Mami Said Knock You Out, a Yuma Quest (PMMM)

[SVS]

@Lord Chungus




@Lord Chungus

I have located an infidel! The holy torches and luminous pitchforks are ready, at your signal!

SVS, if I were an heretic in your position, I would run right now.

Click to shrink...

Good sir, I am not a heretic. Being a heretic would imply that I am a follower of the faith who is speaking out against established doctrine. However, never once have I professed to believe in your faith, thus, even though I speak out against established doctrine I cannot be a heretic.
Had a previously been a member but since abandoned the faith, I would be an apostate.
But, having never been a member of the faith, I thus can neither speak out against my faith nor abandon it, making me an infidel.

Words have meaning, good sir, and the next time you threaten a man, your words will bear greater weight if you speak them correctly. I hope you have found this educational, and I hope the next time our paths cross in anger you shall be a wiser and more learned sir than you were previously.

 

[Onmur]

Good sir, I am not a heretic. Being a heretic would imply that I am a follower of the faith who is speaking out against established doctrine. However, never once have I professed to believe in your faith, thus, even though I speak out against established doctrine I cannot be a heretic.
Had a previously been a member but since abandoned the faith, I would be an apostate.
But, having never been a member of the faith, I thus can neither speak out against my faith nor abandon it, making me an infidel.

Words have meaning, good sir, and the next time you threaten a man, your words will bear greater weight if you speak them correctly. I hope you have found this educational, and I hope the next time our paths cross in anger you shall be a wiser and more learned sir than you were previously.

Click to shrink...

Ah, even if you are an infidel, your knowledge and control of the english language already proves you a worthy opponent against the glory of Nutella.

I can say it will be a pleasure to defeat you with all my angelic might and word of Milord. Since you are so knowledgeable, I will not be afraid to employ of manner of attacks against your infidel being, like the Nutella Punch, or the Overwhelming Headpat, or even the technique passed down from master to master since times ancient, the Yuma Tackle Hug.

And I expect you to put up a fight before you burn.

... I'll start hunting you down once Lord Chungus decides to take note of your infidel behavior.

*Stares menacingly while patiently waiting*

 

[tapkomet]

SVS, if I were an heretic in your position, I would run right now.

Click to shrink...

I wouldn't. It'd just mean dying tired

 

[Crawkid]

Ok, bit late with this, but congrats on page 50~

 

[tapkomet]

Good sir, I am not a heretic. Being a heretic would imply that I am a follower of the faith who is speaking out against established doctrine. However, never once have I professed to believe in your faith, thus, even though I speak out against established doctrine I cannot be a heretic.
Had a previously been a member but since abandoned the faith, I would be an apostate.
But, having never been a member of the faith, I thus can neither speak out against my faith nor abandon it, making me an infidel.

Click to shrink...

Actually, by most definitions I've found, you don't have to be a member of the faith, it's enough to hold contrary beliefs. Your other two definitions are on the dot, however, so you're both a heretic and an infidel, but obviously not an apostate.

 

[Onmur]

Perhaps 'pagan' or 'heathen' would work?

SVS, would you prefer to be a pagan, a heathen, an infidel, or perhaps reconsider and accept the Glory of Nutella?

Vote wise, though, I wonder how much subtly shipping can Yuma get away with? After all, she's just a child, so nobody would find it weird if she says weird things.

Maybe we should go back and vote for literally all the shipping options, as a challenge. To see if Sayaka's parents catch on.

 

[Nervos Belli]

Ok, bit late with this, but congrats on page 50~

Click to shrink...

You shitpost enough and anything's possible.

 

[Lord Chungus]

....



Filthy heathens, coming in and not worshipping Nutella! I mean really, what did the heretics ever do for us?

 

[SVS]

Actually, by most definitions I've found, you don't have to be a member of the faith, it's enough to hold contrary beliefs. Your other two definitions are on the dot, however, so you're both a heretic and an infidel, but obviously not an apostate.

Click to shrink...

Two of the three definitions of heretic that I found rely on the heretic having to be a member of the faith, though I haven't made a specific check of synonyms so it's possible I might find more definitions in-line with your own findings were I to look that direction.

Perhaps 'pagan' or 'heathen' would work?

SVS, would you prefer to be a pagan, a heathen, an infidel, or perhaps reconsider and accept the Glory of Nutella?

Click to shrink...

Actually, both pagan and heathen can technically work as applied, as both pagan and heathen have historically been used as insults against those not of an Abrahamic faith, though pagan also carries with it associations to historical polytheistic cultures, and heathen can also be applied to one who is non-religious, uncultured, or uncivilized.

But personally, I'd still prefer to be called an infidel, as both pagan and heathen have additional connotations that don't quite apply to me.

 

[Keldin]

....



Filthy heathens, coming in and not worshipping Nutella! I mean really, what did the heretics ever do for us?

Click to shrink...

Shitpost. Which, when you think about it is the greatest gift of all.

 

[tapkomet]

Two of the three definitions of heretic that I found rely on the heretic having to be a member of the faith, though I haven't made a specific check of synonyms so it's possible I might find more definitions in-line with your own findings were I to look that direction.



