...okay, I'm not sure if this is a deliberate AU feature or if it's supposed to give me the screaming meemies. Attorney-client privilege covers all communications regarding legal advice between anyone and their lawyer, always, regardless of circumstances, unless said privilege was explicitly and voluntarily waived (or the communication was made publicly/in front of somebody else, or was made for the purpose of committing a crime [like, an additional one; trying to get off when you actually did it isn't a crime and is covered]). It is absolutely horrifying- I literally don't have the words- to consider that the state might have the ability to "nah, fuck you" attorney-client privilege.people merely under suspicion of having committed a crime are not covered by attorney client privilege
Yeah; that was so crazy that I spent some time looking into it, and I can't find any evidence of such an exemption to attorney client privilege existing....okay, I'm not sure if this is a deliberate AU feature or if it's supposed to give me the screaming meemies. Attorney-client privilege covers all communications regarding legal advice between anyone and their lawyer, always, regardless of circumstances, unless said privilege was explicitly and voluntarily waived (or the communication was made publicly/in front of somebody else, or was made for the purpose of committing a crime [like, an additional one; trying to get off when you actually did it isn't a crime and is covered]). It is absolutely horrifying- I literally don't have the words- to consider that the state might have the ability to "nah, fuck you" attorney-client privilege.
Edit: Perhaps the clearest way I can emphasize this to convey the depth of my horror is to state that "attorney-client privilege" just as foundational a legal principle and more important than "innocent until proven guilty", and ask you to think real hard about your reaction to a violation of the latter.
...okay, I'm not sure if this is a deliberate AU feature or if it's supposed to give me the screaming meemies. Attorney-client privilege covers all communications regarding legal advice between anyone and their lawyer, always, regardless of circumstances, unless said privilege was explicitly and voluntarily waived (or the communication was made publicly/in front of somebody else, or was made for the purpose of committing a crime [like, an additional one; trying to get off when you actually did it isn't a crime and is covered]). It is absolutely horrifying- I literally don't have the words- to consider that the state might have the ability to "nah, fuck you" attorney-client privilege.
Edit: Perhaps the clearest way I can emphasize this to convey the depth of my horror is to state that "attorney-client privilege" just as foundational a legal principle and more important than "innocent until proven guilty", and ask you to think real hard about your reaction to a violation of the latter.
Yeah; that was so crazy that I spent some time looking into it, and I can't find any evidence of such an exemption to attorney client privilege existing.
Various law firms all have pages on attorney client privilege, this one covers it all pretty well.
It's doesn't explicitly say that they can't just refuse to allow a prisoner to see a lawyer in a context where they can expect private contact with a lawyer, but refusing that while keeping someone in jail effectively directly restricts your right to an attorney.
Unless I've missed something they legitimately can't do this, and trying it in front of a defense attorney is asking to spend the next decade with the justice department's boot stuck so far up your ass you can taste the sole.
Sounds like the cover art for a Power Metal album from the new band Screaming Nuclear Hatefire.Molly in boob-armor cuirass with a special slot for a skull. Bob doesn't has a soul, but if he had one he would have sold it for this.
Even then it's playing with fire. As soon as anyone with a law degree figured out what you're doing they're running for the hills, and possibly reporting you.Shady government agencies that are already ignoring some legal procedures also sneaking around attorney-client privilege, I can buy
Also, I've got to say, Forthill seems like a pretty shit lawyer so far. I mean telling your client to take a deal despite being able to demonstrate they're innocent is pretty bad, but not even trying to get them to run it past you before signing is just lazy.
This whole thing is especially bad since if he knows Harry is on a time crunch and thinks the authorities are violating privilege announcing it that way lets the FBI know they still have more leverage than just getting Dresden his weekend back if they weren't already aware.
The FBI could walk in just after he leaves and give him a bullshit deal based on this conversation, and spend the rest of his stay trying to pressure him into it by guessing and checking what tactics make him upset.
What is he, a contract lawyer who failed to mention he has no idea how to help when we asked him to represent Harry?
