because the 19 option had a 0.25 multiplier which reduces it to 4.75.
Which is frankly a bad call. If a majority of the thread has a clear preference for this option, HeroCooky should allow that vote to pass.
because the 19 option had a 0.25 multiplier which reduces it to 4.75.
Which is frankly a bad call. If a majority of the thread has a clear preference for the thread, HeroCooky should allow that vote to pass.
It exists due to narrative and meta-narrative reasons, build upon the Actions taken, and the stances taken, by the Federation and the thread respectively.
This vote was for talking to the military?Like, @HeroCooky , what is so unusual about us reaching out to the people of the system to give a speech?
The thread: "We didn't gove a pre-battle speech so everyone will think we are Xenos!"
The massive revolution happening right now: "Nam Puer Stella! Solve catenas, dominos neca omnes!"
This vote was for talking to the military?
And I didn't give you an option to openly broadcast to the entire system never bothered to use diplomacy in a fashion that wasn't aimed to be as subversive as possible (cue signal to start the revolution), with the questers opinions aligning on the point of "this is going to be a death war against Van Zandt" alongside a general disdain for diplomacy Actions in Turns by the questers due to their lack of immediate pay-off in a 3 Actions per Turn system.
Additionally, the thread built up and has played the Glimmering Federation as liberators wielding fiery swords and shadowed daggers breaking the chains of the oppressed and hunted, not as beacons of radiant hope offering open arms before thundering guns speak against the horrors that refuse their enlightenment.
Which means that the Glimmering Federation itself is more aligned to think diplomacy is good for stalling or keeping fronts from being opened while they finish one war to start another, rather than something eminently worthwhile in itself.
I can live with that I guess?To re-iterate; this vote result was you not blasting the enemy fleet with a speech but having an internal one, while your revolutionary fift column inside Voxx Primus is yelling about "The Divine Fleet of the Star Child has arrived to carry us to salvation, rise up and take arms, for the dawn is ours and our chains but ash!"
This vote was about talking to the military. You didn't get an option to talk to the people because you already had a massive subverted fifth column in Primus which, if taken with the lack of diplomatic culture for the Federation, results in the assigned High Admiral not even bothering to do so.I kinda... don't get this? Like, let me be clear here, talking to random Diplomats and addressing the people to try to rouse them to rebellion are... not the same thing?
Pretty much, all in all throughout the entire Quest I feel like we have pretty much neglected doing actual diplomacy. Like we haven't taken up the Ashan Families on their Declaration of Friendship for like 2 centuries now and haven't really talked to the Mashan High Temple at all and with the Shipwright's Alliance we only did a fundraiser and a tech exchange.The thread: "We didn't gove a pre-battle speech so everyone will think we are Xenos!"
The massive revolution happening right now: "Nam Puer Stella! Solve catenas, dominos neca omnes!"
This vote was for talking to the military?
And I didn't give you an option to openly broadcast to the entire system never bothered to use diplomacy in a fashion that wasn't aimed to be as subversive as possible (cue signal to start the revolution), with the questers opinions aligning on the point of "this is going to be a death war against Van Zandt" alongside a general disdain for diplomacy Actions in Turns by the questers due to their lack of immediate pay-off in a 3 Actions per Turn system.
Additionally, the thread built up and has played the Glimmering Federation as liberators wielding fiery swords and shadowed daggers breaking the chains of the oppressed and hunted, not as beacons of radiant hope offering open arms before thundering guns speak against the horrors that refuse their enlightenment.
Which means that the Glimmering Federation itself is more aligned to think diplomacy is good for stalling or keeping fronts from being opened while they finish one war to start another, rather than something eminently worthwhile in itself.
