Goddammit. Why did I decide it was okay to binge this over the past few days to catch up? Stopped at the Terror Thing arc and catch up right in the middle of this, now I am aching for Moar Nao like an addict. Didn't think I catch up this fast. 
I've said this before, but the problem here is as much with Sir Doyle as with Watson. That last time, Zoat implied that if I wait and see, I'd find that Paul was wrong and it was going to show somehow. This hasn't happened yet, so here we are.
I don't remember saying that.
I was referring to this. And, like I said, I took it as an implication, and the reason I bring it up again is that clearly that wasn't how you meant for me to take it. But quite literally the only reason I felt that my concerns were mollified after that time as because of the implication you didn't intend to make. And so, here we are again.
I'm going to be honest Zoat, you've spent some two and a half years, some thirteen percent of my entire life, building up this Nabu thing. Your entire story is set up to hing on it. And now that we're here... what? Literally everyone that isn't Paul or Constantine has spent three days doing nothing. Paul fills in M'gann and Kon on what he's been doing, and the only meaningful reaction is from Wolf. Paul checks in on Giovanni, and- oh look! -once more all new information on Nabu is negative information, because of course it is. I bet he spends his spare time kicking puppies and setting fire to orphanages. After all, canon doesn't explicitly say that he doesn't, right?
I'm peeved, in case you can't tell. It feels like you want to have your hard-man-making-hard-decisions-while-hard cake without having to deal with any of the backlash from that kind of behavior*. Now, I may be speaking prematurely; you may very well be planning to have some backlash happen. But the longer that it doesn't happen, the more that it feels like it won't.
When I recommend supervillain-esk behavior, an implicit part of that is ending up in conflict with non-supervillains. I recommend it anyway, because that's essentially how I behave IRL, I'm constantly in conflict with people who don't subscribe to my world-view, but I get on fine anyway. But Paul's taken up the behavior style with all of the consequences yet-to-appear. How am I to relate to that?
Paul decided that the best way to solve his problem was with violence, and he was right; all problems could be better solved with violence. He made a token effort to look like he had considered non-violence, but stacked the deck heavily in favor of making sure not-violence didn't really workout, something I do all the time. It helps to take some heat off later, once everything's concluded. It does not remove the heat entirely.
My problem is not, and has never been with Paul's behavior. My problem is with how its presented. He wants the advantages of solving his problems expediently like a supervillain, without the downsides of doing so, and that is purest Power Fantasy.
*I can't figure out how to work the words "and eat it too" into that sentence, but know that they are present in spirit.
I'm not showing that he's wrong and I'm not showing that Nabu was. It is quite possible for different people to agree on the authenticity of the evidence and still disagree on the morality of the decision made. I am trying to present the situation as debatable, and not as one in which one side is definitely wrong.I was referring to this. And, like I said, I took it as an implication, and the reason I bring it up again is that clearly that wasn't how you meant for me to take it. But quite literally the only reason I felt that my concerns were mollified after that time as because of the implication you didn't intend to make. And so, here we are again.
Not at all. Everyone was doing something, most of it just wasn't associated with this because it was a secret mission that actually stayed secret. The SI and company successfully prevented anyone who might have decided to intervene from finding out what had happened.I'm going to be honest Zoat, you've spent some two and a half years, some thirteen percent of my entire life, building up this Nabu thing. Your entire story is set up to hinge on it. And now that we're here... what? Literally everyone that isn't Paul or Constantine has spent three days doing nothing.
They just found out that a good friend of theirs killed one of their superiors and had lied about his plans for eight months. As of now, they're having a frantic discussion on what the heck they're supposed to do with this information. You don't see this because the SI isn't there.Paul fills in M'gann and Kon on what he's been doing, and the only meaningful reaction is from Wolf.
Canonically, Wallace felt all the pain inflicted on his body when Nabu was in control. I've already established that exposure to lots of magic isn't too healthy and if you look at the Helmet of Fate there isn't room for the wearer to eat.Paul checks in on Giovanni, and- oh look! -once more all new information on Nabu is negative information, because of course it is. I bet he spends his spare time kicking puppies and setting fire to orphanages. After all, canon doesn't explicitly say that he doesn't, right?
There won't be some kind of karmic backlash. The SI certainly won't ever come to believe that he was in the wrong. Various other people will react, as they did when the Renegade behaved iconoclastically, and there will be consequences to that.I'm peeved, in case you can't tell. It feels like you want to have your hard-man-making-hard-decisions-while-hard cake without having to deal with any of the backlash from that kind of behavior*. Now, I may be speaking prematurely; you may very well be planning to have some backlash happen. But the longer that it doesn't happen, the more that it feels like it won't.
Everyone always wants to solve their problems with no negative consequences. Power rings just make you better actually doing so.When I recommend supervillain-esk behavior, an implicit part of that is ending up in conflict with non-supervillains. I recommend it anyway, because that's essentially how I behave IRL, I'm constantly in conflict with people who don't subscribe to my world-view, but I get on fine anyway. But Paul's taken up the behavior style with all of the consequences yet-to-appear. How am I to relate to that?