Actually, both pagan and heathen can technically work as applied, as both pagan and heathen have historically been used as insults against those not of an Abrahamic faith, though pagan also carries with it associations to historical polytheistic cultures, and heathen can also be applied to one who is non-religious, uncultured, or uncivilized.

But personally, I'd still prefer to be called an infidel, as both pagan and heathen have additional connotations that don't quite apply to me.

Click to shrink...

Perhaps you'd like to regale us in detail about your beliefs, so that we may insult you properly.

 

[SVS]

Perhaps you'd like to regale us in detail about your beliefs, so that we may insult you properly.

Click to shrink...

I'm a Madokamist, specifically of the duotheistic branch. That is, we place Akuma Homura on equal footing with Madokami and worship them as equals.

 

[Onmur]

Perhaps you'd like to regale us in detail about your beliefs, so that we may insult you properly.

Click to shrink...

Don't you think you're making things too complicated?

I'm a Madokamist, specifically of the duotheistic branch. That is, we place Akuma Homura on equal footing with Madokami and worship them as equals.

Click to shrink...

That is informative and the fack you worship Madokami says good things about your character, infidelism notwithstanding, but this does not inform us about the proper and best method to show discourtesy upon your person.

Supposing I wanted to verbally refer to you with hostile intent, how would you prefer to be called?

 

[SVS]

Don't you think you're making things too complicated?


That is informative and the fack you worship Madokami says good things about your character, infidelism notwithstanding, but this does not inform us about the proper and best method to show discourtesy upon your person.

Supposing I wanted to verbally refer to you with hostile intent, how would you prefer to be called?

Click to shrink...

I don't know that I've ever heard a specific slur meant to be directed towards Madokamists before. If you take particular offense to me putting Akuma Homura on equal footing with Madokami, perhaps calling me a devil-worshiper might scratch your itch? If not, I'll readily accept being called an infidel.

 

[tapkomet]

I don't know that I've ever heard a specific slur meant to be directed towards Madokamists before. If you take particular offense to me putting Akuma Homura on equal footing with Madokami, perhaps calling me a devil-worshiper might scratch your itch? If not, I'll readily accept being called an infidel.

Click to shrink...

Okay, so you're clearly a heretic (if the speaker is a true Madokamist), an infidel (if the speaker isn't a Madokamist), and a devil worshipper (regardless of who the speaker is). Got it.

EDIT: "heathen" is a bit arguable (is Madokamism considered a mainstream religion?) and "pagan" is possibly true if a dualistic faith can be considered polytheistic.

 

[Onmur]

....



Filthy heathens, coming in and not worshipping Nutella! I mean really, what did the heretics ever do for us?

Click to shrink...

I think every scientist and artist and philosopher before Nutella was introduced into the world counts as an a heretic, so many heretics have done great things for humanity. Of course, that's only because you allowed such a thing, but technically, heretics have done much for us.

I don't know that I've ever heard a specific slur meant to be directed towards Madokamists before. If you take particular offense to me putting Akuma Homura on equal footing with Madokami, perhaps calling me a devil-worshiper might scratch your itch? If not, I'll readily accept being called an infidel.

Click to shrink...

Well, I don't think I can blame you for thinking highly of Homura; she did nothing wrong, after all. We all enjoy a spot of devil worshipping now and then, I'm sure. And Madoka is a staunch ally of Nutella, because Madoka is ally to everything good, of course, and since Madoka cares so much for Homura, Nutella doesn't really have grounds to oppose the worshipping of Homura.

To simplify things, would you perhaps accept being called in anger: 'snollygoster', 'vending machine', 'ninnyhammer', 'unnecessary letter', 'tripod', 'mumpsimus', 'mayonnaise', 'hobbledehoy', 'you', 'mooncalf', 'cream-faced loon', 'abydocomist', 'bedswerver', 'dalcop', or 'fustilarian'?

I need to know, for in not having a proper word to utterly verbally offend you with, my feelings of utter and complete faithful rage only grow without release. I fear the wings granted to me by Milord might start shaking with fury unless you do me the favour of allowing a channel for my just ire.

Otherwise, if things continue as they are, not even the Yumahugs will be able to appease my total rage, you... darnation, I really need that proper insulting word to call you by, right now.

 

[SVS]

Well, I don't think I can blame you for thinking highly of Homura; she did nothing wrong, after all. We all enjoy a spot of devil worshipping now and then, I'm sure. And Madoka is a staunch ally of Nutella, because Madoka is ally to everything good, of course, and since Madoka cares so much for Homura, Nutella doesn't really have grounds to oppose the worshipping of Homura.

To simplify things, would you perhaps accept being called in anger: 'snollygoster', 'vending machine', 'ninnyhammer', 'unnecessary letter', 'tripod', 'mumpsimus', 'mayonnaise', 'hobbledehoy', 'you', 'mooncalf', 'cream-faced loon', 'abydocomist', 'bedswerver', 'dalcop', or 'fustilarian'?

I need to know, for in not having a proper word to utterly verbally offend you with, my feelings of utter and complete faithful rage only grow without release. I fear the wings granted to me by Milord might start shaking with fury unless you do me the favour of allowing a channel for my just ire.

