A Little Vice (Trans Magical Girl fic)

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
"my uncle's been in a mood lately" oh and we kill him? We kill him before you drag C into a life of being subject to that too???
Michael: Oh, the Saints aren't killers. Me on the other hand...
Hm yeah I keep coming back to this Lupin talks like someone in a cult because ey are.
That whole confrontation later. Isn't going out to try to recruit people and getting rejected part of how cults enforce separation from others?
Inessa I'm sorry your Soap Opera NTR Moment is very funny, but you're like a Pikachu to me.
Just now realized her silly disguise. Wonder how much was shown onscreen. All the hints ey're Avaritia? The trans foreshadowing? Lupin Keeping the dress for C obviously will mask it, but ey gave the earrings.
Yet another Goth GF is just a nerd who doesn't get out much...
Another?
Yeah that whole. Fuck you got mine energy. Really wafting off Lupin.
C gets the kid to calm down with time and compassion and Lupin bulldozes in to help faster even when it causes distress...
And no one really dies in these attacks, hm, hmmm.
The only reason they fail to cause harm is because of the opposition of the Angelic Saints, and even Avaritia's damage control seems based on the praxis the Resinner will be dealt with sooner than later, because the monsters of the week operate as one off weapons, thrown bombs, there's no effort to preserve them (at least as far as we've seen) and they're creations of opportunity rather than plan.
Yeah, it's understandable ey're focused on their wants and desperate to stop what ey went through from happening to others, but you can see how careless ey are with the civilians. No one died, but how much physical and mental damage do they take? Kinda wondering how eir arc will go, as the realization of all this is sure to hit like a speeding train.
 
Last edited:
But now you might be wondering, hey, why is Avaritia the least a Beast ey can be when ey's doing the hypocritical villain thing, and that, brings me to an insightful comment from the letter S:

Sin is about how you see your actions, and, how does Avaritia see eir actions?

I think ey see emself as the hero.

I think ey want to help people be their best self.

I think it's essential to understand that eir foremost goal is to see people never be harmed like ey was.
Avaritia has a very specific idea on what "Virtue" is, and how it relates to society.

As in ey thinks it's society as its whole broken design.

Ey thinks "Oh, big business doesn't let anyone buy medicine that could save lives, that's Virtue in action!" and not like. Corporate Greed.

Avaritia has defined this entire rebellion against the current world order as Sin freeing the little guys from Virtue, but taking out your pain on people who've never harmed you is Wrathful, consuming resources with any concern for what others get is Gluttonous, deciding you can fit kids into a box that's better than what they'd choose themselves is Prideful.
I mostly agree.
Ey seem to have a stance of "What I'm doing is bad, but it's necessary for me to survive, good people have never had to struggle like I have, and really everyone does bad things, people just like to ignore that and pretend that I'm way worse than any of them, but none of them are better than me!"
I'm not sure that Avaritia was arguing that Corporate Greed was Virtue, but rather, in a sense, was arguing that Virtue isn't real? Like, nobody is really a good person (except when they are - but that's ok), and they'll hurt others for not being as "good", all while ignoring or rationalizing the evils they commit, and the evils all around them; Sin/Virtue isn't about action, it's about mindset, and Avaritia's opinion of that mindset seems based on eir childhood; Virtue is hypocritical and restrictive and they're just as "sinful" as anybody else, but think that they're sooo much better.
From that perspective, Sin is obviously the better option, because Virtue is just Sin in denial.
so, before ey is a Beast, what kind of person does Avaritia end up being?

The kind of person the Saints are.
This I fully agree with, I think that's what the latest chapter really highlighted; all of them have paternalistic, for lack of a better term, personalities.
They all think they know how to help C best, though the Saints are probably better about trying to help C help themself for the most part.
 
Last edited:
Lupin seems to genuinely want good things, and her speech is undeniably positive, the real question though is that it doesn't track with what Micheal is saying, and thus there's some confusion

I'm leaning on the side of "just because Superbia is a dick doesn't mean Avaratia isn't right about a lot of stuff, michael is also cool"
 
I find it interesting when Avarita and Inessa both shut C down without listening to her or looking at her. Whilst discussing her.

