Graypairofsocks
What is Grammar?
- Location
- earth
I was relistening to some songs and this one's themes kind of reminded me of Exalted:
I was relistening to some songs and this one's themes kind of reminded me of Exalted:
You ask what it needs to save Creation? You propose schemes, solutions, stratagems to put it beyond risk or threat of destruction, to safeguard it from harm and deliver it into eternal and harmonious accord?
Then I say this to you, you labour in futility. What you seek to do is, in its entirety, impossible. You cannot create a permanent peace, set Creation beyond the spectre of war and conflict forever. For nothing lasts forever, save for the Exaltations, and perhaps not even those. Who can say what will come ere the dawn of the new Age, or the next? No, however high and strong you build your tower, in time its foundations will wear away to nothing, and it will fall.
But. But.
An eternal peace cannot be reached, not by man or god or even, I think, by Exalted Host. Too many forces stand opposed to such, not the least of which are time and humanity itself. But a lasting peace, now - one that will carry the years well, and remain after you have gone, long enough for another to, perhaps, take up its reins... that, now, that can be done. It will not guarantee an eternity for Creation, for your legacy will still crumble in time. But you will be dust by then, and must trust those who come after you. Eventually, all must step back and allow their children to carry their torch, and to think you can arrange matters such that they never need to is arrogance - do you truly think that none but you can defend Creation, even past your death?
So. A lasting peace. One that will not remain forever, but which will safeguard Creation for a time, before it fades away for others to take up its mantle and build kingdoms of their own. They may do so. They may not. For us ancestors, we can do naught but trust in their judgement, and build what we can now. But even a lasting peace is not an easy, or simple affair. Not in all the history of Creation has such a thing been done, for scuffles marked the First Age to the point of breaking time itself, and the warring of the Shogunate against itself is legendary. There is no simple path to peace, no stratagem that can be encapsulated in a single line, or even a single tome. It is perhaps the most complex undertaking imaginable, dependent on all who aid and oppose it. To think that such a goal could be sought and summarised in a single course of action - however lofty a goal it might be, even to the level of destroying the Exaltations or curing the Great Curse - is madness. These things will not bring peace in and of themselves.
No. I shall tell you the cost of a lasting peace. It costs work. Every day. Every week. Every year, it costs work. It costs battles and betrayals. Choices and challenges. Dilemmas and dichotomies. You must make decisions that seem unsolvable, while never losing sight of your path. You must face down enemies and allies both, while still being admitting to your errors. You must listen to those you govern, without letting them set the course to anarchy. You must take every individual obstacle and find the right path through it, even when the path is murky and what is right is unclear.
The Exalted can rule effectively. The Exalted can rule efficiently. But no Charm, no magic, nothing in all existence can tell one how to rule wisely. There is no ability, magic or mundane, that will reveal to you the wisest course of action - only the most effective. One is not the other, and it is important to remember this. For what you need to create a lasting peace is the wisdom to rule well, and that cannot be taught or bought or caught by any means, even experience. It is a challenge to one's own soul, and one in which the Exalted are no better equipped than any mortal, for wisdom guides one in what they use their power for, rather than merely in using it.
You speak of "saving Creation" as if it is something you plan out in a day, or a week, or a year. As if one can simply find the right thing to do, the right button to press, and all will be well. But there is no such thing, and if you think otherwise, you fail to appreciate the magnitude of the task you set yourself. It is not something you can plan out in advance, for so very much of it must be done in reaction to what you find as you do it. It is not something that will hinge on a single quest or set-up, for it must change in reaction to every force that seeks to destabilise it. The way to save Creation is not some great undertaking or strategy or plan to accomplish. It is simply to rule wisely and well, and never falter in either.
And that cannot be done in anything less - or for anything more - than a lifetime.
But now you'll be even slower in updating your quests... I need a dislike button.
I mean, so did I; I think I played a Twilight doctor out of the 1e core back in... '04? It was a running joke for my group at the time that the game was impossible to fit together - that you could never find anything, that books blatantly contradicted each other as to how the setting (and the different Exalted types) worked, that the terminology seemed designed deliberately to confuse, etc.I disagree completely.
The 1e chapter fictions were masterful, and especially the introductory story of Aesha in Chiaroscuro captures the setting perfectly. The setting chapter is wonderful and explains what you can use different organizations and characters for, as well as have excellent introductions to the various fiefdoms and empires throughout Creation, such as the Realm or the Scavenger Lands.
But then, I had my introduction to Exalted in First Edition, so it may look different to me.
Well, for one thing we're talking about THEION, who became Malfeas when the Exalted decided to brutally murder his non-murdery fetich. There's a rather significant difference.
Well, yes there was, it was just simpler than YHWH's itemized list. Theion went for something more like "And ye shall obey me and honor me in all things, and in exchange ye shall be permitted to dwell upon my Creation."
There were, actually - we just don't know much about them, because the Exalted Host butchered them all for daring to side with their own creators over a passel of disgruntled managerial robots and their pet aphids.
Um, Omicron, Theion isn't literally YHWH. White Wolf is not, in fact, claiming that they built a time machine, went back to the founding of Judaism, and brought back photo evidence that Theion masterminded it all. Yes, these two insanely specific examples are not, in fact, things Theion did, but they're also not exactly defining elements of the dogma. You might as well be arguing that the lack of Theion-crumping iron chariots proves you right.there is no guidance to freedom out of the desert (on a journey made arbitrarily longer as a punishment for apostasy), there are no prophets send to save their people from extermination (by exterminating the other guy instead),
Again, I guess you're right? Still not sure how that matters. Also, as somebody pointed out, Cecelyne does things like that and was also very close to Theion before the Exalted Host decided to work out their repressed torture porn fetishes on him.there are no tablets of law (which combine crucial foundations of society and self-serving worship).