Otherwise, if things continue as they are, not even the Yumahugs will be able to appease my total rage, you... darnation, I really need that proper insulting word to call you by, right now.

Click to shrink...

I'll have to think on this. You present me with a bounty of colourful options and I can't decide because I'm laughing so hard at all of them. Half of them are utter nonsense, and the rest are either baffling or random. "Unnecessary letter" sounds like something a coked-out wizard might call their child as a term of derogation.

 

[tapkomet]

I'll have to think on this. You present me with a bounty of colourful options and I can't decide because I'm laughing so hard at all of them. Half of them are utter nonsense, and the rest are either baffling or random. "Unnecessary letter" sounds like something a coked-out wizard might call their child as a term of derogation.

Click to shrink...

Surely your name could be greatly improved by removing the middle letter

Strangely enough, all of these are actual words

"Mumpsimus" is probably the most accurate, what with you clinging to the idea that Homura did nothing wrong

 

[Dark Lord Potato]

[x] At the dinner...
--[x] Subtly ship Kyoko and Sayaka. Hint at things, nothing else
--[X] Thank Sayaka's dad for supper.
---[X] And Sayaka herself, of course, and Sayaka's mom (for hospitality) if she's there
--[X] Eat all the food!
----[X] Just be careful when eating.

Vote still open?

 

[Rorb_Lalorb]

Wait a sec, Lord Chungus's profile picture is of Chiaki from Magical Girl Noir Quest. Chiaki is Homura but with amnesia. Homura becomes Akuma Homura. Could this mean that Lord Chungus is actually Akuma Homura with amnesia.

But that's just a theory, a quest theory. Thanks for reading.

 

[SVS]

Wait a sec, Lord Chungus's profile picture is of Chiaki from Magical Girl Noir Quest. Chiaki is Homura but with amnesia. Homura becomes Akuma Homura. Could this mean that Lord Chungus is actually Akuma Homura with amnesia.

But that's just a theory, a quest theory. Thanks for reading.

Click to shrink...

But, consider for a moment the picture of my own avatar. If we follow your own train of logic, than Chungus and I are the same person at different stages of Homura's life. We are both the same. We are both Homura. Therefore Homura, and thus, Akuma Homura, is the god of Nutella, and thus, Nutellism is actually an offshoot of duotheistic Madokamism.

 

[tapkomet]

But, consider for a moment the picture of my own avatar. If we follow your own train of logic, than Chungus and I are the same person at different stages of Homura's life. We are both the same. We are both Homura. Therefore Homura, and thus, Akuma Homura, is the god of Nutella, and thus, Nutellism is actually an offshoot of duotheistic Madokamism.

Click to shrink...

But by that logic, that also means you worship yourself (along with Madoka). So I guess "narcissist" and "egotist" are also appropriate descriptors

 

[SVS]

But by that logic, that also means you worship yourself (along with Madoka). So I guess "narcissist" and "egotist" are also appropriate descriptors

Click to shrink...

But I would no longer be an infidel, though as for heretic I cannot say. What do you call it when one half of a god speaks out against the domain of the other half, but both halves are of the same entity? I'm sure there is an example of such an occurrence in some pantheon, but for the life of me I can't think of what you would call that. Divine multiple personality disorder?

 

[tapkomet]

But I would no longer be an infidel, though as for heretic I cannot say. What do you call it when one half of a god speaks out against the domain of the other half, but both halves are of the same entity? I'm sure there is an example of such an occurrence in some pantheon, but for the life of me I can't think of what you would call that. Divine multiple personality disorder?

Click to shrink...

"Infidel" depends on the speaker though, if they aren't a Madokamist, then you're an infidel to them (and vice versa).

Hold up, since when are Madoka and Homura halves of the same entity? Okay now THAT is some serious heresy!

 

[SVS]

"Infidel" depends on the speaker though, if they aren't a Madokamist, then you're an infidel to them (and vice versa).

Hold up, since when are Madoka and Homura halves of the same entity? Okay now THAT is some serious heresy!

Click to shrink...

No, I was talking about Chungus and I being two halves of the same entity, going by the earlier train of thought proposed by Rorb which posited that Chungus was a stage in the life of Homura based on his user avatar.

So it breaks down like this- Chungus has Chiaki as his avatar. Chiaki is amnesiac Homura. Homura becomes Akuma Homura, therefore, Chungus is amnesiac Akuma Homura. But I too have Homura as my user avatar, which means that I too am Homura and all that comes with being Homura.

Now, if we've already established that Chungus is Akuma Homura, then following the above chain of logic, Akuma Homura is the god of Nutella. But, based on my user avatar, I am also Akuma Homura, and so if I speak out against Nutella, which we have already established is part of Akuma Homura's domain, then what does that make me? What does it make a deity that speaks out against something which another part of themselves rules over? I don't think deities can be considered heretics for speaking out against their own teachings, and even if you're a nonbeliever I'm not quite sure you can call a deity an infidel either.

Of course, this whole shebang falls apart the second you consider that Rorb's logic is wrong.