- Location
- Denmark
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Which isn't related to what I was saying. In fact, I agree with that!
I was saying that if something involves engineering, it involves applied physics.
He said the story referenced is a mix of magic and engineering (which, again, really just makes it engineering that uses magic), but doesn't require thaumaturgy to be applied physics.
In Denmark, we have a saying that's called "Goddag med et økseskaft", which becomes "Hello with an axe-shaft" when roughly translated. This does not in fact refer to our tendency of breaking down the doors of our enemies with axes before we plunder their cities and steal their women/men/children/pets/stuff that isn't nailed down/bolts that nail stuff down, but is instead a fancy way of saying "we're talking past each other, so much right now".
And I believe that's our problem right now.
Because I don't think @Omicron actually subscribes to the "everything is magic" view of Creation. I believe that he does see a distinction between magical or mundane, while you (and I for that sake) subscribe to the "everything has a god, and everything is an interaction between those" view of Creation. Thus, to this view of Creation, he did indeed contradict himself, but in his view of Creation, there is no such contradiction because there is a legitimate difference between magical and mundane as opposed to our view, where mundane is simply another way of saying magical.
I hope this is the correct interpretation of his stance and views anyways, I don't actually have a path into his mind that lets me speak for him.
Sadly, because if I had, I'd use it to steal all his homebrew ideas and do writeups for them before he did, and then I would laugh at him for I had attained sovereignty over his homebrew, and thus I had attained sovereignty over him.
Or not.