts, but you'll have an easier time hanging them on somebody who's actually in Creation. The Golden Lord would probably work well - as far as I can tell he basically exists to be a mini-Sol for exactly that purpose. Sol himself works best as a vague presence in the background, something to make a statement about the game as a whole. This is why I prefer the Sun to be an immoral figure as an example of the setting's lack of moral paragons; it is both a point that Exalted wants to make, and a narratively efficient place to make that point.
 
Last edited:
Um where is it said that Creation isn't his?
He's still the King of Heaven; the Heavenly Bureaucracy still run most of Creation's underlying reality engine. They are still the ones worshipped.
Solars are in the position of being given the keys to their dad's car, but his name is still on the title.

We're not even at the point where he's being asked to personally take the field.
Just demand the bureaucracy he's in charge of do their job.
Stuff like the Aerial Legions fall under his remit. Assuming they exist in 3E.


It has been said that 3E canon states that Sol is picking the new Solars.
He is watching Creation enough to be aware and to make picks.
That rather contradicts the whole Games of Divinity explanation that was largely used for 2E's explanation for Sol's inactivity.

Why should he be ordering the Bureaucracy around? If not principle, self-interest.
You intervene for the same reason that you get antsy when your kid chooses to brew nitroglycerine or sarin in your basement.
When godkilling superweapons are in circulation that murdered the Titans, well....

My point is that you can't have it both ways.If you want to play the indolent non-interventionist Sol of 2E? I came in with 2E, I have no problem with it.

If on the other hand, you are positing a cosmology where the King of Heaven is personally involved in determining the disposition of Solar Exaltations each time a Solar dies? Then it demands a minimal amount of activity from him/them, whether out of pure self-interest or principle.
The Balorean Crusade went by without a whimper as Creation literally dissolved.

The initial Great Curse should have drawn a response.
The corruption of almost half the Solar Exaltations into Abyssal and Infernal versions should have drawn a response.

Frankly, your post comes off as kinda incoherent to me, and I'm not entirely sure of the point you're trying to make, maybe because you made like, five at the same time? Could you try and clarify your point so it can be said in a few sentences, without splitting up my post into two sections and making a billion points at once, yeah?

I'm going to state my essential view here:

The Sun is ruler of Heaven, but the Exalted Host are rulers of Creation, the Sun does not have to defend or even bother one whit about the state of Creation right now. He gave it to his Chosen, and is fine and dandy spending his time whiling away at the Games of Divinity, until some spark of Excellence catches his eye and you get a new Chosen. Order the Bureaucracy? Surely there are bureau heads for that? Creation isn't his responsibility, and if his Chosen aren't up to that task...

Well, then the Games are right here, aren't they?

Ultimately, the clincher for me is that for most practical intents and purposes, Sol doesn't matter. The dude is sequestered off in, not even in an isolated sub-setting, but an isolated cranny of an isolated sub-setting. He is twice-removed from 90% of actual play, and has never had meaningful hints of wanting to change that. Realistically speaking, unless you make 'meet Sol' a dedicated goal of a long-running campaign, he's probably never going to get screentime at the table.

Which means that, from a design perspective, giving Sol things like character arcs about turning back to Creation and struggling to help a broken world, or moral positions on this or that issue for characters to reflect upon? It's wasted effort. Wordcount that could be better spent on something else. Sol works best as a vague presence in the background, something to make a statement about the game as a whole. This is why I prefer the Sun to be an immoral figure as an example of the setting's lack of moral paragons; it is both a point that Exalted wants to make, and a narratively efficient place to make that point.
Yeah, that's fair. It's my intention with an active chooser to make a moral statement of the Sun not caring about Creation except for whatever catches his eye at the moment, but if I had to make a decision based on my wordcount, I'd just not detail the Exaltation process beyond the absolutely most basic and use the wordcount on more culture instead. I think, in effect, our visions probably reach just about the same conclusions in practice, honestly?

