He seems to understand Orcs well enough to realize that if he just accepts it and goes with it they can do impossible things to the point that he has been banned from using them. So I don't think magic in and of itself is the hangup.
The ban for orks is because if he's not paying attention/has a lot active then they start to act like orks. Ie super violent hooligans. Doing the impossible doesn't seem to come into it. Plus, orks doing the impossible is really overstated.
 
The ban for orks is because if he's not paying attention/has a lot active then they start to act like orks. Ie super violent hooligans. Doing the impossible doesn't seem to come into it. Plus, orks doing the impossible is really overstated.
They can continue to fire after their magizines have run dry/ had it destroyed. They can continue to fly a plane that has had its wings shot off, how is it being overstated?
 
They can continue to fire after their magizines have run dry/ had it destroyed. They can continue to fly a plane that has had its wings shot off, how is it being overstated?
And then they need to reload or they crash when shot. 40k isn't consistent with how much they can warp reality, and it also seems to require many orks for that to start to happen.

Also, as I said above, the implication from the author seemed to be that the problem was orks acting like orks (violent hooligans).
 
I think he's even imported a few things from Aleph, for a rainy day.


On a wider comment on the story as a whole, I think that one thing that some people are missing is that while yes, temples did fight oni, warlords, and other forces of evil, they also worked with them quite often. It was honestly more of a fifty/fifty split than anything. Which kind if shows the difference in cultures. In Western myth and religion, a church working with demons for any reason at all would be damned as heretics. In Eastern folklore and religion, such things are actually common, so long as the creature or force in question is not a threat to those under the temple's protection.
 
The less biased answer is that a chunk of the posts were things like "dawwwwwwww" or "I like this chapter" or "Praise the sun" just posting the viewer count and some general derails that had nothing to do with the story, like how the romance subplot in the Hobbit was handled and whether it was a good thing to add or not. This went on and the a mod noticed and asked for better quality posts, for lack of a better phrase, and then SB decided that enough time passed that they could continue posting things that could instead have been replaced by clicking like, then the next mod came in and the cycle continued. The third, yes this happened three times, was Connor who is a Super Mod and more or less laid down the law and explained why he did so, one of them was that the owner of the forum was annoyed at the spam coming from this story. The biggest rule is that if you post a "praise the sun" meme or something is had better be preceded by actual content in said post and not just "another +1" type of posting.
It's like they don't know what a goddamned forum is or something. *sigh*

SB go through this sort of bullshit on a regular basis every couple of years. We'll just have to be patient and wait for its staff to get bored of being literary elitist dicks again.
 
It's like they don't know what a goddamned forum is or something. *sigh*

SB go through this sort of bullshit on a regular basis every couple of years. We'll just have to be patient and wait for its staff to get bored of being literary elitist dicks again.

To be fair that forum does have anti-spam rules built in and again the very owners were having problems with it, so really I can understand wanting to cut down spam, it costs more money to save more posts and if a lot of posts are just something that could be replaced by clicking on the like button then I too would be mad at spending money for pretty much nothing.
 
To be fair that forum does have anti-spam rules built in and again the very owners were having problems with it, so really I can understand wanting to cut down spam, it costs more money to save more posts and if a lot of posts are just something that could be replaced by clicking on the like button then I too would be mad at spending money for pretty much nothing.

Basically this.

It's something that I understand why it's happening, but I don't exactly have to be happy about it. Particularly since, as per the rules of nails sticking out, Constellations got hammered on first and hard. And now it's under the Mod of Damocles, so even short-lived, mild derails (the Hobbit example had already ended by the time a Mod stepped in) get blown up over.
 
To be fair that forum does have anti-spam rules built in and again the very owners were having problems with it, so really I can understand wanting to cut down spam, it costs more money to save more posts and if a lot of posts are just something that could be replaced by clicking on the like button then I too would be mad at spending money for pretty much nothing.
Basically this.

It's something that I understand why it's happening, but I don't exactly have to be happy about it. Particularly since, as per the rules of nails sticking out, Constellations got hammered on first and hard. And now it's under the Mod of Damocles, so even short-lived, mild derails (the Hobbit example had already ended by the time a Mod stepped in) get blown up over.
While I agree with SB rules, they basically decided to be utterly draconian to Constellations. Yes, they claim it was just the first thread to receive the hammer, but I can't help but notice that it was also 1) a fast-moving thread at 2) a time that SB began implementing new-thread limits to reduce server load. This makes me suspicious that there was ulterior motives to target Constellations, and the mods just used it as a visible example. This certainly isn't helped by the fact that Constellation was and is still a very positive-attitude thread, when other just as long threads in CrW often devolve into nastiness.

