Rajvik_wolfboy
Wolf amongst the stars.
- Location
- Florida
Builder's choice I think. Haven't started on it yet because I want to use it to build the pieces for a 1/350 scale
They also found the other three DDs lost at the Battle of Ormoc Bay: Naganami, Hamanami, & Wakatsuki.Don't forget the wrecks they found last year, including Indy, the Nishimura force, Cooper, and Ward, as well as Shimakaze. I might be forgetting a few off the top of my head.
Yes, those would all be within range of their equipment. The ships of Samar...not so much.Perhaps, although the losses at Samar are in extremely deep water, and there is also a lot of volume to search for Midway, Coral Sea, and Santa Cruz for three.
Is that New York after Crossroads?
it must be.. it is definitely a New York class and there were only 2 of them so seeing as the second is a museum ship.... its a nice find though.. i have spent years looking for shots of this quality of ANY of the target vessels..
thanks for the info.. just one small thing.. i am 90 percent certain that Arkansas and New York were not standardsNew York was part of a sinkex after the bikini tests.
The standards present at Bikini were...the USS Pennsylvania (BB-38), USS New York (BB-34), USS Arkansas (BB-33), USS Nevada (BB-36). Nagato obvs was there as well as Sara, Prinz, Independence (CVL), a host of DDs, DEs and SS.
If the fleet anchored at Bikini had been an actual fleet, it would have been the 6th largest fleet in the world at the time. It also included ammunition and ordinance.
Nuclear testing at Bikini Atoll - Wikipedia
thanks for the info.. just one small thing.. i am 90 percent certain that Arkansas and New York were not standards
I call em standards because they were part of the big slow battle line the US would have fielded.thanks for the info.. just one small thing.. i am 90 percent certain that Arkansas and New York were not standards
I thought I was forgetting a few destroyers.They also found the other three DDs lost at the Battle of Ormoc Bay: Naganami, Hamanami, & Wakatsuki.
One day... maybe...Yes, those would all be within range of their equipment. The ships of Samar...not so much.
For a WW1-era battleship with a less-than-adequate armor scheme, Yorkie was remarkably resilient. Taking that kind of punishment is no small feat.New York was hit by forty-one 500 and 100 lb bombs and fifty-six 5in High Velocity air to surface rockets. Rolled over and sank before the surface ships could engage.
This was about two years after the Bikini Atoll tests.
point taken. you know i often wonder if part of the reason the US navy set the speed of the standards at 21 knot was because that was what ships like the New York class were capable of...I call em standards because they were part of the big slow battle line the US would have fielded.
21 knots and about a fuck ton of armor. Looks like a standard, waddles like a standard, shoots like a standard...
In the 10s and 20s the USN was a follower of the Mahanian Doctrine. The Decisive Battle. Kantai Kessen.point taken. you know i often wonder if part of the reason the US navy set the speed of the standards at 21 knot was because that was what ships like the New York class were capable of...
Yeah i know about mahanian doctrine and so on i was more referring to the fact that it seems to me that the US navy could have chosen to make all of the standards capable of moving at for instance 23 knots. that they didn't suggests to me at least that they deliberately chose to limit the standards to 21 knots so that the older vessels could operate with them and i just answered my own question didn't I?In the 10s and 20s the USN was a follower of the Mahanian Doctrine. The Decisive Battle. Kantai Kessen.
You have your big ass fleet, the enemy has their big ass fleet. You throw them at each other and see who's got the better ships, better crews or worse luck (See Battle of Jutland and Dogger Bank during WW1). That's what Mahanian Doctrine looks like.
The Standards were built the way they were so that all of our big gun battlewagons could operate at the same speed, with the same turning radius and the same basic general characteristics. It made planning for that Decisive Battle much easier.
Then the 30s came with their new-fangled aeroplanes and carrier scouting forces and then Pearl happened and then Carrier Supremacy was the way of the future. It just so happened that we could make more carriers than the enemy could because lol murrica like 4th largest country in the world by volume and natural resources. (Fun fact, the contiguous US (the lower 48) stretches from Lisbon, Portugal to Moscow, Russia and thats just east-west.)
Not really. During the time, the 21 knot speed was pretty spritely for a ship massing 30,000t+. It's just that as time went on, more ships were getting faster. Warspite for instance did 24 knots (until the brits failed to unfuck her boilers repeatedly and she was left with lingering damage from world war 1).Yeah i know about mahanian doctrine and so on i was more referring to the fact that it seems to me that the US navy could have chosen to make all of the standards capable of moving at for instance 23 knots. that they didn't suggests to me at least that they deliberately chose to limit the standards to 21 knots so that the older vessels could operate with them and i just answered my own question didn't I?
Not really. During the time, the 21 knot speed was pretty spritely for a ship massing 30,000t+. It's just that as time went on, more ships were getting faster. Warspite for instance did 24 knots (until the brits failed to unfuck her boilers repeatedly and she was left with lingering damage from world war 1).
So the USN did a design study and said, okay we can get twelve 16"/50 guns on a platform that does 23 knots and is armored good against its own guns (20s Sodak would have had a 13.5" inclined belt, with 18" turret faces). Then the various Naval Treaties happened and the ships in construction had to be scrapped. Then the 35k ton weight limit from the 2LNT meant we had to get...creative with the North Carolina class...and invoke the escalator clause when Japan refused to commit to limiting gun sizes. As such we got a nine gun battleship capable of doing 27.5 knots and armored against 14" guns (Like the ones that the Kongou class used, this was what we designed the NC for)
Yes. Yes you did. The turn radius and flank speed for the Standards were the same as those of the Wyoming and New York classes. Though cost may also have been a factor, as devising a 23 knot hull would have been more expensive.Yeah i know about mahanian doctrine and so on i was more referring to the fact that it seems to me that the US navy could have chosen to make all of the standards capable of moving at for instance 23 knots. that they didn't suggests to me at least that they deliberately chose to limit the standards to 21 knots so that the older vessels could operate with them and i just answered my own question didn't I?
Warspite was built at the same time as Nevada, just so you know.Not really. During the time, the 21 knot speed was pretty spritely for a ship massing 30,000t+. It's just that as time went on, more ships were getting faster. Warspite for instance did 24 knots (until the brits failed to unfuck her boilers repeatedly and she was left with lingering damage from world war 1).
Just wait until he finds Akagi, Kaga, Soryū and Hiryū...If Paul Allen really wants a challenge, he could try hunting down the wreck of Oklahoma. We know where it is... to within a few hundred miles.
Probably for a while considering what got him banned...Do we know how long the OP is banned for? Or is this one effectively dead in the water here?
Yeah, was there for that. The mod's comment implied it might even be permanent iirc.
Yeah, was there for that. The mod's comment implied it might even be permanent iirc.
Honestly, I've found them significantly more reasonable and willing to listen to arguments/appeals than the mods over on SB, where being even slightly heated is an infraction if you are arguing against rightwing politics in America.Without discussing any particulars, I have been FAR less than pleased with my own encounters with the moderation staff on this site, and the exceptions they carve out for themselves when it comes to their own behavior, which is why I moved all my long form fiction to fanfiction.net a few months back. That said, the OP's status is officially showing as temp banned, not permanently banned.