Imrix: The Exaltations are entirely autonomous, choosing whatever people need them in their time of need, while some people don't get them instead. This leads to some people being endowed with completely unacceptable amounts of power in an utterly unfair manner. The Sun has no moral authority at all, and doesn't matter to your story.
ManusDomine: The Exaltations are a direct blessing of the Sun, who chooses whatever people need them in their time of need when he gazes away from the Games of Divinity, which means some people don't get them instead. This leads to some people being endowed with completely unacceptable amounts of power in an utterly unfair manner. The Sun has no moral authority at all, and doesn't matter to your story.

Hey look, your view is more wordcount-effective!
 
On the other hand, say, as part of my Kimbery oath stuff, I've got an option that lets you grant some (minor) powers to people who've already willingly sworn obedience to you, at the small small cost of their near eternal damnation. That's because this is invoking Yakuza oaths and the Esoteric Order of Dagon, where you have to give yourself fully to an organisation and in return you get something from them. Notably, how it works is that they can learn the spirit charms of 1CDs who descend from you from tutors - it's not a fast way of granting power.

sometimes you just gotta sleep with the fishes m80

Which is a good thing, to me. Whether it be out of exhaustion or willful ignorance or even outright malice, Sol should be an immoral figure. That's what he's for, to me. He exists as a blunt reminder that as a setting, Exalted has no use for moral paragons. As far as I'm concerned, the narrative purpose of Sol Invictus is to be a putz. He's there to make a simple statement; "Behold the god of excellence and righteous action! See him broken on the altar of his own vice and exhaustion! Go forth, Chosen, and be your own light in the darkness."

Man I'm like a page and a half too late to a super interesting conversation and all the good points have been taken, motherfucker.

I think...honestly in my capacity as Some Rando Who Enjoys The Weird Hybrid Setting In His Head (like pretty much all of you, let's be honest, everyone's personal Creation varies like hell for something that it seems like people never play games in :V) I significantly prefer @Imrix's interpretation. It speaks way more to the...dunno, to the used aspect of the setting that I like. The ruins of Shogunate Las Vegas built around the core of a small, Solar-era luxury manse, now inhabited by a tribal confederation of tropical bird beastmen and monsters and science experiments who were imported as servants and slaves and gladiators. The weight of history and the way past decisions resonate forward I guess?

The Sun turned his face from Creation. He washed his hands of it all and gave up his right to rule it (in fact if not necessarily law) so that he could just enjoy his well-earned rest. It feels thematically dissonant to have him as some big glowy good guy in the sky, intervening just enough to kick off Solar plots but not, like, more than that to fix things. And still claim that he is a moral figure y'know? And just as a side note 'cause this is as good a place for the thought as any, like, it was brought up elsewhere but nobody really seems to mind the idea that Luna or the Maidens are kinda immoral in how they choose/guide their champions. Luna is weird and mercurial and their shards reward weird and mercurial things and while they often take an active interest nobody expects it to necessarily be benign or benevolent. Similarly the Maidens are heading up the Heavenly FBI and are a mix of bureaucratic planning and grand manipulation.

But yeah it's somewhat jarring if all he's doing is basically turning away from the television to waggle his fingers a bit and magic up some more supersoldiers during the commercial break. It feels richer and somewhat more satisfying I guess if you can reasonably suspect or outright know in setting that there is no golden safety net so to speak. The closest thing the world has to a high god doesn't really care anymore. He only vaguely knows you exist and probably won't even realize it if you die. Sol Invictus is broken down and burned out and might honestly resent you for saying that he owes you anything. He might not even be completely wrong to.

It's a strong, evocative, and personally appealing statement that dovetails in more with a lot of what I like about the setting in all its sloppy glory.

