He ended up throwing encounters at us that'd of been level appropriate if we had unlimited leveling. And he didn't let us have Attack Ranks beyond our level limits because "it's a variant rule."
Dick move. Very dick move.
He ended up throwing encounters at us that'd of been level appropriate if we had unlimited leveling. And he didn't let us have Attack Ranks beyond our level limits because "it's a variant rule."
I'm considering doing a 3.5 game during the summer, and backporting PF is something i'm willing to consider if people have an interesting mechanics concept.I am reading through Pathfinder sorcerer stuff and the nanite bloodline seems tailor-made to use Eldritch Heritage feats to gain a second bloodline (heritage feats as available bloodline bonus feats!). Now I'm really wanting to play a sorcerer character who was part of some bizarre experiment by their parents... something like a tiefling who's parents were disappointed they showed no magical aptitude so injected them with nanites and (X).
Please someone tell me they have an idea for a pathfinder game ^^
I'm considering doing a 3.5 game during the summer, and backporting PF is something i'm willing to consider if people have an interesting mechanics concept.
I was basically envisioning a sort of "explore this massive tower that was fabled to be a mighty academy of magical knowledge before it went wrong and time-space imploded. Now it's back-ish and you're going to go wander in and loot stuff."
I realized, just today, that my setting is basically Darkest Dungeon except lighter and going up.
I would be interested as well, if you do run it.I'm considering doing a 3.5 game during the summer, and backporting PF is something i'm willing to consider if people have an interesting mechanics concept.
I was basically envisioning a sort of "explore this massive tower that was fabled to be a mighty academy of magical knowledge before it went wrong and time-space imploded. Now it's back-ish and you're going to go wander in and loot stuff."
I realized, just today, that my setting is basically Darkest Dungeon except lighter and going up.
Keep in mind i mostly use 3.5 rules, which means XP is currency, and awards are calculated based on CR, rather than been inviolate and fixed like it is in PF.I've kinda realized that as long as I'm in PF games, I'm pretty much never going to stop coming up with character ideas, so I'd be interested either with that character or some other.
So 5E Bards are broken....
The Jack of all trades ability allows you to add 1/2 your proficiency bonus to all skill and ability checks you are not proficient in
Initiative is a ability check
Concentration is a ability check
Counterspell and dispel magic use ability checks
That's not how it works. You don't add your proficiency bonus to those normally.
Starting at 2nd level, you can add half your proficiency bonus, rounded down, to any ability check you make that doesn't already include your proficiency bonus.
At the beginning of every combat, you roll initiative by making a Dexterity check.
Players Handbook p. 177
....If it is casting a spell of 4th level or higher, make an ability check using your spellcasting ability. The DC equals 10 + the spell's level....
....For each spell of 4th level or higher on the target, make an ability check using your spellcasting ability. The DC equals 10 + the spell's level. On a successful check, the spell ends.....
I think the PF Sorcerer is one of the flat-out improvements over 3.5 that should basically always be backported. The Sorcerer in 3.5 is an awful, awful base class, whereas the PF one has actual class features and stuff.I'm considering doing a 3.5 game during the summer, and backporting PF is something i'm willing to consider if people have an interesting mechanics concept.
I was basically envisioning a sort of "explore this massive tower that was fabled to be a mighty academy of magical knowledge before it went wrong and time-space imploded. Now it's back-ish and you're going to go wander in and loot stuff."
I realized, just today, that my setting is basically Darkest Dungeon except lighter and going up.
Doesn't matter
Exact wording of Jack of all Trades
Initiative is a dexterity check therefore it applies
As is Counter spell
And Dispel Magic
Sadly it appears that concentration is constitution based save not a check.
Yea, uh. Sage Advice already addressed this. It's only supposed to apply to things you can possess proficiency in.
Ugh, and now I remembered that I usually run Spellcasting-No games. (If you have cool bloodlines that do noncasting stuff, then Sorc is still quite playable because you get Supernatural Exchange for free, but you'll be mid tier 3 instead of high tier 2.)I think the PF Sorcerer is one of the flat-out improvements over 3.5 that should basically always be backported. The Sorcerer in 3.5 is an awful, awful base class, whereas the PF one has actual class features and stuff.
Also saying that I'd be interested in that.
Not true. Bards were broken in Baldur's Gate, since they cast as a wizard of one level lower, but used the Thief XP-advancement table, which meant they basically cast as well as a wizard, due to Thief table being more generous, and making them higher level at the same XP. /pedantThe only broken Bard is 1e. So what if 5e Bards go first? That just means they get to suck before anyone else.
I think spontaneous casters are easier to slot into a game with Totemists and Dragonfire Adepts and such, because it's all in the spell selection. I've also played in tiered gestalt games tuned so that you couldn't play a straight tier 1, and found that to work pretty well also.Ugh, and now I remembered that I usually run Spellcasting-No games. (If you have cool bloodlines that do noncasting stuff, then Sorc is still quite playable because you get Supernatural Exchange for free, but you'll be mid tier 3 instead of high tier 2.)
I'm going to have to think about that. I don't like to restrict people from what they want, but Tier 1/2 casters are hard to keep in line with other classes, and I like AMSes. I like Totemists and Dragonfire Adepts and Worldthought Medics.
Yeah, the 3.5 base sorcerers lack of class features is dumb, but there are a lot of ways of fixing that, even without using PF.
The only broken Bard is 1e. So what if 5e Bards go first? That just means they get to suck before anyone else.
My inclination is to be all like "oh, you want to be an X? How about you try Y instead" where Y is a class using some mechanic other than spellcasting. I really want to promote the use of alternate magic systems. They're generally more fun, less overpowering, and less fiddly the Vancian magic.I think spontaneous casters are easier to slot into a game with Totemists and Dragonfire Adepts and such, because it's all in the spell selection. I've also played in tiered gestalt games tuned so that you couldn't play a straight tier 1, and found that to work pretty well also.