Clearly they do here, in this crossover setting.
Actually, yeah, now that I think about it, monthly series Attack on Titan was initially REJECTED by Shonen Jump here in the real world, only to find its home in another magazine (and I think we can all agree that Jump really shot themselves in the foot with that one)....
 
You complained and said you disliked the hugbox.
So surely you also wouldn't want anything like that to interfere with how we handle Kuyo, such as letting him live given how much of a threat he is.

...Nope, still don't see how those two are related.

The amount of whining over the slightest 'attack' on Mizore was quite frankly pathetic. So I voted against it. That will have no bearing on how I vote to deal with Kuyo.
 
...Nope, still don't see how those two are related.

The amount of whining over the slightest 'attack' on Mizore was quite frankly pathetic. So I voted against it. That will have no bearing on how I vote to deal with Kuyo.


I am the man who stands at the top of being totally confused about what you're talking about.

You aren't the only one. The view up here is lovely isn't it?
I believe the logic is "You went for the harsher option in Situation A, so now you must go for the harsher option in Situation B (or be exposed as a hypocrite)."

What I still don't understand is why Situation B had to be brought up in the first place, since I don't think taking down Kuyo as hard as possible is at all controversial.
 
As much as SV tends to White Knight, I don't think all that many of us are opposed to the notion of killing Kuyo. He fits quite nicely into the category of; "Irredeemable asshole who uses his inherent power to torture and kill as he pleases." It would pretty much be R+V's equivalent of letting the Joker go.
 
I don't really give a crap about morality, I just want my bitchin fur coat. But seriously though why are we even talking about Kuyo?
 
Back
Top