And tying this into the broader argument (for clarity's sake: I enjoy the more sci-fi mythic elements of Exalted which I know is a bit controversial) I like what the Exaltations as a functionally autonomous drone-thing says and does I think. An important, or well one of the important, thematic points in the RPG is that you should be...deeply suspicious I think? Given the Dragonborn and their position as antagonists to many other Exalted and their own internal dogfuckery. Of divine right and other claims to supernal power as being inherently deserved. And it's a closed system running that nobody can really stop or turn off, just guide or work to shape if they pay attention or put in the legwork, like Luna and the Maidens do.

So it's- it works I think if you can say in setting and not be a liar that nobody deserves the supreme, supernal power they have. That there were dozens if not hundreds of others who could have gotten the same shard you did. That every Abyssal or Infernal you meet could have been you and you could have been them. That the supposed, like, massive barriers separating the glorious golden chosen from the nameless failures or the mutant hell-monsters or the deathknights are really wire thin and down to more luck than most people are comfortable admitting.
 
Last edited:

90% of writing is just stealing stuff you liked manus
90% of arguing is just stealing someone else's better points that they made on a discord and didn't get around to posting yet so now you look like the smart one

it's not my fault you hate writing manus

edit: no wait i'm the dumbass you literally said just that right before me fuck
 
Last edited:
Frankly, your post comes off as kinda incoherent to me, and I'm not entirely sure of the point you're trying to make, maybe because you made like, five at the same time? Could you try and clarify your point so it can be said in a few sentences, without splitting up my post into two sections and making a billion points at once, yeah?

I'm going to state my essential view here:

The Sun is ruler of Heaven, but the Exalted Host are rulers of Creation, the Sun does not have to defend or even bother one whit about the state of Creation right now. He gave it to his Chosen, and is fine and dandy spending his time whiling away at the Games of Divinity, until some spark of Excellence catches his eye and you get a new Chosen. Order the Bureaucracy? Surely there are bureau heads for that? Creation isn't his responsibility, and if his Chosen aren't up to that task...

Well, then the Games are right here, aren't they?
Let me try again:
The Sun is ruler of Heaven and Creation. He is worshipped as such, even the Dragonbloods who kicked over the Solars are wary of disrespect.
He handed over stewardship of Creation to the Solars, but they rule in his name, not by their own right.
They have the Creation-Ruling Mandate; it's a mandate, not a birthright.

If Sol is aware enough to be actively involved in picking new Solars and forging Exigent Exaltations for other gods to empower, he is activist enough that the Celestial Bureaucracy he putatively oversees, and the Creation it is responsible for, should be a lot more effective than it currently is.


Furthermore, given that not all the Solar Exaltations were imprisoned?
He would have had to be aware of the Usurpation, of the Wyld Hunts running down survivors, of the Balorean Crusade and the Great Contagion.
Since he is personally involved in each Exaltation, he should even be aware of the Great Curse.

And not only did he do nothing personally, he didn't command his underlings to do anything.

This is the 3E writeup for the Incarnae, that I can find:
The Greatest of the Gods
The greatest gods of Heaven and Earth are the Incarnae,
the patrons of the Celestial Exalted. These seven gods were
the first to empower mortal champions to throw down the
creators of the world. Now in Heaven they rest or wait,
seldom emerging from the Jade Pleasure Dome or sharing
counsel with their lessers. Some say they are still weary
from the effort of creating their Chosen; some say they hide
themselves from worldly affairs because they fear the power
the Exalted wield. They deign not to address such gossip.


The Unconquered Sun
Highest of the gods, the Unconquered Sun once walked
the borders of Creation, guarding it against threats from
beyond. He was unbending and invincible, but could not
raise a hand against his creators, who
indulged themselves in every manner
of amusement with the world they'd
set him to protect. It was he who de-
clared the gods would give men favor
and make them champions against
his enemies, and it was he who chose
the greatest mortals as champions of
his own.

It is known in Heaven that some great
blasphemy by the Exalted of the First
Age made him wroth, and so he
turned his face from the world. Now
he turns it back.