Interesting.
I will say this in mitigation on Inessa's part:

When you know your friend is deeply repressed and in denial and will constantly denigrate and belittle themselves or anything good about themselves and just constantly repeat that they are worthless and so on... There comes a point at which bringing them into a conversation about themselves can be a painful load. Because they are in no psychological state to contribute meaningfully, honestly, and realistically to it, because they're so goddamn compulsive about beating themselves up at every opportunity.

It's not, strictly speaking, right to respond to that situation by sidelining them. But it's the kind of situation where the temptation becomes real.

Because navigating the labyrinth of someone else's bad coping strategies and general psychological fuckery can be exhausting, even when theoretically they have a right to drop you into that labyrinth because of their own right to participate in the discussion.
 
But if Inessa became a Saint to fight the Resinners, then basically Avaritia is saying "Hey everything about what my crew is doing is chill, no one gets hurt because you get in the way of our plans, so stop getting in the way of our plans that harm no one!"
Sure is nice that no real-world solutions get branded as useless or harmful because the problem they were made to confront mysteriously went away.


I find it interesting when Avarita and Inessa both shut C down without listening to her or looking at her. Whilst discussing her.

Interesting.
It sucks to be a supporting character.


Based on the earlier exposition about the whole cosmic level of the conflict, it seems the actual rampages are entirely incidental, because the point is that the Resinners existing in all their sinny glory tilts the First Tree in the direction the Beasts favor. They don't monsterize people to fight the Saints, they fight the Saints to make them stop interfering with the monsterization. (And because they have unresolved issues over stupid sharks abandoning them.)
Which brings us back to the question of what the Resinners would do if there weren't Saints around to fight them, which is both important for analyzing what Avaritia is willing to sacrifice to achieve her goals and impossible to answer because the Resinners exist to be magical girl monsters.


Wonder how much was shown onscreen. All the hints ey're Avaritia? The trans foreshadowing? Lupin Keeping the dress for C obviously will mask it, but ey gave the earrings.
There would have to be some foreshadowing that Lupin was Avaritia, the question is how much.
Likewise, Charlie would at the very least need to give off trans vibes for either Temperance's forcefemme jokes to make sense or for "his" transition to the Saints to make sense. Also, several of the conversations he's had onpage were in prominent enough locations that they'd need to be onscreen, and it's hard to imagine any voice actor could deliver some of those lines in a cis manner.


I'm not sure that Avaritia was arguing that Corporate Greed was Virtue, but rather, in a sense, was arguing that Virtue isn't real?
The sense I got was that she sees capitalism as equivalent to virtue by a combination of Superbia's ideology and the transitive property. Superbia says the world is ruled and ruined by virtue; Avaritia sees that the world is ruled and ruined by capitalism; therefore, capitalism is a virtue.
Which is...kinda true, if you define virtue as "the ideals that a society privileges". But that's not the definition that Superbia believes in, so it's not the one Avaricia is working with.

It feels like Avaritia's beliefs are a mixture of good intentions and accurate observations, wrapped around a toxic seed planted by Superbia. She probably used to follow Superbia's beliefs more closely, diverging as she learned more about the world and how to think for herself, but she's still too closely tied to Superbia to truly break from his ideology. Maybe it's a few core assumptions that she hasn't and won't analyze, maybe it's fear about what would happen if she ends up with the wrong conclusions, maybe it's both. But wherever the blight lies, it needs to be pruned before Avaritia can properly blossom.
 
Smh why does Sin have to be evil, why can't she be kinda right and both sides are kinda chill actually save for a few assholes (superpbia and whoever Avaratia is implying was awful to her when she lived in virtue land)
 
