Leaf Fight delayed progress for a while, but it was worth the laughter.
the laughter was worth it
a replica of Vista's green lenses over her eyes, just visible
visor
cursed and she growled, a bone-trembling sound like thunder
shaking
She barely saw Oni Lee kneel down, through the well of tears:
welling
There was a sudden squall of twisting metal and the back
squeal
and the pair of lots was now covered in stacks
were
 
the laughter was worth it
This edit switches around the emphasis of the sentence.
The lenses in her visor, though? Also the original use of lenses humanises the wearer, as, as with sunglasses and corrective glasses, they are usually considered part of the person and you can make eye contact through them. Visors tend to be more anonymous and have a separation from the person beneath.
Bone-trembling works here, as it implies a lesser or more subtle movement
She isn't having tears welling up, she is seeing through the well of tears in her eyes - when your eyes have tears in them, that is the well of tears. This is a fairly specific descriptor.
In the original squall, there is not just the sonic component, but also the storm of metal implying both violence and movement.
Was is correct. A pair of something is singular.
 
... No, scissors are as well. You don't say "the scissors is still in the package," you say "the scissors are still in the package."
The fuller quote of the original is "the pair of lots was now covered in stacks of lumber" which is still better than the change. Explicitly saying something is a pair changes it - my pants are on the floor, but my pair of pants is on the floor.
 
You don't say "the scissors is still in the package," you say "the scissors are still in the package."
You're right, but I wasn't talking about "scissors", but about "a pair of scissors" The former is plural, the later singular. The question is not if "scissors" is a plural or singular noun, it's if the collective noun "pair" is a plural or singular noun, and the answer is - sometimes one and sometimes the other, in the case of "a pair of scissors" it's singular.

Explicitly saying something is a pair changes it - my pants are on the floor, but my pair of pants is on the floor.
Actually "Pair of pants" is one of the cases where it remains plural, despite the use of the collective noun.
 
Last edited:
Another slang for beer is 'liquid bread', and it was more literal in many instances. I heard Old Nordic people uses beer instead of water when they made their dough.

I could be wrong, though.
It was called Liquid Bread because the ingredients that went into making bread were also used to brew beer (wheat, yeast, water), and it was widely drunk, even women and children drank beer with a lower alcohol content as that was the best way (at the time) to sterilize river water so it could be safe to drink.

The Ancient Egyptians literally saw beer as one of the essential things men cannot go without, so much so, that wages paid to free labourers included beer and that a slave owner was, by law, required to make sure their slaves had beer to drink.
 
Last edited:
Yay! Updates! Woo!

Now if only Good doG could take care of the S9 and the Endbringers...then maybe everything will be just in the world.

Ammy vs. Behemoth : Bemmy sticks his head up and an asteroid of ice piledrives him into the ground. :whistle:

Ammy vs. Ziz : Ziz starts to deorbit, looks at the future, shoots back to orbit and stays. Possibly because when Ammy looks at her she sees a large chicken. :grin:

Ammy vs. Leviathan : anywhere he goes for his water shadow and tidal waves can't get within a mile - he hides in a deep trench and sulks.
:)

As for the S9: I gotta do research but I know that Bonesaw and Burnscar would be reverted to their proper selves (possibly by an interaction of CUUTE DOG) but

Jack: Knocked out as Ammy goes past to run over Cherish and lick the other girls to normality

Mannequin: now a Mannequin statue

Siberian: face full of fur while Taylor paints bindings on Manton

Shatterbird: every time she tries to sing she gets a hairball (Yes dogs get those as well)

Crawler: Battered into the bay

Cherish: doG slobbered
 
The fuller quote of the original is "the pair of lots was now covered in stacks of lumber" which is still better than the change. Explicitly saying something is a pair changes it - my pants are on the floor, but my pair of pants is on the floor.
This is correct for objects which are both a singular object and a pair, I.E. Glasses and varying eyethings (contacts are disjointed, and thus can be singular, and anything else is composed of two joined lenses {Monocle<->Glasses/Monogoggle<->Goggles/Monocular, aka Spyglass, aka Telescope<->Binoculars}) Pants and most varieties of underwear (the thong and g-string are exceptions due to not having legs to speak of, and pants are composed of two joined pant legs,) and scissors (composed of two joined scissor blades {KLK intensifies}). Lots, however, are multiple distinct objects which can be separated without changing their very nature, and thus are plural whenever speaking of more than one. "The pair of lots were now covered in stacks of lumber," not "The pair of lots was now covered in stacks of lumber."
You're right, but I wasn't talking about "scissors", but about "a pair of scissors" The former is plural, the later singular. The question is not if "scissors" is a plural or singular noun, it's if the collective noun "pair" is a plural or singular noun, and the answer is - sometimes one and sometimes the other, in the case of "a pair of scissors" it's singular.
Ah, you're right on this point as illustrated above, my bad.
Actually "Pair of pants" is one of the cases where it remains plural, despite the use of the collective noun.
This is actually both right and wrong. A pair of pants is countable and singular, because you use "pair" to count, so you may have two pairs of pants, but you can't say you have two pants, because pants alone is uncountable. Fish is an exception because it doesn't have a plural form, yet it can still be counted, as Dr. Seuss wonderfully illustrated. Most liquids are uncountable, as you can't count a single water to have multiple waters. Lots are none of the above, as you can have one lot, three lots, many lots, or just a pair of lots.

