Isiri Pudireach
Predictive text can go duck itself
Remember, you get more friend points if you use the story "Friend Servants!"But how's Taylor supposed to get the Friend Points she needs without being in contact with Lisa and Rachel
Remember, you get more friend points if you use the story "Friend Servants!"But how's Taylor supposed to get the Friend Points she needs without being in contact with Lisa and Rachel
Ya know, I can't remember, but when was the first time Ritsuka astral projected? Was it before or after Monte Christo? Because if it was after, then Monte Christo might actually be why its happening in the first place. Only a handful of events predate it and the only big one I don't remember if it was a Rayshift or inside Chaldea was Christmas 1.
i am unsure if it counts, but even so far back as the french singularity we get dreams about things happening in other places, taylor got it in the story here too i am fairly sure, we didn't physically appear, but we did still observe and listen, might be an early version of it manifesting?Ya know, I can't remember, but when was the first time Ritsuka astral projected? Was it before or after Monte Christo? Because if it was after, then Monte Christo might actually be why its happening in the first place. Only a handful of events predate it and the only big one I don't remember if it was a Rayshift or inside Chaldea was Christmas 1.
I am concerned about the potential long term side effects from Marie losing those nightmares. I admittedly don't know the lore about dreamcatchers so I don't know if it contradicts what I'm about to suggest, but a throwaway line saying something like that the dream catcher doesn't necessarily remove the nightmare entirely, but rather transforms it into a less violent and painful dream could solve any concerns in this regard while still, thanks to the ambiguity of language, getting rid of her nightmares.Honest question here but… should they make her a dreamcatcher at all? don't get me wrong I know for patient comfort preventing traumatic dreams would be a blessing, and my knowledge of psychology is patchwork, but dreams play a roll in how our minds process information. Preventing that from happening might not be great for long term recovery.
I am literally just playing devils advocate I am well aware the director is getting a dream catcher.
To be fair, given proper therapy and recovery involves actively processing and confronting the traumatic event, I don't think keeping your nightmares would be any more help than the actual therapy. Remember - sleep is a crucial part of your mental wellbeing, and being unable to sleep is certainly adding water to an oil fire. Nightmares are just that, nightmares. You have no control on when they arrive, they can be very traumatic when they do, and when you get them, for a lot of people it becomes impossible to sleep again once they wake up.I am concerned about the potential long term side effects from Marie losing those nightmares. I admittedly don't know the lore about dreamcatchers so I don't know if it contradicts what I'm about to suggest, but a throwaway line saying something like that the dream catcher doesn't necessarily remove the nightmare entirely, but rather transforms it into a less violent and painful dream could solve any concerns in this regard while still, thanks to the ambiguity of language, getting rid of her nightmares.
My knowledge of psychology is hardly professional, so I can't say whether therapy can make up, so to speak, the experience of dreaming when it comes to processing your experiences. My comment when I was writing was based on the assumption that dreams provided a distinct, albeit similar, psychological service. Even if therapy can substitute perfectly well, Romani explicitly says that he does not have the time to give her the proper care, which still makes the dreaming process valuable in this case. Would Marie be better off psychologically even if the dream catcher just blanked her nightmares instead of soothing them? Yes. The anxiety and sleep deprivation that you pointed out she would almost undoubtedly experience otherwise would be more harmful. Still, the service that dreams provide in processing experiences is important, especially since Marie can't get proper therapy. Thus, it feels fair to be concerned about how the dream catcher goes about removing nightmares. I did not mean to imply that she'd be better off with the nightmares, although I can see how my comment can be interpreted that way. I hope this response sufficiently clears things up.To be fair, given proper therapy and recovery involves actively processing and confronting the traumatic event, I don't think keeping your nightmares would be any more help than the actual therapy. Remember - sleep is a crucial part of your mental wellbeing, and being unable to sleep is certainly adding water to an oil fire. Nightmares are just that, nightmares. You have no control on when they arrive, they can be very traumatic when they do, and when you get them, for a lot of people it becomes impossible to sleep again once they wake up.
Heck, given that Marie is neurotic enough to have existing anxiety problems, nightmares giving her a reason to be anxious about going to bed instead of sleep being a rest is certainly enough of a factor in trying to get rid of the nightmares entirely.