Paul decided that the best way to solve his problem was with violence, and he was right; all problems could be better solved with violence. He made a token effort to look like he had considered non-violence, but stacked the deck heavily in favor of making sure not-violence didn't really workout, something I do all the time. It helps to take some heat off later, once everything's concluded. It does not remove the heat entirely.
My problem is not, and has never been with Paul's behavior. My problem is with how its presented. He wants the advantages of solving his problems expediently like a supervillain, without the downsides of doing so, and that is purest Power Fantasy.
*I can't figure out how to work the words "and eat it too" into that sentence, but know that they are present in spirit.
On balance, he didn't want violence. But f Siskin hadn't been killed he'd have found the whole thing blooming satisfying.Seriously, the Paul bashing by saying he wanted this confrontation is as bad as the Nabu bashing.
So, if Nabu had both the reason and the ability to at least start looking for a successor or a different accommodation/deal with Zatarra the only reason he didn't must be that you as the author didn't want him to?Then again, Nabu had eight months to look into the matter himself, and he had far more reason to get on with it. It would also have been easier for him to do it than it would be for the SI.
So, if Nabu had both the reason and the ability to at least start looking for a successor or a different accommodation/deal with Zatarra the only reason he didn't must be that you as the author didn't want him to?
It's all well and good to say that the SI would accept a peaceful resolution, but both in and out of the story no-one ever thought it would actually happen because everything Nabu did is bad/wrong. This was wholly forced storytelling with just the end-goal in sight.
Stop being hungup on Paragon. Renegade is going to ascend to true protaganist in our hearts if not in actuallity.I was referring to this. And, like I said, I took it as an implication, and the reason I bring it up again is that clearly that wasn't how you meant for me to take it. But quite literally the only reason I felt that my concerns were mollified after that time as because of the implication you didn't intend to make. And so, here we are again.
I'm going to be honest Zoat, you've spent some two and a half years, some thirteen percent of my entire life, building up this Nabu thing. Your entire story is set up to hing on it. And now that we're here... what? Literally everyone that isn't Paul or Constantine has spent three days doing nothing. Paul fills in M'gann and Kon on what he's been doing, and the only meaningful reaction is from Wolf. Paul checks in on Giovanni, and- oh look! -once more all new information on Nabu is negative information, because of course it is. I bet he spends his spare time kicking puppies and setting fire to orphanages. After all, canon doesn't explicitly say that he doesn't, right?
I'm peeved, in case you can't tell. It feels like you want to have your hard-man-making-hard-decisions-while-hard cake without having to deal with any of the backlash from that kind of behavior*. Now, I may be speaking prematurely; you may very well be planning to have some backlash happen. But the longer that it doesn't happen, the more that it feels like it won't.
When I recommend supervillain-esk behavior, an implicit part of that is ending up in conflict with non-supervillains. I recommend it anyway, because that's essentially how I behave IRL, I'm constantly in conflict with people who don't subscribe to my world-view, but I get on fine anyway. But Paul's taken up the behavior style with all of the consequences yet-to-appear. How am I to relate to that?
Paul decided that the best way to solve his problem was with violence, and he was right; all problems could be better solved with violence. He made a token effort to look like he had considered non-violence, but stacked the deck heavily in favor of making sure not-violence didn't really workout, something I do all the time. It helps to take some heat off later, once everything's concluded. It does not remove the heat entirely.
My problem is not, and has never been with Paul's behavior. My problem is with how its presented. He wants the advantages of solving his problems expediently like a supervillain, without the downsides of doing so, and that is purest Power Fantasy.
*I can't figure out how to work the words "and eat it too" into that sentence, but know that they are present in spirit.
Or maybe, and stay with me here, Nabu did here exactly what he apparently did in the show: not look for successors. Unless you can find something from Young Justice that suggests that he was, in fact, looking for other magic users willing to let him sit on their heads?So, if Nabu had both the reason and the ability to at least start looking for a successor or a different accommodation/deal with Zatarra the only reason he didn't must be that you as the author didn't want him to?
It's all well and good to say that the SI would accept a peaceful resolution, but both in and out of the story no-one ever thought it would actually happen because everything Nabu did is bad/wrong. This was wholly forced storytelling with just the end-goal in sight.
So much for the Staff preventing mental contamination.Her eyes flare violet for a moment. That's.. something I'll need to keep an eye on. For as long as I'm on Earth, anyway.
Apparently she never heard about what he did to Clay Face. Or what he did in the simulation.I'd.. probably do the same if-."
"No you wouldn't. You went inside the standing stones and connected to all his fears. You didn't go crazy or start killing people."
Yet I cannot recall any occasion, canon or in this story, where Aquaman has actually called in his army of mages to help.Aquaman? Is married to a high-tier magic-user. And he is the monarch of a nation which is so full of magic users, they're highly relevant in technological circles despite skipping the industrial revolution.
