Chloe Sullivan
Subdefective
- Location
- 1630 Revello Drive, Sunnydale CA
Depends on what level of PC you're talking about. Low level, 3.5 was way easier to GM, because NPCs didn't have as many powers, there were fewer things overall to keep track of, and things were shorter, making it easier to fudge things. High level you're probably right, but high level D&D was so completely broken in 3.5 I'm not sure how to evaluate the ease or difficulty of GMing.
This is hilariously hilariously untrue, but we can argue that in the D&D thread if you want to keep claiming that.
Could you further expand on this? There seem to be implications under the surface of these paragraphs, but I'm not sure which of the directions of interpreting them is the most appropriate/intended.
Hmm. As a client of WW/OPP (non-backer, but one who did buy 3e mostly for inspiration and comparison), I actually sympathise with Holden on that one, even though I agree that he seems to be a suboptimal person to pick for public speaking. He said that consent was implied by the wording/context, and it was good enough. But then people went on to search for precedents in various books regarding use of the word 'lover' to mean 'victim'. If he were to agree with such arguments, I would see this as a sign of weakness. Listening to reasonable criticism is good; pandering to people who pick the worst possible reading of a text and demand changing it isn't.
Words have meanings, both denotatipn and connotation. When someone points out that your words have unpleasant connotations, the non-asshole response is to say "whoops, didn't mean that, let me fix it."
Now granted, if you're in a forum debate, and someone is willfully misinterpreting your words, that trolling and you should call the mods. However, that's not at all the same as people politely pointing out that the wording on a text in a book for mass market publication is iffy and can be read in an unfortunate way. in such a case, the writer is pretty much professionally obligated to fix that, because with that large an audience, misinterpretation is virtually guarantees, and not taking easy, basic steps to avoid offending or triggering people unnecesarily is crappy behavior.
So basically, Holden cannot into acting like the professional he supposedly is now, rather than a forumite in an intermet slapfight.
And that is very much something that can and ahould be criticized. Exalted fams want and (600k USD's worth of) deserve professional work on 3e.
So, as I've mentioned a time or two previously in the thread, I've been working on some War charms for Ex3. I've got enough done to count as a proper first draft, so I'd like to post 'em up here for some feedback
Thanks, These seem really useful.
The only issue i have is that as written 3e is silent on the question of using defend other on a battlegroup, and your charm for that, while cool, is likely to make a GM say I cannot DO a BG without it, which would have made the spec ops group commander solar on of my players made, and I hope to run an expy of someday myself, rather sad.