There would have to be some foreshadowing that Lupin was Avaritia, the question is how much.
You mean across the story? I meant the date. Inessa saw at least one scene of the date, and the joke of the episode seems to be that Inessa was following them. So a few parts of the date were visually shown, but I'm not sure about the dialogue.
Smh why does Sin have to be evil, why can't she be kinda right and both sides are kinda chill actually save for a few assholes (superpbia and whoever Avaratia is implying was awful to her when she lived in virtue land)
Vice isn't evil. Michael is fine with people not destroying themselves embodying virtue. The whole thing is that the saints are fine with vice existing and being in balance with virtue. Superbia just wants to bring the world into an excess of vice. Avaritia does want a better world, but well, those are just thoughts and words. Eir actions hurt people and support a guy who uses brainwashing incense, which ey acknowledge is somewhat harmful, and wanted C to be, well, a pretty awful person. Just pointing out a few flaws of the world doesn't automatically make you good or right. Ey is saying the Saints side is the establishment that suppresses people, which again is clearly incorrect and contradicts the saints, so both can't be right. All the saints do is free people from brainwashing and stop Superbia from making the tree the way he wants it. And ultimately Superbia is the establishment, forcing people into roles, incentivizing the misogyny and entitlement society produces, and even when utterly disgusted by a prospective recruit, Avaritia still accepted them because those were Superbia's orders. If he is the asshole, then the whole faction is, because he's the one running it, and the others are afraid of defying him. Temperance herself said she felt shame among the Beasts, and accepted herself among the Saints.
Also, we have no idea who Avaritia's other abusers were and they don't seem to have a connection to the Saints.
Take Armstrong from MGR, for example. He has a point that America rotted and was corrupted by the war economy and its rulers (the whole plot of metal gear with the war economy and the American conspiracies is interesting, but I don't even remember much). But he's still the guy who trafficked foreign children to harvest organs and turn them into child cyborg soldiers, wanted a war with a Middle Eastern country to get elected, and his point was that society wasn't good and free for oppressors, at least the ones he approved of, and his desire was to turn America into a social darwinist murder utopia where people can squeeze the blood out of the vulnerable with their own hands instead of having an orphan crushing machine. He insisted Raiden, who fought through the troops of the police and a highly influential corporation and had to cut official ties with his allies to protect them from the fallout, was a conformist following the establishment and should try fighting for his ideals.
Pointing out American society is corrupt and uses soldiers as pawns in power plays doesn't make any of that correct.
 
Last edited:
Smh why does Sin have to be evil, why can't she be kinda right and both sides are kinda chill actually save for a few assholes (superpbia and whoever Avaratia is implying was awful to her when she lived in virtue land)
...I mean, according to the metaphysics of the story, Sin as a force is self-definitionally negative; the power of sin seems to be drawn from a bizarre like... apathetic moral condemnation of oneself? Superbia says "I'm not a good person, so what? I'm perfect as I am, I will not deny my nature, etc."
Avaritia says "I'm not a good person, but nobody is really good, and I do what I do because I need it to survive."
The sense I got was that she sees capitalism as equivalent to virtue by a combination of Superbia's ideology and the transitive property. Superbia says the world is ruled and ruined by virtue; Avaritia sees that the world is ruled and ruined by capitalism; therefore, capitalism is a virtue.
Which is...kinda true, if you define virtue as "the ideals that a society privileges". But that's not the definition that Superbia believes in, so it's not the one Avaricia is working with.

It feels like Avaritia's beliefs are a mixture of good intentions and accurate observations, wrapped around a toxic seed planted by Superbia. She probably used to follow Superbia's beliefs more closely, diverging as she learned more about the world and how to think for herself, but she's still too closely tied to Superbia to truly break from his ideology. Maybe it's a few core assumptions that she hasn't and won't analyze, maybe it's fear about what would happen if she ends up with the wrong conclusions, maybe it's both. But wherever the blight lies, it needs to be pruned before Avaritia can properly blossom.
That reading doesn't make sense to me, to be frank about it.
"Look, we can help you! We know you're not bad deep down! But this isn't making things better, it just hurts people! You could have hurt so many people today. You could have hurt C, like, a dozen times over!"
[...]
"Everyone hurts people, [..] Parents hurt their children to make them act 'right'. Corporations deny people life saving medicine for no reason and that's just 'normal'. But when a person does something right in front of you and you can't avert your eyes fast enough, suddenly that makes them the devil, even if it helps in the end and no one really gets that hurt!"
This doesn't seem like it's condemning Corpos as Virtuous, it's condemning Virtue for not actually caring about evil corporations, and even defending child abuse; "I may not be good, but you're no better."
Hence me saying "Virtue is Sin in denial"; that seems to be how Avaritia sees things.
Avaritia is traumatized, and Superbia is just letting the hurt fester because it serves his own goals.
Like I'd like to point to this other line;
"I'm too greedy to stop her if taking the wrong path helps her work through some things. And she looks a lot happier now, so it's probably working out for her. [...] But [..] They should know that I'm greedy enough to take her back the moment that she finds out exactly where that road leads.[...]"