I reckon Lash doesn't want to be near ground zero for this either...He lowers his voice so low you can hardly hear it. "Cindy Matthews has been kidnapped. Do you know anything that can help."
"God damn it!" I can feel my cheeks going red at saying that in front of a priest. I shake my head no as Lash looks over at you over his shoulder. I half expect some sharp quip, but she is quiet, thinking. Is it too late to go back to the quips?
Fair enough. In the original version it came off sort of tone deaf on Forthill's part since he knew stuff he wasn't sharing that changed the situation for Dresden but also said something that could be read as implying an urgent situation where the FBI might be listening.He is not telling him to take the deal and he does not know if Harry is in a time crunch so he said 'if you are in a time crunch take the lesser deal'. The reason he is doing that is because he know that the kind of things that put Harry in a time crunch can be really bad, like Darkhallow bad. To counter that he made it clear that if there is no screaming emergency he's going to get him out Monday.
For someone so insulated from direct consequences from their victims being around an upset mortal with at least one power that can screw you over with no contest must be very unsettling. I can't wait till we get that exorcism going and can run around ruining the Denarians days.I reckon Lash doesn't want to be near ground zero for this either...
The NeverNever has paths that reach the moon.Fair enough. In the original version it came off sort of tone deaf on Forthill's part since he knew stuff he wasn't sharing that changed the situation for Dresden but also said something that could be read as implying an urgent situation where the FBI might be listening.
Could have just been me reading too much into it.
For someone so insulated from direct consequences from their victims being around an upset mortal with at least one power that can screw you over with no contest must be very unsettling. I can't wait till we get that exorcism going and can run around ruining the Denarians days.
Even past taking them from their hosts, we should make the time to do unpleasant things to the coins. Sure they'll get around it eventually, but it'll be really annoying until they do.
Stuff like going to the really weird bits of the nevernever and leaving them in pocket worlds, or pawning them to Hades to add to his biblical collection.
We almost certainly couldn't make the time for it, but I'm also tempted by the idea of hacking together travel and environmental protection stuff to have a go at flying to the moon to bury some of them there. Sure they'd get our eventually, but it'd be a real pain in the ass.
Unfortunately, even at the most convenient read of our potential travel abilities and the distances involved it'd still be a 60 day trip one way.
Sudden shift from first to second person here, keeps in second till the last sentence which shifts back to first.She was wearing a orange jumper now that clashed badly with her hair and even more so with her bearing. You do try to keep from smiling, though you do not quite manage it.
Isn't that Hell also going to be our soul? If so, I would rather not keep the coins there.Once we have a personal Hell, it might be risky in some ways, but storing them inside there would possibly be the most secure place we could find
Thats a hard No boss.Once we have a personal Hell, it might be risky in some ways, but storing them inside there would possibly be the most secure place we could find
Literally just adepta sororitas armour.Molly in boob-armor cuirass with a special slot for a skull. Bob doesn't have a soul, but if he had one he would have sold it for this.
That does not work because the other fallen can just retrieve the coin. They have ways to track each other.Else the logical thing would be to stick each coin in a block of warded metal and concrete, fly an hour or so off the US west coast and drop it into the abyssal depths of the Pacific. Bonus points if you drop it into one of the deep sea trenches.
You cant tell me the Catholic Church hasnt tried deep sixing at least one coin before only to have it turn up again.
Thats a hard No boss.
We will have humans there. Loyal or not, bringing in a coin is just begging for a Boromir/One Ring scenario.
And as a general rule, storing magical waste in something connected to your soul seems like a bad idea.
They can escape. That is the point of those charms. The inner world is a mini Yomi Wan and it must always have an escape clause. Same with Infernal inner world.And more than one charm consigns defeated enemies to the Infernal's inner hell without a concern that they'd breakout or damage the place. The Coins aren't magical waste, they're magical prisoners, and that's the purpose of the Hells, prisons.
They can escape. That is the point of those charms. The inner world is a mini Yomi Wan and it must always have an escape clause. Same with Infernal inner world.