Ah yes, I thought the name look familiar. I shall direct you to all my previous posts supporting OL's actions as I've already said everything I feel I needed to.
I suppose expecting a valid defense would be too much to ask.
We LITERALLY already went through this when it happened. You want to read the argument again, be my guest. But having the exact same argument again strikes me a bit like spam. I could go quote all my messages to YOU from back then, but again, seems like spam.
All I'm seeing here is that, yet again, England is attempting to perfect death ray technology. Silly England...you'll never get enough sun for that.
Pretty much this. People responding "asked and answered" with reference to where you can find the older askings and answers does not constitute a failure to give reasoned response, unless you go and read the answers and can point out how they fall short in ways that have not already been hashed to death.
You know... For a minute there? I genuinely forgot about the events that led to my coming here.
When comic memories appear to be contradicted by in-universe learning, in-universe learning wins out.
Isis. ISIS is the terrorist group, Isis is the goddess.
Not necessarily.
Kilowog isn't all that creative, but he is powerful. Given that the SI isn't especially motivated, he needed to avoid the confrontation turning into a slugging match.
There was nothing credible said by anyone in OL's defense last time that would have explained away cold-blooded, blatantly unnecessary mass murder...so trying to hide behind that previous failure doesn't actually work as a reply.
By which of course you mean nothing that you would accept.
Well, there doesn't? I know I'm quite happy with the current state of affairs. That's simply an observation, but going by the squawking in response to said observation, there seems to be a desire for a rebuttal without one actually being made.
You seem to be laboring under various misconceptions without actually getting to a point, but I think my favorite has to be telling someone to "get over it" for commenting about a story...while being a reader and commentator on said story.
Oi! What'd I ever do to you? :lol
Ok. Well you enjoy your little superiority games then. I should have guessed.
A VI with a defective murder-boner has functional value to a third party client that would normally be a subject of interest for the aforementioned murder-boner. The "give them a decision" thing was a means of identifying these outliers and eliminating the baseline units in the same process.
That's pretty much the attitude you have to have in martial arts. Someone beats you, or hits you with a technique that you don't understand, and you get all pissy. Just singles you out as unworthy. You hear a lot of "That's cheating." Or "That's not real fighting." from such a crowd.