"That doesn't seem very greedy," I fired back instead.

"Of course it is! It's the greediest thing of all!" There was an undercurrent of zeal in her voice, "To steal a little happiness for yours, even if it means they get to make mistakes and do the wrong thing, that's greedy. Otherwise, why'd everyone care so much about making sure you only get to be happy if you can do it while you look and act 'right.'"

"That," I shrugged, "still sounds more like being nice?"

"I contain multitudes; I am both nice and greedy! It's the best combination you know! I get to be nice to those I like and I don't have to put up with anyone else."
Combined with "Parents hurt their children to make them act 'right'" and "even if it helps in the end and no one really gets that hurt", it seems like to em, Virtue is abuse for "acting out", hypocritical accusations of evil even when they're just trying to help their friends(/co-conspirators), while Greed/Sin is freedom; Ey're too "greedy" to deny Temperance agency, to deny her from acting "wrong".
Until C presses em on the point, ey don't even distinguish between being greedy and being nice, and even then that response is a deflection!
and ey're so convinced that Temperance is gonna get burned by the Saints, after which ey'll get to jump in and save her from the mess she's in; another action ey consider greedy. That's defo cope, but cope does still require some internal consistency.
To em, Virtue justifies child abuse, while Greed justifies the feeding of starving children.
 
Avaritia says "I'm not a good person, but nobody is really good, and I do what I do because I need it to survive."

That reading doesn't make sense to me, to be frank about it.

This doesn't seem like it's condemning Corpos as Virtuous, it's condemning Virtue for not actually caring about evil corporations, and even defending child abuse; "I may not be good, but you're no better." Hence me saying "Virtue is Sin in denial"; that seems to be how Avaritia sees things.
It feels like you're assuming that Avaritia worked out eir beliefs from first principles, and are trying to find those first principles. I don't think that's what's going on; I don't think there's a consistent set of principles behind Avaritia's worldview. That is the core point I was trying to make, which is why I emphasized the contradictions in eir beliefs.
Superbia says the world is ruled and ruined by virtue; Avaritia sees that the world is ruled and ruined by capitalism; therefore, capitalism is a virtue.
Which is...kinda true, if you define virtue as "the ideals that a society privileges". But that's not the definition that Superbia believes in, so it's not the one Avaricia is working with.
I didn't say "Avaritia believes that capitalism is a virtue, and that's why corporations are bad". I said "Avaritia believes these two things, therefore ey believes a third thing, which doesn't square with this fourth thing ey believes".

Why do I think Avaritia's beliefs are self-contradictory? There are a lot of reasons, but one of the big ones is the "magic HRT" (and turning C into an Abyssal Beast more generally) goes against one of her major stated beliefs. Avaritia thinks of self-determination as one of eir core values, that embracing what you really want is more important than bowing to outside pressure. But Avaritia also thinks ey know what people want well enough to force what they want on them...even when it goes directly against their stated desires.

Avaritia condemns the world for forcing Charlie to be a guy because that's what they think he is, and then ey force C to be a girl because that's what ey thinks she is. This is a contradiction, and a really obvious one—the kind of contradiction you can't get if you think about your own beliefs more than the average teenager or cult member.
But Lupin/Avaricia is a teenager, and whether Superbia is technically running a cult or not, ey're definitely in an ideological high control group. We shouldn't expect eir ideology to be well-developed. We should look at it as-is.

Anyways, let's get back to the core of this discussion. Make sure we're all on the same page about what we're talking about.
  • Shadell posted a new chapter. Yay!
  • RiceRockRekt argued that Avaritia's beliefs are contradictory, arguing that the problems ey see in the world are a result of sin, not virtue.
  • You argued that Avaritia's actual beliefs are that everyone sins, nobody's good, but Virtue thinks they're better, which makes them worse.
  • I argued that the apparent contradictions RiRoRe pointed out come from the fact that Avaritia's beliefs are just contradictory.
  • You said that take didn't make much sense, I argued that you missed my actual point, then I summarized the argument and the summary.
So...yeah. The stuff RiRoRe was talking about looks like a contradiction in Avaritia's beliefs, because it is!

