Um, I can get his pissing contest over "who helped the Earth more", but why is Paul ignoring what she said about the guy being unsaveable? He went to her for information about it, and was told, he got eaten and absorbed twelve years ago, and Paul is choosing to ignore that because he doesn't want to admit he can't save him, and because attempting to save a decade-old dead guy is worth risking the Terror Thing breaking free (because there will certainly be more room for error if they are trying to extract someone who has been fuses with the creature for so long, rather than just containing it). This is like if they are having the climactic battle with Larfleeze, and Paul decided to try rescuing a couple of the assimilated Orange Constructs, rather than taking Larfleeze down hard, risking everything for relatively minimal gains. I mean, it is one thing if the plan is just "pull the dudes soul out and let him move on to whatever reward awaits", but it sounds like Paul is going to risk the monster escaping, and possibly absorbing him and his friends, on the off-chance that they can resurrect this dead guy who is almost certainly going to be brain-dead.