Touhou: Scarlet Devil M̶a̶n̶s̶i̶o̶n̶ Mafia

Should Day 2 be extended by another twenty-four hours?

  • Yes

    Votes: 10 83.3%
  • No

    Votes: 2 16.7%

  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .
End of Night 5/Start of Day 6
The party of nine from where they had entered in the night comes out to a party of seven, all of them looking as two more of their numbers have vanished. And so like every night prior, the two missing are revealed.



The first is revealed as Reisen Inaba, Moon Rabbit on Earth (@Shalmoa), who 'died' from a Knock on the Head.



The second is revealed as Alice Margatroid, Seven-Colored Puppet Master (@dinomannitro6), who 'died' from being Knocked Out In A Closet.

And a message is left upon the table to read.

Reevals needed on Walker's flip
Everyone needs progressions now IMO
Hobo's vote NAI even if late due to self-pres
Other votes probably won't get good info at this point
Not sure if absences are notable right now (Dino/Comi, YP to a lesser extent)
Figure one more affordable miss ATM but needs serious discussion given game length
Probably makes it a good spot to fill out claim space
Wiadi, Comi, Atoms are the only unclaimed ATM
Atoms can clear with N5 Town kill, Wiadi/Comi mech-locked out of Odd-Night TKP

And so the seven members of the party begin the sixth day…

End of Day is at
 
Last edited:
What's up with the vote against Atoms?
No idea at least your Nani Vote serves a purpose of previous accusations, still really don't like the fact you won't claim who you visited last night and (like YP) really don't like how Rosen shut it down further but that might be inexperience talking.
Also you

[x] Vote hugh_donnetono
Get out here and explain as the other two votes said.
 
Keeping my vote on hugh for now, will see if I can find a proper sus target later today but uh don't count on it (not having the best start to the new year sadly :V).

Anyway @Wiadi I'd like opinions on Shalmoa, -Rosen and Nanimani. Also your best scumread rn to get an idea of where you're at because the YP summary post doesn't seem to really sus them that much in the end?
 
Note to self, check people hyping up Bean and see if it correlates with experience at all.
Had a previous name before. I don't remember exactly what the username was, but I recognized it, so yeah, much experience.
Something easily-checked like that would be stupid to lie about.
 
Had a previous name before. I don't remember exactly what the username was, but I recognized it, so yeah, much experience.
Something easily-checked like that would be stupid to lie about.
Yeah, her previous name was Broken Base from what I remember (and I think was discussed either this game or last as well).

This is less about Bean herself and more about other players heralding her experience in playing, and if that might have been a ploy to pull protectives in a more favorable direction. It seems a little fancy for Day 1 but not something I would discount just thinking about my own headspace.
 
Yeah, her previous name was Broken Base from what I remember (and I think was discussed either this game or last as well).

This is less about Bean herself and more about other players heralding her experience in playing, and if that might have been a ploy to pull protectives in a more favorable direction. It seems a little fancy for Day 1 but not something I would discount just thinking about my own headspace.

I think in town world that's what the point of the DV claim was, it was to cast doubt and make her a less attractive target, I think it's a moot point because I want to see how Walker acts now.
 
I think in town world that's what the point of the DV claim was, it was to cast doubt and make her a less attractive target, I think it's a moot point because I want to see how Walker acts now.
Hm yeah, definitely forgot about that again
im so fucking wired up on coffee atm I should not have had that second cup.
Should have given it to me instead I definitely need it at this point :V
 
I would like that reasoning please. Why Zaealix? That wagon came out of nowhere from my perspective.

This is a combination of a few things.
Firstly I was coming in trying to scramble to get everything together for a DnD game about to happen so with no time to look back I had to use the best of my memory and what peeps were saying.
Secondly and primarly I had to rapid think and I remember a fair chunk of hugh suspicions being levied towards flavor posting and Zae had a post on my notes that had bothered me here:

First part of the question, what does that say about the scum team? I figure that says scum is down a man.
Perhaps more importantly I'd expect, for balance reasons, for you to be paired with veterans who in theory were expected to try and defend you, but given the uniformity of the vote against you I'm inclined to say they left you to hang but uhh.
Honestly the nature of your vote being more policy rather then solid suspicion says that the best defense is to probably give people time to doubt rather then overtly defend you. The latter reeks of connection, the former lets town eat itself, and town trends towards self destructing if too much is said by town and scum hides in low posting.

Now, do I think I look suspicious? Maybe more so for you specifically reaching out to me and two others which seems about right in number for a scum team then without you doing that. Especially given my earlier gaffe of calling you suspicious without actually voting you at the time.
*shakes head*
A part of me sees this as an attempt to go down swinging via throwing up false links to get Town to suspect actual town voices, if Scum. If Town…
Victim of being the first one to bleed in a pack of sharks.

I hated this post so much, it expected meta pairing that every scum team must contain vets, provides shoddy reasoning to not pay attention to an active vote and I hate the entirety of the second paragraph on self-discuss.

You are still posting a lot without giving much/any info and you have still placed literally zero votes this game.

They have two meme votes which account to nothing, I frankly am not a fan of this and thank you for pointing it out.

Claiming to have been RB'd is nothing interesting about your role. Just as an example, if I were vanilla, roleblocked, and there was a mafia death that night, I'd probably claim it first thing in the day.

