1)Repeated citations state otherwise.Field commanders and agents, as in telling people what to do and doing things the fey aren't allowed to. That doesn't make them magical powerhouses or require they know a lot about what's going on outside their orders.
Especially since how each knight goes about their role is different. Slate and Harry being a pretty obvious example of people recruited for different skill sets.
Also note your own quote suggesting that knights are disposable to them and easily replaced. That doesn't exactly imply they're super powerful on an individual level.
The power imbalance on a practical level seems to come down to one court not being able to act very effectively in the mortal world and whatever power is bound up in making the mantle in the first place.
Take our splendors for example, an entire red elder with all the abilities that implies even for a shit one, could go into fueling possession immunity.
That is an amazing ability, as long as possession is a major problem in your threat space. If you're fighting against a dozen mortals you'd probably prefer to have the vamp on staff though.
So it seems with the knights, the fey have to put down a chunk of power to meaningfully exploit mortal related loopholes. This is also why a wizard champion was so great; he could make use of the mantle from his side in ways the fey couldn't just make available from theirs, making him a more efficient servant.
Knights like Slate should be weaker in every parameter than Harry was. Including, incidentally, how difficult they are to manipulate.
When Fix, a changeling of no magical talent, suddenly has enough mojo to attempt beamspam against Dresden, who is canonically one of the 40 or 50 brawniest wizards in the setting? The well of power in the Mantle runs deep.
2)We dont know what Slate was recruited for, actually. Just what Dresden was recruited for.
3)No, you are misinterpreting that.
What it says is that Knights come and go like paper cups. Thats their lifespan. Because they are mortal, and have to be as a requirement of the job among the immortal Sidhe. Its not the same thing as saying they are disposable.
4)I dont buy that argument.
The statements we see from both Bob and Aurora imply its more than that. The Courts have no issue appointing mortal Emissaries to act for them, and they dont need any particular oomph to do so.
5) And yet, Dresden is the first wizard either Court has recruited as Knight that we know of since Mab and her sister came to power in their respective Courts. Elaine Mallory took refuge with Summer and was never tapped for the job.
And she is just the most recent we know of.
The fact that neither Court appears to prioritize recruiting mortal wizards, or sorcerers, or even mortal talents, appears to suggest that this particular hypothesis does not hold water in the setting.
6) We see Mab talking about what she's looking for at her first meeting with Harry.
Magical ability isnt one of them. When she mentioned possible replacements for Harry if he died, she mentioned his brother the Whampire, with very little magical ability.
That is not true.Except they did exactly that, and had no plan to do anything about Slate at his most useless until he betrayed Mab.
The global repercussions seem to be more about the balance shifting due to capacity loss than immediate power concerns.
There is literally nothing anywhere that I can find that says that Slate was useless. Or bad at his job.
The only information we have is that he was pissed at Maeve.
He wasnt Dresden, but he was a perfectly serviceable Knight until he went rogue.
Kinda is.The war has already started, I don't think this sort of risk is really a deterrent anymore.
My point wasn't that Madrigal was working a bounty, my point was that I don't think the human eating slavers who've demonstrated a willingness to buy people up to and including wizards would have a problem with using bounty hunters.
Hell, for quest purposes that's what Broken Seeker was.
Because the Red Court committed to staying out of Chicago after Dresden defeated Paolo Ortega in a public duel.
It was registered with the Accords. Publicly
Its hard to get people to do work for you if you have a reputation for faithlessness with your previous agreements.
They get nervous about getting paid, or being betrayed.
Thats why when the Reds broke the agreement, they sent their own hitters.
They dont have to stack up with those to vastly expand the ability of someone with one to wreak damage.Splendors are deep, but not wide. They don't stack up with the swords or the stone table outside of very narrow areas.
Nasty things could maybe be done with them, but we're not exactly going to be introducing new models of that tier of artifact on a whim.
If a Neverborn or Yama King manages to, say, turn 3x 2-dot Splendors into a 5-dot?
Or to upgrade a 3-dot?
Something like Nicky's plot to start an epidemic in Chicago suddenly becomes a lot more plausible.