Huh? I thought Ashtaroth doesn't have arms?
Also @Flairina , you may want to not bookmark the update today. Or atleast wait until tomorrow to add the (Bad End 1) label to it
Huh? I thought Ashtaroth doesn't have arms?
Huh? I thought Ashtaroth doesn't have arms?
Also @Flairina , you may want to not bookmark the update today. Or atleast wait until tomorrow to add the (Bad End 1) label to it
This is the PMMM setting after all, where teenage angst is so powerful it literally warps reality.
Fixed it for you
Also @Flairina , you may want to not bookmark the update today. Or atleast wait until tomorrow to add the (Bad End 1) label to it
I think she deserves a Darwin Award for that performance.
Like, she was super cautious and methodical about the whole encounter, but the moment she was in any actual danger, she does everything in the most reckless, unthinking manner possible, putting her own safety far behind making absolutely doubly sure that she doesn't harm the other Witch.
Maybe... except that the goal was to determine whether or not the other witch was sapient. If not, then based on past experience it could be concluded that the witch was hostile.Saar: Oh no, this is just my medium angst. You haven't seen anywhere close to my TRUE angst yet. In fact, one might even say...
(I'd apologize, but after the jokes from last update, you couldn't possibly expect me to resist this one. ^^; )
Not quite sure what this means. Reckless how? There wasn't really any chance for Ashtaroth to react/retaliate/re-anything in this update, so I assume you mean the previous one? That still doesn't make much sense; harming the other witch completely goes against the entire point of this little expedition. Yes, Saar attacked you, but if your immediate response was to attack her back, that's like...
Say you're approaching an animal whose species is commonly known to be aggressive and potentially dangerous. Your goal is to gain its trust so it can be transported somewhere else, say... I dunno, a zoo. You don't want to scare it, so you approach with caution and call out to it, hoping it will respond positively. It does not, lashing out, but not actually hurting you. Well, okay, you're encroaching on its space, and of course it's not going to react well to you right off the bat. You try again, and it still responds negatively, injuring you this time. Seeing as you're hurt, you retreat for the time being, opting to either give up entirely, or get away until you come up with a different approach. Makes sense, right?
Now, say your immediate response to it lashing out was to draw the gun at your side and shoot it in the face- no, actually, to make this metaphor more proportionate to the in story situation, let's say you don't even have a gun; you have a bow and a supply of arrows, which will almost certainly just piss the animal off until you score some critical shot on it, thus giving it the chance to retaliate. Congrats, if you're not dead by the end of the fight you just invoked then you're at least mauled, and you now have a dead animal on your hands, have gained absolutely nothing for it, and have some serious explaining to do to the zoo that was supposed to receive it.
Obviously this isn't a perfect equivalent, but do you see what I'm saying here?
Maybe... except that the goal was to determine whether or not the other witch was sapient. If not, then based on past experience it could be concluded that the witch was hostile.
Once Saar lashed out unthinkingly, like an animal rather than a sapient being, that should have been enough to clue Ashtaroth in.
... I'm not sure how much effect the votes have, if any, so I'm not sure if this is an incidence of the players/readers being dumb or the character being dumb. Either way, I anticipate more bad ends in the future.
Compare the chapter titles, they confirm that.An indication of what update we rolled back to would make it easier to understand this update. It looks like this update continues on from the one directly before the bad end; is that correct?
An indication of what update we rolled back to would make it easier to understand this update. It looks like this update continues on from the one directly before the bad end; is that correct?