Guys, this isn't even tangently related to BB. Please stop and bring this to the KC ideas thread.
Just sorta waiting for JMP to update again so we don't have two of my omakes in a row because that always makes me feel awkward
If I'm reading some of these sources correctly, we still had Mk 14 torpedoes *in service* in the 80's and there are conflicting sources that say we either still have them in storage or transferred them to foreign users (evidently the Mk 14 is still in use in some places). So I'm wondering, with the whole leveling effect and such, how difficult would it be to take those out of storage, fit airdrop kits to them, and use them from A-10's as torpedo bombers. In fact, I would think that the A-10 would be a brutally effective anti-abyssal platform. Massive ordnance capacity (load them up with slicks or aforesaid Mk 14 airdrop kit... Boeing would be hungry to develop something like that, I'm sure)... and the GAU-8 is different only in rate of fire from late-war heavy caliber air-to-surface artillery ordnance. I would imagine that the GAU-8 would, even after the leveling effect, be no less effective than the 75mm howitzer on the solid-nosed B-25's...
Not for the dakka, I doubt the GAU-8 would be a sink-threat to anything apart from DD's, but it would do a number on exposed AA guns and optics. The important part in my mental calculation is that if they can fit air-droppable anti-ship torpedoes (and I guarantee that the entire aerospace mil-ind complex is going to be scrambling to develop them as anti-abyssal systems) on the hard points, then the A-10 becomes an extremely flak resistant torpedo bomber with a nose sting equivalent to the solid-nose Mitchells. The only weakness would be against fighters due to the leveling... so if I were a clever aerospace engineer type, I'd remember the lovely A-10B two-seater, along with my World War II history... Avenger style rear turret anybody? Vulnerable still from below and behind, but from above you got the dakka spewing monster of a GAU-8, and can probably fit a twin .50 in a rear cockpit-replacement turret to cover above and rear, and suddenly the putative A-10 torpedo bomber becomes... potentially lethal.
Wouldn't nearly be as effective as BB shipgirls to counter the threat, but would be a stopgap solution until there are more of the truly effective anti-Abyssal counters.
*sigh* No, Thor, not hitting at the equivalent of a 75mm firing at that rate of fire, I think a 1 second burst of the GAU-8 would, due to the leveling effect, be roughly *equal* to the effect of a single shot of the 75mm. Again, it's not a panacea, it's not an I Win button, it's a stop gap 'throw excrement at the wall and see if SOMETHING sticks' sort of solution. What I'm trying to do is recreate a WW2 land-based torpedo bomber with minimal airframe changes, a ersatz Beaufighter so to speak. Not to create something overpowered and out of context.
What I'm thinking, these make their approach on the deck, tail gunners working to keep enemy aircraft off their tails while the pilot wiggles in to spray the target with 30mm to suppress flak as they come in low and slow (there's a hard limit on maximum airspeed velocity to safely drop a torpedo after all), ripple off the torpedos, and turn away. I'd expect losses to be heavy, effectiveness to be low, but at least somewhat greater than zero.
See my above comments.Can you come up with a single factual counter to the efficacy of air-dropped unguided anti-ship torpedoes against Abyssals? If not, then why be insulting, if so, elucidate please.
From a significance standpoint, the 30mm gun would be useless against Abyssal due to having to enter the Anti-aircraft envelope of Abyssal warships. The A-10 is tough, but it's not designed to handle Dual-Purpose 127mm guns. Trying to do a strafing run on an Atlanta-class Abyssalized light cruiser isn't useless. It's a death warrant for the pilot.Are you arguing that a 30mm gatling will be useless, when in World War 2 .50 MGs proved effective at sweeping the decks of warships and causing significant damage to light AA mounts? If not, then why be insulting, if so, elucidate please.
*Beats a barely recognizable mass that may have been an animal of some sort**the sound of hammering on railroad tracks echoes in the distance*
This meme may be stale, but by god, I will still use it!
Oi, that's my horse!*Beats a barely recognizable mass that may have been an animal of some sort*
Look, it's not even that. We've had discussions about the A-10 being used before in the thread and it's been brought up again and again. Thing is though, the A-10 would need to get into the AA envelope which would be death as it was never designed to survive hits like that. Trying to find ways around the issue though is not a problem. And there is more planes then just the A-10. However, there is a use for the A-10 though. It's pretty good at surviving storms so if they need to track Abyssals in a hurricane, they probably could use it to do so easily.
Or they could use the planes designed for flying through hurricanes? You know, hurricane hunter planes?Look, it's not even that. We've had discussions about the A-10 being used before in the thread and it's been brought up again and again. Thing is though, the A-10 would need to get into the AA envelope which would be death as it was never designed to survive hits like that. Trying to find ways around the issue though is not a problem. And there is more planes then just the A-10. However, there is a use for the A-10 though. It's pretty good at surviving storms so if they need to track Abyssals in a hurricane, they probably could use it to do so easily.