Luna
Luna tempers the Unconquered Sun's
light and gives the world succor from
his unbending righteousness.
She is
a huntress, seductress, liar, monster,
saint and devil—all these things
inside one skin or a thousand skins.
Luna is the most active Incarna—she
still attends the Exaltation of each of
her Chosen, and far-flung tribes
recount tales of her hunts and dalli-
ances among the mortal world. But
her greatest love was and remains
Gaia—it was Luna who gave succor to
the Emerald Mother and turned her
to the side of the gods when Gaia grew
tired of her siblings' misconduct.

The Five Maidens
Mercury, the Maiden of Journeys;
Venus, the Maiden of Serenity; Mars,
the Maiden of Battles, Jupiter, the Maiden of Secrets; and
Saturn, the Maiden of Endings: These are the Five Maidens,
the Ladies of Fate, most inscrutable of the Incarnae. They
say little and speak in enigmas; what they love most is in-
evitability. Mercury loves the explorer venturing into the
unknown; she loves the refugee fleeing atrocity. Mars loves
the loyal soldier and the rebel; she loves the warrior glori-
ously triumphant and the warrior cut down.

They seem to walk a lonely road, the Maidens, keeping
the world ever balanced on the path of what must be. Even
their Chosen regard them with unease—whether Side-
real ventures fail or succeed, always the Maidens say it
was fated to be so. Though they head the Bureau of Destiny
in Heaven, they delegate many of their duties to subordi-
nates and the Sidereal Exalted, and appear only when
needed. When one of the Five
Maidens is absent from the Jade Plea-
sure Dome, Heaven holds its breath.
Do you grok my concern?

Much of Sol's (sparse) characterization in 3E seems centered around his morality and righteousness, which is undercut by his awareness of....I hesitate to call it atrocity, but that's what it was. 2E sidestepped that by sequestering him in the Dome.
3E seems to want him more involved, which has unfortunate implications for the rest of his characterization.

Hope that was clearer.
 
Let me try again:
The Sun is ruler of Heaven and Creation. He is worshipped as such, even the Dragonbloods who kicked over the Solars are wary of disrespect.
He handed over stewardship of Creation to the Solars, but they rule in his name, not by their own right.
They have the Creation-Ruling Mandate; it's a mandate, not a birthright.

If Sol is aware enough to be actively involved in picking new Solars and forging Exigent Exaltations for other gods to empower, he is activist enough that the Celestial Bureaucracy he putatively oversees, and the Creation it is responsible for, should be a lot more effective than it currently is.


Furthermore, given that not all the Solar Exaltations were imprisoned?
He would have had to be aware of the Usurpation, of the Wyld Hunts running down survivors, of the Balorean Crusade and the Great Contagion.
Since he is personally involved in each Exaltation, he should even be aware of the Great Curse.

And not only did he do nothing personally, he didn't command his underlings to do anything.

This is the 3E writeup for the Incarnae, that I can find:

Do you grok my concern?

Much of Sol's (sparse) characterization in 3E seems centered around his morality and righteousness, which is undercut by his awareness of....I hesitate to call it atrocity, but that's what it was. 2E sidestepped that by sequestering him in the Dome.
3E seems to want him more involved, which has unfortunate implications for the rest of his characterization.

Hope that was clearer.
Ah yeah, thanks for that. I think the problem is that my view is well, not that of 3e. I don't think the Sun has any moral authority at all, in fact I am specifically making it so he is an active chooser because that means he sat by apathetically through the darkest years of Creation, doing nothing while the Dragon-Blooded, Lunars and mortal men and women fought, died and bled for Creation. To put it in Roman terms:

"While Rome debates, Saguntum is in danger."

I want it to be pretty explicit that the Sun, as an active chooser has basically forsaken all responsibility and is resting on his laurels doing nothing of what he should be doing. I don't really agree with a view that tries to give him moral authority while also making him an active chooser, because well.