Avaritia believes that the problems with the world come from the dominance of virtue, because that's what Superbia preaches. If ey didn't believe that, ey would be going directly against Superbia's plan. But ey also believe that corporations doing bad things without getting punished is bad, because ey have eyes. When Avaritia argues that the world is rotten, that it needs to embrace vice, ey bring up the systemic violence of the status quo because ey believe Superbia's ideology will make it better.

Does this make sense? No! But it's less absurd than the Libertarians/anarcho-capitalists/etc who have told me that corporate malpractice would go away if there was less government regulation. "The invisible hand of the free market leads to optimal business practices, therefore any suboptimal business practices must be a result of meddling from the government or some other external source, therefore reducing regulations and letting private individuals sue private corporations for private damages would do a better job of preventing companies from dumping toxic chemicals in the river." I am not exaggerating, my brother made almost this exact argument to me, just phrased differently.

Does Avaritia believe virtue is just sin in denial? I dunno, maybe. Does it affect eir actions, or even her other beliefs? Avaritia probably thinks it does, but ey also think that turning someone who has stated that they are not and don't want to be a girl into a girl is a good way to help people embrace their desires. Avaritia does not have a coherent belief system.

Avaritia is a child, not a philosopher.
 
Hmmm... I think you may be misunderstanding me.
I don't feel like I was developing a whole philosophy that Avaritia follows? I was just explaining what I see eir perspective to be, and maybe that was in flowery language but I don't think it was philosophizing. Also, children are not stupid, they're just inexperienced. I'm not much older than the characters in the story, and I don't think what I wrote was a stretch, but then again I am autistic, so maybe that's just me overthinking things.
I just don't see how "child is abused and traumatized under the guise of 'Virtue', but knows that their caretakers don't live up to their own standards in truth, and so sees Virtue as hypocritical and evil, compared to 'Sin', which is what they're raised/told to associate with the 'freedom' that they now (perceive themselves to) have." describes some sort of philosophical process.
At no point does Avaritia say "Virtue is Sin in Denial", and I doubt ey would ever think or say anything approaching that, that was just how I was characterizing eir perspective.

My big contention though is with this;
  • Shadell posted a new chapter. Yay!
  • RiceRockRekt argued that Avaritia's beliefs are contradictory, arguing that the problems ey see in the world are a result of sin, not virtue.
  • You argued that Avaritia's actual beliefs are that everyone sins, nobody's good, but Virtue thinks they're better, which makes them worse.
  • I argued that the apparent contradictions RiRoRe pointed out come from the fact that Avaritia's beliefs are just contradictory.
  • You said that take didn't make much sense, I argued that you missed my actual point, then I summarized the argument and the summary.
Because you seem to completely miss the fact that what I argued doesn't contradict the fundament of RRRs point? To be clear, this is how I opened my first response to RRR;
Perhaps I was a bit unspecific when I quoted the entirety of your response to me, because I was only responding to the first paragraph; the second I don't even disagree much with, and so didn't really comment on.
To clarify further, on the point I was disagreeing concluded with this;
Avaritia has defined this entire rebellion against the current world order as Sin freeing the little guys from Virtue, but taking out your pain on people who've never harmed you is Wrathful, consuming resources with any concern for what others get is Gluttonous, deciding you can fit kids into a box that's better than what they'd choose themselves is Prideful.
And I disagree with none of the words here, I just disagree with how ey see Virtue, and that's the only thing I said.

Actually, the more I speak on this the more I feel this is a distinction without a difference, because;
what I'm saying: Avaritia condemns Virtue for letting corporations get away with being evil, which ey mistakenly believe Sin wouldn't do (because they see Sin as something that empowers the weak, but also because they haven't really thought things through)
(EDIT FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION: I don't think Avaritia has thought about what a post-Sin-Takeover world would be like, but I suspect if you were to press em specifically on Big Pharma, ey'd spew some nonsense about how Sin gives people the power to take their life into their own hands)
you're arguing: Avaritia condemns corporations as a symbol of Virtue, and ey mistakenly believe that once Sin dominates the First Tree, the evils of capitalism, as an element of Virtue, will all be gone (because they haven't really thought things through)
 
Last edited:
'Lupin: We have to match with evil apples it's our trademark.
C: Why would that be our trademark?
Lupin: Oh you know.
C: ...Are you an Apple shill?
Lupin: What the fuck how could you accuse me of that!
C: You said evil apples!
Lupin: I meant the good kind of evil apples!?!"- @RiceRockRekt

Lupine you're sounding like Alex Jones, you never want to sound like Alex Jones. speaking of Alex Jones I want to speak about something vaguely related to him.