Think you are forgetting someone there. Big guy, flying brick power set, turns into a ten year old when off the clock.Technically, both Diana and King Orin are magic users. Zatara (then Nabu) was the only caster.
All it means is that for some reason he stayed with Zatarra. Either they reached an agreement or he's just puppeting, we don't know.Again, Nabu still seemingly being in Zatara's body by season 5 implies that he never bothered looking into it in canon either so can't blame Zoat for that.
The latest information we have about Nabu is that in canon season 2 he's still on Zatarra. In WTR he had both a reason and ability to look for successors in the 8months after he took Zatarra but he simply didn't. Whether that was due to the rarity of powerful mages, unwillingness from other potential hosts or simply Zoat just not bothering with hinting at anything going on we don't know.Or maybe, and stay with me here, Nabu did here exactly what he apparently did in the show: not look for successors. Unless you can find something from Young Justice that suggests that he was, in fact, looking for other magic users willing to let him sit on their heads?
Clayface eventually mostly recovered, and no once actually died in the simulation.Apparently she never heard about what he did to Clay Face. Or what he did in the simulation.
Paul is by no means reluctant to pull out lethal force when legitimately fearful.
The attack on Poseidonis, and the fight with Oceanus. Mostly off-screen, but I think I mentioned it.Yet I cannot recall any occasion, canon or in this story, where Aquaman has actually called in his army of mages to help.
Oh. Yeah. Him.Think you are forgetting someone there. Big guy, flying brick power set, turns into a ten year old when off the clock.
All it means is that for some reason he stayed with Zatarra. Either they reached an agreement or he's just puppeting, we don't know.
The latest information we have about Nabu is that in canon season 2 he's still on Zatarra. In WTR he had both a reason and ability to look for successors in the 8months after he took Zatarra but he simply didn't. Whether that was due to the rarity of powerful mages, unwillingness from other potential hosts or simply Zoat just not bothering with hinting at anything going on we don't know.
As I said previously, it increasingly seems that the members of the JL are put in stasis between appearances so they change as little as possible from stimuli that should and does reach them.
It seems more likely to me that John will to get a visit from a big, golden dragon than he might get straight answers from a shut-in wizard, and a former hero who became a mad Lord of Chaos."Not unless you know where you can find a Lord of Chaos and a Lord of Order working together."
"Shazam and Oggar. It… It didn't last, but…"
He nods. "Something to look at."
Shush you! You need to get on the Zatanator train.So much for the Staff preventing mental contamination.
Humm… In canon it was M'gann who went slightly off the deap end over the time-skip. Guess here it will be the soon-to-be love fanatic.
Why not, exactly? You explicitly promised and delivered karmic backlash on Renegade, so why does Paragon not get the same?There won't be some kind of karmic backlash. The SI certainly won't ever come to believe that he was in the wrong. Various other people will react, as they did when the Renegade behaved iconoclastically, and there will be consequences to that.
Why not, exactly? You explicitly promised and delivered karmic backlash on Renegade, so why does Paragon not get the same?
It wasn't a karmic backlash, it was the practical downside of the risks he took. I'm not Steve Ditko. I'm not using this story to espouse a particular moral philosophy which always results in the characters getting what they want while their enemies always fail. If a character takes a risk, sometimes it will blow up in their face. If they keep taking risks, eventually one will.Why not, exactly? You explicitly promised and delivered karmic backlash on Renegade, so why does Paragon not get the same?
I don't think that you mean 'otherwise' here.Sure, there's no evidence to say otherwise, but I like that better than the implications of a body slave.
With his tattoos, he's invisible to Rama KushnaWhy not, exactly? You explicitly promised and delivered karmic backlash on Renegade, so why does Paragon not get the same?
Why do people keep saying that Paul wanted to solve things with violence and even stacked the deck in his favor when that is complete bullshit? He was literally hoping that Nabu would just take the freaking Golem body when he first offered it.
First, nobody was talking about forcing Zatanna to do anything. You have to make sure she's OK with it, but at the end of the day she is a minor and she does need a legal guardian. As a 14-year old, it's not actually her decision, and it shouldn't be.Not to mention that they're probably not her legal guardians. If they tried to force her to stay, that would be kidnapping.
The golem was never a realistic solution. Paul doesn't understand Nabu, nor wants to, and never made a serious attempt at communicating with him (or doing so through a third-party, so that the palpable hatred didn't throw off the conversation).
I think if you look at things without being blinded by Nabu hatred, it's fairly obvious that the host is more than just a mount.
Wally West: Right. You're a Lord of Order.
Kent Nelson: Oh, no. Not me. I'm just an old coat Fate used to put on.
. Canon WoG is that Nabu is looking for high magical potential in his hosts, and left it open to interpretation whether the host's moral alignment mattered. A golem had neither.
Youth probably mattered, but to an immortal entity the difference between Zatanna and Zatara's ages may have seemed insignificant.
I'll leave the goodness question to your interpretation.
As for Billy, SPOILER REQUEST. NO COMMENT.