It's situational, but it's probably more inviting of suspicion not to claim it than to claim it.

This. There is almost never a good reason to not claim roleblocked and the situations where you don't are so niche you almost never see them.

Hmm, checking every vote ever placed he's put down two votes, both of which were memes.

So functionally 0.

Wait did I ask Cyri to read himself?

@Cyricubed: Aaaa-! I can't keep people straight in my posts. Swap yourself out for Absum in your version. Thanks.

Logos, Wiadi, Absum is a rough comparison lol. I think Wiadi comes across the best of these I really haven't had any issue with their posts so far so they rank highest town read there. Absum comes next, I've liked absums posts and while there is a point or two I disagree with it's not anything suspicions still a decent townlean there. Logos on the other hand I'm unsure of. Their posts are alright but I also haven't had a lot of games where me and logos are alive at the same time so I can't tell if I'm just being unfamiliar with them or if I'm seeing actual weirdness. For now though they get a light townlean pass.

Want to throw up Ori as probably my highest town read flat out, Hermit right below it.

Hah...

Actually this post is kinda bad, isn't it?

I mean, check your role card? Is that deduction actually correct?

Kinda, I don't like the post but frankly YP has made weirder statements on just making strange ruminatins before.

Though I expect Cyri to be better at tricking me than Logos which is why I'm unsure.

-_- Meanwhile Cyri can never live down winning a serial killer game, and almost winning the one before it...he will forever be marked as a devious trickster, a charleton, and a shuckster.

...pinged cyri right when they appeared to say they are busy...

Massive rip sorry, lol but I refuse to post when my brain is too dead to give proper thoughts.

What's up with the vote against Atoms?

[X] Vote Nanimani

God I forgot Nani was in this game before you re-mentioned them so that's concerning that I've got someone as a "Who" and that there are 2 other individuals (Dino/Roach) so I'm gonna check on them

I agree with sentiments that 99L is now self resolving but I hate leaving 'Self Resolves' like this out.
Hugh on the other hand needs to put in some work towards the actual gamestate and people in it. As it stands they are a buzzing nest of noise with no function and that bothers me and makes me wish I had ended up in this direction previous day.

[X] Vote Hugh_Donnetello

@RoachTV @dinomannitro6 can you both give me a reads list and then when you've completed those review your top two scum reads more in depth view.

@Logos give me your thoughts on how D2 has progressed so far. Is anything standing out?
@Nanimani Have you noticed and strange interactions between players? Anything linking possible?
 
I'm continuing to think about the idea of highrep!Bean in my head and now I'm just getting to the conclusion that Scum played the wine against the idea and won, and one dead Nictis was their reward. Need to stop myself because I don't actually think we'll get good pings from D1 about it anymore
 
I am late. But that is irrelevant, because I am here now. I will begin by ignoring the current discussion, because everything I wanted to say has already been said by other parties. Instead, I will focus elsewhere, with a post I had planned earlier but postphoned for non-game related reasons.

I'd have to remind everyone that I pushed Hugh for information in post #914 and post #919 and got only very slight defenses in posts #916 and #920 as a response. Also, his reaction to my post #887 (his post #889) left me with a sour taste in my mouth, because he answered my question with a deflection. I had only asked him to provide that information because I found his Day 2 casual, low content humor concerning, and I wanted to engage in a discussion on why that might be the case; in response, I only got non-committal, deflective answers. The rest of his Day 2 content was him making comments about him catching up to the thread, grilling Ori for information, and the Rule 1 Discussion.

I still cannot explain his behavior, and he has not given me any other information since then.

(The links are broken because I put this post into my notes. I will not bother finding all of them again)

Hugh's behavior as of now is not alignment indicative. But it is curious. A snap vote and pressure will be enough to garner information as to the why.

Also, I see many people calling out Absum and asking other players for reads on him. I will add that his response to my throwaway Day 1 prodding was emotional enough for me to consider him Slight-Town as of now. Other curious considerations are Atom's silence (which has an unfortunately timed defense because of the festivities) and a prolonged personal bias against Dino for his ping dodging. Other than that, not much new information has been stated, and it's a slow day.
 
btw, -Rosen, how do you feel about dino/atoms?
IMO both need to be more active but right now I'm giving the benefit of the doubt since New Years interfered directly with this Day. Willingness to LHF vote by Day 3 or 4 is there, provided there aren't any reasonable targets already.
 
Also kind of against the Hugh stuff right now, but will say for "reasons" since I don't want to interrupt the reason why it exists in the first place.

Mostly just want it on record that I don't want to see it as an EoD wagon.
 
I think in town world that's what the point of the DV claim was, it was to cast doubt and make her a less attractive target, I think it's a moot point because I want to see how Walker acts now.
The DV claim is pretty easy to prove on my part, as long as we approach an EoD with two acceptable targets within one vote of each other - my vote will push one player above the other despite an even tally.
 
I understand the idea behind it -- it's the same reason I was playing under the assumption that the double vote existed when trying to keep YP off the block for EoD1.

I just don't like it being actively said by the claimed double-voter. I'd much rather see said double-vote already up and not moving around at EoD, for the sole reason that it's so much harder to play around for anybody if it becomes contributory to EoD chaos.
 
Back
Top