See, the thing here is that you can have as much or as little ambiguity/complexity as you're willing to credit the Primordials with, because the only sources of information on what really happened are highly opinionated and distorted by time/madness.
Again, Malfeas =/= Theion, any more than Adorjan = Adrian.This is fine if you want Malfeas to just be, well, Malfeas. Malfeas doesn't have these nuanced sides. He was a ruthless, cruel, uncaring tyrant. But if you want Malfeas as a commentary on the Biblical God then you're just constructing the kind of cheap strawman I'd expect out of a Philip Pullman story. It would be a more nuanced story if Malfeas actually had the complexity of a relationship with mankind where humanity eventually decides that this isn't worth it and it wants freedom, and rises up to fight God; but then the game would be a lot more risky, and a lot more in-your-face about its politics, than it wants to be. And that's saying something.
As has been mentioned by several other posters, discussions of how to commit digital piracy are not permitted here.
No, what you're describing is how Malfean and Cecelynian UMI work. The infernal excellency makes you better by tapping into the well of Yozi Essence inside you, much like the solar excellency makes you better by tapping into the well of Solar Essence inside you.So when a Solar uses an excellency, she is being supernaturally skilled at the task. Her speeches put FDR's to shame, her skill allows her to react to her enemies moves before they even start etc.
When an Infernal uses one their channeling the essence of the Yozis, right? So they aren't necessarily getting more skilled are they? If an Infernal channels Malfeas to convince someone She simply orders it and they recognize they obey as She is the rightful ruler. Cecelyne tells you to do something and you do so because you believe it to be a de facto or de jure law of society etc.
Is this the correct way of looking at it?
Sorta? Infernal Excellencies are basically drawing upon their Yozi's skill at a thing because they're a certain way. Your not incredibly intimidating because Malfeas is the Tyrant. Malfeas is very skilled at intimidation because he needs to be to be a proper Tyrant, and you're drawing on that skill of being intimidating. Similarly, Cecelyne isn't good at law and such because she's the Lawgiver of the Yozi. She needs to be good at making laws because that's her job and you draw upon that when using her excellency.So when a Solar uses an excellency, she is being supernaturally skilled at the task. Her speeches put FDR's to shame, her skill allows her to react to her enemies moves before they even start etc.
When an Infernal uses one their channeling the essence of the Yozis, right? So they aren't necessarily getting more skilled are they? If an Infernal channels Malfeas to convince someone She simply orders it and they recognize they obey as She is the rightful ruler. Cecelyne tells you to do something and you do so because you believe it to be a de facto or de jure law of society etc.
Is this the correct way of looking at it?
Yes, exactly.
First Edition had a coherent design vision and an idea of what it actually wanted to do, while Second Edition was mostly mindless repetition and pointless, trite detail.
Large parts of the Sufficient Velocity Exalted community don't like Third (me included), though some think it's great (most notably @Omicron, who has done all the awesome 3e homebrew and who can tell you all sorts of things).
(most notably @Omicron, who has done all the awesome 3e homebrew and who can tell you all sorts of things).
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE
My problem with Malfeas-as-YHVH is that this reading tends to stop at "pillars of salt" and "Sodom and Gomhora" and discards all the nuance of the character. It's not really a critical look at an Old Testament God figure, it's just a take-down. There is no Covenant, there is no chosen people, there is no guidance to freedom out of the desert (on a journey made arbitrarily longer as a punishment for apostasy), there are no prophets send to save their people from extermination (by exterminating the other guy instead), there are no tablets of law (which combine crucial foundations of society and self-serving worship). There's no complexity.
Ha!
(To be honest, I interact with Omicron more than you, so I kinda forgot. You do some nice homebrew too.)
To be honest, @Omicron basically won me over with The Mourning Queen's Regalia, which I maintain as one of the best pieces of homebrew (hell, one of the best pieces of Exalted writing) I have seen.
No this is the first time i saw this policy in this thread since i only been here once before.[warning=Piracy is a crime]As has been mentioned by several other posters, discussions of how to commit digital piracy are not permitted here.
[/warning]
(Also, I'm Staff now. This warning may have been an excuse to play around with all these fancy new buttons I have on my screen.)
No this is the first time i saw this policy in this thread since i only been here once before.
And the only one i know that is a policy is this thing call celestial bliss trick that get thread-ban
(admittedly, i don't think they moderate in threads they post in due to that being bad policy and carrying a greater risk of bias)
No this is the first time i saw this policy in this thread since i only been here once before.
And the only one i know that is a policy is this thing call celestial bliss trick that get thread-ban
- Illegal Material is Prohibited.
You can't post anything which, in the opinion of a Director, exposes anyone or the forum itself to legal liability in the United States, Australia, or Canada.
For example:
- Child pornography, including fictional or written material;
- Slander or libel, or any false or malicious statement against a person;
- Hate speech: advocating genocide, incitement of hatred, and similar things;
- Harassment, such as stalking, threatening behavior, or exposing another person's personal information;
- Copyright infringement, like linking to illegal torrents or scans or posting anything like that on this site.
Do drivethru accept gift card?
The rule is 'dont moderate arguments you're involved with'. We generally don't moderate threads we're involved with, but that isn't a hard rule.
You have a thousand posts on this site, and you never read the rules? The ones which are literally linked at the top of every single page?
Also yes i havent read the rule on this site or SB if ever
The only i know off is dont flame and dont troll your fellow SV/SB
Also no porn