Chloe Sullivan
Subdefective
- Location
- 1630 Revello Drive, Sunnydale CA
I recall a line about it being well known that the empress favored "a woman's touch" but she also took many male lovers to found houses.
Aren't the Realm against employing Demons in this manner, at least when an official Heir would be the intended result?and its not like a player couldn't easily get access to a Neomah or something to have children with their arranged spouse without ever having sex with them if they wanted.
The Realm is generally officially against demons, yes.Aren't the Realm against employing Demons in this manner, at least when an official Heir would be the intended result?
Even that's misleading because Immaculate Monks have been there since the start.I'm having a hard time parsing that statement.
What I was told was that "The realm was against Dragonborn not breeding, they were totally fine with you being as gay as you like on your own time."
The Realm is generally officially against demons, yes.
That's why you keep quiet about it
Article: Same-sex couples face stigma over matters of reproduction, but little else. If a same-sex marriage does produce a child — whether through adopting a patrician outcaste (p. XX) or an undesirable or orphaned child of a Dynastic relative, employing a surrogate parent, or turning to sorcery — then their duty to house and Realm is fulfilled, and they become as socially acceptable as any other couple, the circumstance of their genders no more than a trifling quirk.
I haven't encountered anything about immaculates being anti-gay, though i admittedly have not read every splatbook.Even that's misleading because Immaculate Monks have been there since the start.
...No, the vow of celibacy thing.I haven't encountered anything about immaculates being anti-gay, though i admittedly have not read every splatbook.
There's also always the option of going the Ledaal Kas route and marrying your equally gay best friend of the opposite gender.The Realm was against gay marriage in 2e, in the sense that it assumed you would be reproducing in the 'normal' way without any magic to allow for same sex couples to have children, and you were getting married in order to have children (and as political alliances and stuff, but children is the most important bit). It was sort of equal opportunity in not giving a shit if you were personally in favor of your marriage on any level, and indeed affairs are noted to be common and even encouraged as long as you have children with the person you were told to and no one else.
This can be seen as anti-LGBT in the sense that you're *forcing* them to go against their sexual preference, but I am personally fine with that being one of the evils of the Realm, and its not like a player couldn't easily get access to a Neomah or something to have children with their arranged spouse without ever having sex with them if they wanted.
Do I have a problem with same-sex marriages being a thing in the Realm now? No, if Exalted wants to do that its fine, its not like it isn't super easy to justify with all sorts of magic in the setting even from the perspective of the Realm wanting all marriages to produce children, and if it makes the game's audience happy its probably a good idea. Exalted has always had much higher gay representation than most other RPGs I've seen.
The Realm contains a list of some sorcerous societies in the Realm, and one of them is the "Cabal of Righteous Midwives", who specialise on exactly that. Their entry does mention that summoning Neomah for that is a disreputable practise, but the Midwives "consult Immaculate monks for scriptural guidance". So it is the kind of thing that's somewhat looked down upon, but there's still institutions in place for it.Aren't the Realm against employing Demons in this manner, at least when an official Heir would be the intended result?
Oh man I've seen some bad fucking takes in the Exalted community over the new books, mostly just entirely over the LGBT stuff in them. So bizarre, you figure people who have a problem with that shit wouldn't stick around in a game line that's had a fair amount of LGBT rep, but 2e did bring in some real fucking weirdos so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised to see people melt down over 3e's Realm allowing gay marriage (in the same circumstances as a love marriage, so rarely) and it being ok with trans people.
And I wouldn't blame 2e for that, 3e is totally capable of attracting its own problem people.
It's the usual crowd on 4chan and other places that have fucking meltdowns over lgbt stuff. Feels funny to live rent free in their heads like that.Now I'm curious. Can you link us?
And I wouldn't blame 2e for that, 3e is totally capable of attracting its own problem people.
It's more that monkhood provides a Dragon-Blooded with an escape from those pressures. They don't even have to take it, just looking towards that door is going to give them bargaining power.I haven't encountered anything about immaculates being anti-gay, though i admittedly have not read every splatbook.
That's also my understanding - if you want to be gay, that's fine, as long as you still fulfill your marital duties and provide your House with newborn Dynasts to continue the family into the next generation.I'm having a hard time parsing that statement.
What I was told was that "The realm was against Dragonborn not breeding, they were totally fine with you being as gay as you like on your own time."
The main issue is that I remember Earthscorpion once ran the numbers, and using neomah is a pretty bad decision once you get to an institutional scale of operation. Quoting from memory here, but I think it was something like a one-in-five to one-in-four chance that any given child produced with a neomah's help develops significant issues - which can range from sprouting red hair all over the body to legs never developing bones and thus becoming useless tubes of meat to epilepsy to schizophrenia to psychopathy.So it is the kind of thing that's somewhat looked down upon, but there's still institutions in place for it.
Aren't the Realm against employing Demons in this manner, at least when an official Heir would be the intended result?
Well they got slavery around. So you can feel reaaaaalll good about burning Cynis to the ground.I'm actually a little disappointed that the Realm is cool with gay marriage.
Like, in real life I'm all for it, but it always bugs me when a fantasy universe has values that match a little too close to real life, gimme some socially backwards norms that my character can fight against, dangit!
Eeehhhh... I feel like slavery has been played out, like to the point that its almost genetic.Well they got slavery around. So you can feel reaaaaalll good about burning Cynis to the ground.
Honestly I've dealt with that in so many fucking games already. I just enjoy playing a game where I just don't have to deal with that shit.Eeehhhh... I feel like slavery has been played out, like to the point that its almost genetic.
Give me oppression of minorities and women, discrimination of people based on their orientation or gender identity, or something. Especially in a game like Exalted where "societal reformation" is totally a thing you can expect your character to be capable of.
Well they got slavery around. So you can feel reaaaaalll good about burning Cynis to the ground.
Thats fair. In other games I kinda ignore it in other games because its apart of the background setting and not something you're expected to be able to have an impact on.Honestly I've dealt with that in so many fucking games already. I just enjoy playing a game where I just don't have to deal with that shit.