I think that's dumb. :V
 
Let me try again:
The Sun is ruler of Heaven and Creation. He is worshipped as such, even the Dragonbloods who kicked over the Solars are wary of disrespect.
He handed over stewardship of Creation to the Solars, but they rule in his name, not by their own right.
They have the Creation-Ruling Mandate; it's a mandate, not a birthright.

Just to be clear as far as I can tell there is no mandate of Heaven in third edtion.

After the creators of the world were felled the incarna, who were essentially slaves, retired to the jade pleasure dome. The first age was forged through a great Interregnum per WFHW. As far as the solars being on top that was a result of their actions during this period, not because sol told everybody to listen to his shiny golden mascots.
 
If I was writing, I'd play up the idea that Exaltations are part of the Sun. The Sun is not a human being and does not need to fit human notions of individual personhood; if Malfeas can be both Brass Dancer and Demon City, why can't Sol be both King of Heaven and your Exaltation?

My immediate answer is 'it looks like summoning a bunch of marrottes to do the job, and a lot of yelling at them to make them do it without recreating the architecture of Malfeas.'

He's looking to write a new spell, not looking for ways to use existing spells.
 
"celestial exaltations are autonomous hunter seeker drones that the incarna have no control over" is a 2eism that came about when someone expanded "the gods are geased to do not raise a hand against the primordials" into "the gods are geased into obeying the primordials because of innate mind control" and then someone asked why the yozi didn't just order the incarnae to order their chosen to stand down and the devs had to ass pull a reason.

2e was FULL of writers over explaining things and not thinking the repercussions through and then watching the fandom extrapolate minor details into theories that go against the spirit of the setting but perfectly fit into the mechanics of the game.
 
Stuff like the Aerial Legions fall under his remit. Assuming they exist in 3E.
They damn well better exist. They were awesome, and Nazri was a huge favorite of mine.

As for the Exaltation thing, I can present the view my group uses?

The Exaltations choose their hosts. Not Sol or any god, and while there is a list of general qualifications for each type, the Exaltation chooses. Specific Exaltation have their own preferences for hosts, in that between two equally qualified individuals it will choose the one that more matches it's desired traits, which can be anything from temperament to gender to attribute prioritization to past circumstances. They also tend to be...fiddly? And not entirely predicable or controllable in other ways. They are not obligated to immediately choose a new host on the passing of their last, and indeed several have "hung" for centuries at a time. Sidereal Exaltations in particular like to do this, waiting for someone they know will exist in the future and will be an ideal host. They do not necessarily even return to Lytek, though most do, and the amount he can actually trim each one varies. A LOT. One Lunar exaltation for example has never been trimmed at all, ever, and Lytek is kind of scared of it because it has had two hosts prior to the current time, both of which did not like him, and were very, very powerful.

The Exaltation are not necessarily sentient, but are definitely not as simple as canon makes them out to be. Auto sort of knows about this, but it was mostly beneath his notice. Lytek hides the degree of seeming intelligence in the Exaltations, out of fear of what might happen if people realized the superweapons give 0 fucks about anyone's opinion but their own. The Incarnae can nudge one of their own in a direction, but it's by no means control, and they have been ignored before. Luna loves it, the Maidens are quietly disturbed, Sol is mostly just confused when he pays attention to it.
 
"celestial exaltations are autonomous hunter seeker drones that the incarna have no control over" is a 2eism that came about when someone expanded "the gods are geased to do not raise a hand against the primordials" into "the gods are geased into obeying the primordials because of innate mind control" and then someone asked why the yozi didn't just order the incarnae to order their chosen to stand down and the devs had to ass pull a reason.

2e was FULL of writers over explaining things and not thinking the repercussions through and then watching the fandom extrapolate minor details into theories that go against the spirit of the setting but perfectly fit into the mechanics of the game.
Not all 2eisms are automatically bad.
 