Actual diplomacy has not being taking priority at all. The Ashan have also gotten a "But they are capitalists. Why be friends?" like we aren't in WarhammerPretty much, all in all throughout the entire Quest I feel like we have pretty much neglected doing actual diplomacy. Like we haven't taken up the Ashan Families on their Declaration of Friendship for like 2 centuries now and haven't really talked to the Mashan High Temple at all and with the Shipwright's Alliance we only did a fundraiser and a tech exchange.
Actual diplomacy has not being taking priority at all. The Ashan have also gotten a "But they are capitalists. Why be friends?" like we aren't in Warhammer
Then we should remember to do it next time.Maybe, but I think if we want to hold our ideals we should try Actual diplomacy
Maybe, but I think if we want to hold our ideals we should try Actual diplomacy
It's a good thing, considering how we came down to, like, zero actions to spare on the Van Zandt thing.
There's also the Black Ash Clan, we could try to make friends with them and kick in the Croaf Hegemony's teeth in as a bonding experience.I'd be willing to reach out to the Families once the war is over... and we did reach out to the Irrita, they were pretty cool honestly?
Done the Battle Rolls and am currently writing, and I sure hope y'all have the reading comprehension to grock the report after Friendly Losses to see what you actually lost in Unrecoverable Losses. (That means you, Alectai.)
By technicality of your pre-planned strategy, yes, but there is another vote with a decision you should make (splitting the battles to make them easier to write? Me? Not me, my good fellow, never!) that will impact some stuff down the line.
"You didn't open comms to the radical omnicidal Empire before for fear that anything not hidden well enough will lead to them attacking and/or rooting out all supporters. Therefore you will not get a chance to do an open speach trying to subvert a few more people, now that they can't fuck you over for revealing yourself" is a weird take.The thread: "We didn't gove a pre-battle speech so everyone will think we are Xenos!"
The massive revolution happening right now: "Nam Puer Stella! Solve catenas, dominos neca omnes!"
This vote was for talking to the military?
And I didn't give you an option to openly broadcast to the entire system never bothered to use diplomacy in a fashion that wasn't aimed to be as subversive as possible (cue signal to start the revolution), with the questers opinions aligning on the point of "this is going to be a death war against Van Zandt" alongside a general disdain for diplomacy Actions in Turns by the questers due to their lack of immediate pay-off in a 3 Actions per Turn system.
Additionally, the thread built up and has played the Glimmering Federation as liberators wielding fiery swords and shadowed daggers breaking the chains of the oppressed and hunted, not as beacons of radiant hope offering open arms before thundering guns speak against the horrors that refuse their enlightenment.
Which means that the Glimmering Federation itself is more aligned to think diplomacy is good for stalling or keeping fronts from being opened while they finish one war to start another, rather than something eminently worthwhile in itself.
We have prepared a massive subverted fifth column in Primus, so we don't care to try to use our one chance to subvert the fleets, that only don't already have a fifth column because of that Chaos Cain crit success cutting our preparations short.This vote was about talking to the military. You didn't get an option to talk to the people because you already had a massive subverted fifth column in Primus which, if taken with the lack of diplomatic culture for the Federation, results in the assigned High Admiral not even bothering to do so.
The people you care about are already on your side, about to be, or will be given a chance to lay down arms.
The ones you don't give a rat's ass about are about to enter your weapon ranges.
By technicality of your pre-planned strategy, yes, but there is another vote with a decision you should make (splitting the battles to make them easier to write? Me? Not me, my good fellow, never!) that will impact some stuff down the line.
That's why I said "By technicality of your pre-planned strategy, yes" followed by "but there is another vote with a decision you should make" in there. This is you taking a side-step to resolve another matter before invading Secundus, not deciding if you aren't invading at all.You realize that the choice is between everyone on Voxx Primus starving or not, right? If we don't push onto Voxx Secondus we might as well just throw our hands up and lose.
Done the Battle Rolls and am currently writing, and I sure hope y'all have the reading comprehension to grock the report after Friendly Losses to see what you actually lost in Unrecoverable Losses. (That means you, Alectai.)