Lupines self-contradictory philosophy is kind of something they share with fascism, you see in the first chapter of Robin Evans audiobook (which is free and very good there's also a podcast version) the war on everyone in which he define fascism using a set of points. One of these points was self contradiction with fascism

the philosophy is inherently self contradiction for example:
one of the points is that there is this enemy they can blame nearly everything on all the problems in the world and one day they will totally wipe this enemy out

another point of fascism is-

the eternal war they will always be fighting a war no matter what

but if there's an end to the 'enemy" that means the end of the war;what happens afterwards? this is the contradiction and it's the one Robert uses as the main point the show how contradicting fascism is in its core

Well I'm not saying lupine is a fascist of any sorts what I am saying that their philosophy and the philosophy of bad pride dragon guy probably shares some similarities hell, it is very possible bad pride dragon guy is a fascist anyways.

I did this all using voice types so any issues blame on that.
(Probably made some mistakes when anything this to be more readable)
Iris-Iven-Ibis threw 2 100-faced dice. Reason: You know who Dan and Jordan Total: 131
63 63 68 68
 
Last edited:
All the discussion of philosophy going slightly over my head aside, great chapter, and since things seem to be really heating up in story I imagine we're headed towards the climax by now?

Unless there's a season 2 of course...
 
All the discussion of philosophy going slightly over my head aside, great chapter, and since things seem to be really heating up in story I imagine we're headed towards the climax by now?

Unless there's a season 2 of course...
Seems like we're heading to wards the seasonal climax, since we don't even have a full complement of magical girls and Beasts yet.
 
Uh, why the dice? "You know who Dan and Jordan" does not explain it even if who is a typo for why. Also, you can quote other by highlighting the piece you want, clicking "quote", then scrolling down to the part where you write a comment and clicking "insert quotes". You can pick multiple quotes before inserting them.
 
Uh, why the dice? "You know who Dan and Jordan" does not explain it even if who is a typo for why. Also, you can quote other by highlighting the piece you want, clicking "quote", then scrolling down to the part where you write a comment and clicking "insert quotes". You can pick multiple quotes before inserting them.

1- it was a reference to knowledge fight (they also have a kick-ass theme song though I have yet to hear it or listen to the podcast)

2-I'm aware of that fact that you can quote like that I just literally didn't want to go through all of that just to cut out a small part so I just copy the quotes I wanted and just @ the person
 
relevance?
also, i'm gonna go out on a limb and say the fascism parallels are spurious, and "lupine" probably isn't a fascist.

Ya I do agree with you I just kind of thought the parallels were interesting.

this topic is getting somewhat out of hand so instead I will propose a theory:

C's beast form is actually a Chamera and will gain the ability to literally Stitch the best parts they see in others on to themselves
Iris-Iven-Ibis threw 1 100-faced dice. Reason: Self-hating C Total: 77
77 77
 
Wow there is a lot of engagement on this story. Which is good, but still kind of crazy how everyone is Braking every little detail down.

Also kind of disappointing I'm stuck on such a cliff hanger.
 
Last edited:
why do you keep rolling dice?

edit: you have responded with the 'funny' symbol to this, this is not a joke. please answer the question.
It's just a thing I do there's no like greater reason for it I find it kind of humorous to make a prediction or semi humorous statement and then roll dice that's it
Iris-Iven-Ibis threw 1 100-faced dice. Reason: It only makes me laugh Total: 74
74 74
 
Whelp! It's been longer than I'd like since the update, but I'm finally more or less happy with the next chapter and just waiting to hear back from assorted wonderful betas, so hopefully only a few more days.

I expect people will be pretty happy that the delay was after 9 and (hopefully) not after 10.
 
Back
Top