Interestingly enough, cards are the weird exception, as the collective takes over plurality or singularity despite each card being distinct and individual. The best example is Texas Holdem, where a pair of cards is dealt face-down to each player, and then three cards are dealt face-up on the center of the table.

Edit: Cards are weird... "A pair of cards are dealt face down to each player" is just as correct as the other way, and there's some collective words specific to cards: hand and deck in particular.
 
Last edited:
Sunny vs... Beer Battered Fish:

"Sunny! What are the rest of us going to eat now?!"

"Awwooooooo?"

"Is your dog drunk?!"

"... Yes"

In other words, the beer battered fish turned out pretty good. I'm kind of glad I went to the effort of hand breading the fillets. So much better then the pre-breaded stuff you find in the freezer section of the grocery store. I also got to see my friend faint in horror again upon seeing me using beer to cook instead of drinking it.

He did enjoy the end result though, both the fish and the beer bread.
 
You know, each time I think of Okami, I can't help but wonder what would Ammy reaction to nasuverse Tamamo be? On one hand, Ammy has been slaughtering Yokai left and right. On the other hand, nasuverse Tamamo is... well... she is Ammy. So... Horrified? Insulted? Curious? Friendly? I can't figure it out.
 
Last edited:
All that makes me really, really glad to be a German speaker. That language at least makes sense most of the time. I mean, why is it called a pair of pants? Can't you call it one pant?

In part this is because originally a pair of pants was two separate objects (one for each leg) which connected together when you put them on. The term is a holdover. Even so, the word "pants" is, with a few exceptions (such as Pant suit) always referred to as a plural.
 
Could be worse. At least English doesn't give a gender to things. French is a pain in the ass of a language.
German does too. And unlike French, we have three genders.

Eh, English speakers do tend to personify things. Ships are referred to as female, as are cars by many people. In fact vehicles in general tend to be personified as a female.
Just like that. Gendered languages are just consequent in the application of that concept.
 
You know, each time I think of Okami, I can't help but wonder what would Ammy reaction to nasuverse Tamamo be? On one hand, Ammy has been slaughtering Yokai left and right. On the other hand, nasuverse Tamamo is... well... she is Ammy. So... Horrified? Insulted? Curious? Friendly? I can't figure it out.

nasuverse Tamamo would get Ammy's patented 'make life better' treatment, aka Ammy doing everything in her power to make up for the person's streak of horrible luck. She might not make the person have the life of luxury, but they will be happier than before.
 
Ammy vs. Behemoth : Bemmy sticks his head up and an asteroid of ice piledrives him into the ground. :whistle:

Ammy vs. Ziz : Ziz starts to deorbit, looks at the future, shoots back to orbit and stays. Possibly because when Ammy looks at her she sees a large chicken. :grin:

Ammy vs. Leviathan : anywhere he goes for his water shadow and tidal waves can't get within a mile - he hides in a deep trench and sulks.
Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if the Endbringers are the one thing Sunny can't goof her way through. Not only are they obscenely powerful and mercilessly cunning, but they are also wholly unnatural; no part of any god or spirit of this Earth went into their making.
I'd kind of like to see her show up to the pre-Leviathan gathering, Sun Wheel affixed, red markings flaring, and for the first time ever dead serious, because this is the beast that destroyed Kyushu and ruined her homeland, and she's not going to sit idly by this time. It may not quite fit with the tone of the story so far, but it would be a good way to really show that under all the Floof and Goof, she's still a fucking goddess.
 
Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if the Endbringers are the one thing Sunny can't goof her way through. Not only are they obscenely powerful and mercilessly cunning, but they are also wholly unnatural; no part of any god or spirit of this Earth went into their making.
I'd kind of like to see her show up to the pre-Leviathan gathering, Sun Wheel affixed, red markings flaring, and for the first time ever dead serious, because this is the beast that destroyed Kyushu and ruined her homeland, and she's not going to sit idly by this time. It may not quite fit with the tone of the story so far, but it would be a good way to really show that under all the Floof and Goof, she's still a fucking goddess.

And would fit the characterization from the game perfectly. You know, goofball most of the time but gets serious for the Big Stuff.

Actually, she got serious on All Hollows Eve too. Including the nights leading up to it. And on All Hollows Eve she went patrolling while Taylor was safe at the shrine entertaining the neighborhood (and Wards).
 
Back
Top