Not all 2eisms are automatically bad.
Yeah but i think this one is. When people jump on "yeah you're only a hero because of LUCK" I think it dismisses the actions they performed to earn their exaltation, in the same style as the old "DBs aren't REAL exalted because it's inherited" arguments did.
So.... on the city repairing spell???
You want Incantation of Effective Restoration but for a city? Solar tier, it's gonna take a week to cast and require the sorcerer to mark the city throughout in some expensive manner to take effect. It's not a "snap your fingers and POOF, a city" thing.
 
Yeah but i think this one is. When people jump on "yeah you're only a hero because of LUCK" I think it dismisses the actions they performed to earn their exaltation, in the same style as the old "DBs aren't REAL exalted because it's inherited" arguments did.
You're not 'a hero' because of luck. You're an Exalt because of luck. You performed at least one act that could be considered 'heroic' (note, its entirely possible this is the only thing you've done that's at all exceptional, whereas someone more consistently heroic can be passed over by an Exaltation) and an available Exaltation came and empowered you, generally resulting in you going on to do more 'heroic', or at least 'great', deeds.

Exalts can be straight up villains, even if they glow gold instead of black or green.
 
You're not 'a hero' because of luck. You're an Exalt because of luck. You performed at least one act that could be considered 'heroic' (note, its entirely possible this is the only thing you've done that's at all exceptional, whereas someone more consistently heroic can be passed over by an Exaltation) and an available Exaltation came and empowered you, generally resulting in you going on to do more 'heroic', or at least 'great', deeds.

Exalts can be straight up villains, even if they glow gold instead of black or green.
Could it be pointed out that you can 'earn' your exaltation after you've become an exalt? Yes, you didn't necessarily deserve it beforehand, for whatever value 'deserving' holds, but you can certainly at least try to live up to the privilege you've been given.
 
Could it be pointed out that you can 'earn' your exaltation after you've become an exalt? Yes, you didn't necessarily deserve it beforehand, for whatever value 'deserving' holds, but you can certainly at least try to live up to the privilege you've been given.
I mean, yes you can. You can try to live up to the power you've been given. That doesn't mean you deserved it when you got it any more than anyone else who could have gotten it. Hell, the other guy might have done more good with it than you!

That's not even touching the argument some people have, where it is literally impossible to actually live up to the Exaltation.
 
Last edited:
The first age was forged through a great Interregnum per WFHW. As far as the solars being on top that was a result of their actions during this period, not because sol told everybody to listen to his shiny golden mascots.
Which is a 120% more compelling and interesting than what we got in 2e, imo. Probably the thing I hated the most about 2e was the sense of, of entitlement that pervaded it. Even if when I'm in the mood for a bit of power fantasy, I want a fantasy in which I am powerful, not a fantasy in which I get my dick sucked for existing.
 
I mean, yes you can. You can try to live up to the power you've been given. That doesn't mean you deserved it when you got it any more than anyone else who could have gotten it. Hell, the other guy might have done more good with it than you!

That's not even touching the argument some people have, where it is literally impossible to actually live up to the Exaltation.
In reply to the latter point, I'd say that by using the impossible power of the Exaltation as well as you can you are living up to it - that whole 'you can't reasonably be expected to do better than your best' thing - but I suspect that's an unsatisfying answer for many.
 
Last edited:
Yeah but i think this one is. When people jump on "yeah you're only a hero because of LUCK" I think it dismisses the actions they performed to earn their exaltation, in the same style as the old "DBs aren't REAL exalted because it's inherited" arguments did.
Okay. I think that's an unfair characterisation of the argument; people haven't been saying luck is the only factor in determining who exalts, only that the process is somewhat arbitrary. This is especially so because in many cases a person 'earns' Exaltation not for achieving some great act, but attempting it, and taking the Second Breath is what allows them to succeed.

But your opinion is, naturally, yours. For my part, I take the view that treating ultimate cosmic power as something which can be 'earned' by a few impressive acts is what cheapens and dismisses the power and wonder of Exaltation, and that it is to the game's benefit to question what makes a hero, and whether a divine choice is truly a good recommendation for making someone a champion of today.
 
Back
Top