Edge of Night
12th of January 2007 A.D.
COMMENTARY
Nathanael Cobbler is a relatively young Blampire, given as our data puts him around 200 years old maximum.
First he demonstrates magic, now divination and ancient lore that he really should have no business implying.
Man either has a sponsor, or he's the mouthpiece of Something Else.
We REALLY should have Hellscry'd him. CAN we still Hellscry him?
Going to note that the Sun may be taken as a symbol for Solaroid Exalts.
But that its also a central symbol for Egyptian mythology.
Dude could be guessing of course.
But the divinatory tarot, while invented in Italy in the 15th century for card games, has been associated with Egyptian mythology by occultists.
Capital HE?
Cobbler certainly believes that Charon is a god, apparently. And a male god at that.
Nemty was the Egyptian god of ferrymen. Ra travels through the underworld every night on a boat.
No explicit lies.
I don't see the point of trying to capture this dude, and the thought of letting him go is unpalatable, to say the least. I do worry about the possibility of angering Charon, but at this point Charon should be considering the consequences of angering us.
After all, how neutral are you really when you're providing shelter to a supernatural predator and letting it stash victims in your domain?
I will remind you that in Book 3 Grave Peril, both Dresden and Michael Carpenter held civil discussion with Mavra the Black Court vampire sorceress at a Red Court diplomatic reception without immediately trying to murder her. This didnt stop Dresden and Mavra trying to murder each other in Book 6 Blood Rites.
And then in Book 7 Dead Beat, Dresden was actively working FOR Mavra to retrieve the Word of Kemmler.
Under blackmail, but same point; she was the person who warned him that the Kemmlerites were coming to Chicago.
Interests can align. Even with monsters.
There is as of yet, no evidence to conclude that where we found Mayeda was Charon's domain.
Greek themed construct defenses are not really evidence of anything.
Especially when the Blampire in question was a grave robber who operated along the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea.
He is obviously a factor, but he seems to be overreaching. Besides a captured Nathanael in our kingdom is a hostage if Charon care about Nathanael and if Charon doesn't care about Nathanael we should not have much trouble getting him to forget about it.
I genuinely dont see how you can make that argument.
We have never even met the dude; we just know he's powerful enough that noone is willing to cross him.
He could be a powerful Exalted-era spectre or hekatonkhire pretending to be a god.
He could be the real deal from Greek mythology, which while a god isnt all that if you believe the myths where Hercules spanked his ass. He could be a major god on the order of Odin or a Dragon, cosplaying under an assumed name for Reasons.
He could be Charon from Wraith the Oblivion: the first Ferryman and only Emperor of Stygia.
He could even be an angel, whether proper Fallen or unaligned/grigori walking the Earth; I doubt Mac's unique, and in Demon the Fallen Charon was a rebel Angel, duke and deputy to the archduke Azrael.
A lot of those possibilities could spank our ass quite soundly.
===
He doesnt have to care about Cobbler.
He just has to care about the affront to his guarantees. Mab doesnt care about most randos, but if you break the truce at an Accords Neutral location, she will take retaliatory action because you are breaching her guarantees.
Same deal.
And frankly, given the origins of Black Court vampires as we know them, I would vehemently oppose any plan that involves bringing one into our Hell.
Thats just giving Drakul and potentially the Neverborn a set of breadcrumbs to Sanctuary.
That's splitting hairs. The point of his establishment is that people can meet with assurances they won't be killed or worse by their enemies during negotiations or simply by a hit waiting for them to be present.
Defying that standard has consequences, like people trusting your ability to negotiate less.
Agreed.
Three factors effect us here though:
1) We didn't sign shit, so we're not breaking our word.
2) The defenders are small time compared to basically pissing off the whole planet by attacking Accorded Neutral Ground.
3) We already raided it. If Charon wants his business to be taken seriously he must make an example of us.
We should never do this sort of thing after agreeing to meet someone in such a place, but right now killing him shouldn't be worse for us than what we've already done.
1) You dont have to sign anything to be judged to be breaking custom and law.
If we'd blundered into Mac's place and started shit without knowing about its neutrality, that wouldnt be a defense.
2) The Venetian Canals are acknowledged as a neutral spot in Las Vegas.
The spirit domain we travelled to is neither in Las Vegas, nor acknowledged as a neutral location.
Charon isnt obliged to do anything about it.
3) Like I've said previously, there's no evidence that the spirit domain is Charon's.
Charon presumably helped get Mayeda there.
But he doesnt appear to have assumed any responsibility for his health or fate while he was there.
Note that Cobbler wasnt making any threats or implications about Charon coming after us for rescuing Mayeda.
Because doing so broke no rules.
Only if we attacked him(Cobbler) in the Canals would we have committed an actionable infraction.