In the end, the SB mods language is very discouraging of pure emotional reactions. This pretty much sanitizes discussions into dry analysis, if you don't want to draw mod attention. And since SB only has a "Like" button, I split time here on SV, where there's a bit more freedom of expression.

With that out of the way: UnwelcomeStorm, how could you go from the sheer hilarity of obaa-sans (and dogs) on Segways to the sad Armsmaster?! Don't keep us on this emotional rollercoaster!
 
Basically this.

It's something that I understand why it's happening, but I don't exactly have to be happy about it. Particularly since, as per the rules of nails sticking out, Constellations got hammered on first and hard. And now it's under the Mod of Damocles, so even short-lived, mild derails (the Hobbit example had already ended by the time a Mod stepped in) get blown up over.

Yeah, I'm fine with the small one liners and the posts consisting of nothing but a picture being frowned upon.

But to shut down posts because all they do is convey the emotion of the poster? What, me pressing 'Like' is supposed to convey all the feelings I have for this wonderful story? Yeah, no.
 
On a wider comment on the story as a whole, I think that one thing that some people are missing is that while yes, temples did fight oni, warlords, and other forces of evil, they also worked with them quite often. It was honestly more of a fifty/fifty split than anything. Which kind if shows the difference in cultures. In Western myth and religion, a church working with demons for any reason at all would be damned as heretics. In Eastern folklore and religion, such things are actually common, so long as the creature or force in question is not a threat to those under the temple's protection.
Examples of temples/churches teaming up with "demons":
Hellsing, Ushio and Tora, and Touhou Project.

There are probably way more examples.
 
Meh, at least isn't not another anime subforum debatacle. That killed one of my stories because I couldn't find the damn thing. (Zelda/Naruto, it got pingponged thrice, I think)

If they are going to be THAT draconian maybe they should, instead of handing out infractions like assholes, issue warnings and if the post ain't beefed up, delete it.

But...back on topic

You know what is needed?

Good doG licking Hunter!Taylor's face.
 
Except they did post warnings, three to four times with three to four mods doing warnings. Then there was a banner that has to be seen before posting and people still continued to post spam.
 
If they are going to be THAT draconian maybe they should, instead of handing out infractions like assholes, issue warnings and if the post ain't beefed up, delete it.
They did. Multiple times. Really, they're not unreasonable; all you have to do is have something to say other than spam. Just putting a good joke in your post is enough to get over the line.
And yet it didn't work.
That's the posters fault. Yes, they're the Fun-Police, but they were getting Fun-noise complaints and they refused to turn it down.
What does that mean for Saitama vs Skitter?
I do believe that they had an episode about something like that. There were explosions.
 
Last edited:
And then they need to reload or they crash when shot. 40k isn't consistent with how much they can warp reality, and it also seems to require many orks for that to start to happen.

Also, as I said above, the implication from the author seemed to be that the problem was orks acting like orks (violent hooligans).
It's actually pretty consistant. They can keep doing things as long as they don't realize that they're not supposed to be able to do them. I think it's said that the Orks are all minor psychics so that's what allows them to pull their stunts off, only they don't know that so as long as they don't notice things like "my clip shouldn't have lasted this long" or "did I see a wing fall off my plane?" they can keep going like nothing happened.

Orks are the Loony Toons of Warhammer.
 
...yeah, lets NOT bring the Lady of Pain out of sigil alright? I mean your not wrong, the End Bringers are no longer problems but...well...Lady of Pain outside of Sigil?
 
I... am fairly certain I can't answer that on this board?
You keep saying things like this, yet I never see you around in Sufficiently Sexy, the NSFW subforum...


I just wonder, could he play a blatantly, unfairly overpowered figurine? Is the empowerement perhaps more dependent on if he considers it 'fair' or not? I'm not arguing he should get a Cthulhu figurine or something, but I'm sure there are figurines with feats and resistances that makes them an absolute bitch to take down for anyone but the most prepared munchkins.
His best bet would be to find something that's basically an if-I-play-this-I've-basically-won figurine - the tabletop equivalent of Yu-Gi-Oh's Exodia, The Forbidden One, or any of Magic: The Gathering's 10+ mana creatures: basically, if not literally, unbeatable, because they're supposed to be really hard to get out into play in the first place but a win condition if you do.
 
Is there a figure for the Ebon Dragon? For WhiteWolf "FUCK YOU, Logic!"
I'm pretty sure that the Lady is a better choice. If she doesn't like you, you die and she leaves. If the Ebon Dragon doesn't like you, he fucks over the entire setting. And if he does like you, he fucks over the setting. It'd be like summoning the Chaos Gods.
 
Back
Top