So, decided to check Wikipedia, and according to that, Dreamcatchers aren't even explicitly related to dreams. They are general "protection from harm" type charms.Thus, it feels fair to be concerned about how the dream catcher goes about removing nightmares.
Well I do have some background in psychology since I'm currently graduating from it. And though the psychodynamic approach does argue that dreams are important in memory consolidation and emotional regulation, it is also in a sense of remembering your dreams and interpreting them. The fact is, most of the time people can't even recall their dreams, even nightmares unless they're the recurring type, so there's very little evidence towards the psychodynamic approach unfortunately. It doesn't help that memory, especially dream memory, can be extremely fallible and prone to bias. Arguably, even the dream interpretation part of the therapy process can be considered as an offshoot of cognitive therapy as opposed to merely psychodynamic in nature.My knowledge of psychology is hardly professional, so I can't say whether therapy can make up, so to speak, the experience of dreaming when it comes to processing your experiences. My comment when I was writing was based on the assumption that dreams provided a distinct, albeit similar, psychological service. Even if therapy can substitute perfectly well, Romani explicitly says that he does not have the time to give her the proper care, which still makes the dreaming process valuable in this case. Would Marie be better off psychologically even if the dream catcher just blanked her nightmares instead of soothing them? Yes. The anxiety and sleep deprivation that you pointed out she would almost undoubtedly experience otherwise would be more harmful. Still, the service that dreams provide in processing experiences is important, especially since Marie can't get proper therapy. Thus, it feels fair to be concerned about how the dream catcher goes about removing nightmares. I did not mean to imply that she'd be better off with the nightmares, although I can see how my comment can be interpreted that way. I hope this response sufficiently clears things up.
Somehow, her karma is shit. Either she was really horrible in her past life, or her father's sin got unjustly dumped in her head.
Jokingly, it might just worked. Male Ritsuka is pretty amazing canon wise. He managed to woe Goddesses. Olga Marie shouldn't be an issue. He just needed time."I don't think a kiss is going to fix this sleeping beauty, Onii-chan."
I wonder if we get new Mystic Code with a hat, to cover, presumably, buzz-cut.Also it let's Taylor do something even if it somehow makes her magic weaker.
Eeeeeehhhh.Fair enough. Still doesn't mean my second point about Da Vinci and Aife being able to heal the "damage" afterwards is incorrect though. And this is assuming that Da Vinci even goes along with this harebrained scheme, which isn't necesarily true. Taylor might've been seeing the silk comment as an out, and it probably was one at least partially. But Da Vinci was probably absolutely correct that it would work better if it was done with actual spider silk. And it'd probably work better if Da Vinci made it. Taylor cutting her hair to make it is a noble sacrifice and all, but it's not likely to outdo something made by Da Vinci.
2) Dreams. You know who also uses dreams? The entities. Woops! Marie now finds herself sitting on QA in it's dream space. QA is very interested.
Romani shook his head. "I can't even say that the worst of it is over. The Director is in for a long, hard struggle, and frankly, even once she's well enough to resume her own duties, there's still just too much going on for me to dedicate the time and care she needs to make a full recovery. Mentally speaking, I mean."
The thing is FGO's Kiara IS a Good Girl and a therapist that really tries to help. She only got screwed over by a Demon Pillar and getting exposed to a horrible version of herself. Sadly she is currently incinerated like the rest of Humanity.We need Kiara here now. Unrepentant Beast or not, she at least takes her job as therapist seriously*. If she were summoned, she'd do her level best to help poor Olga, even if the rest of the time she needed Andersen keeping an eye on her.
From recent Santa event, after reveal, i wonder what Taylor (or theoretical Foreigner Taylor) would think of Vritra.
If you didn't say anything, i'd thought it was an actual photo. "Too realistic" indeed.Did this one a while ago on Artbreeder, but never revealed it because my editors said it was "too realistic." I like it anyway, and thought I'd share it now.
If you had not explicitly told us you made that, I would think it was just an actual picture. The future of analog horror according to Game Theory is looking more and more likely by the second...Did this one a while ago on Artbreeder, but never revealed it because my editors said it was "too realistic." I like it anyway, and thought I'd share it now.