Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you all! (Courtesy of uss Macon and the interwar navy)
 
Last edited:
Yes, and they were never confirmed to have actually been deployed on any Battleship. Now, whether that is true or not? Who knows.

Of course, this doesn't mean that they were never carried. By policy, the USN doesn't disclose which ships are actively carrying nuclear warheads.

It's true the Navy never confirms or denies that ships carry nuclear weapons, but we're pretty sure Iowa carried them in the 50s: we had a veteran on board who worked in projectile storage who remembers Marines stationed in his workplace. The only reason Marines would be in the main turrets would be to guard something. What would they be guarding? Katies!

What's the status of the North Carolina, Alabama and Massachusetts? I assume that they are also being used as part caches as well.

Actually, North Carolina is in excellent condition now. She recently received a new deck and quite a few areas have been completely restored. IIRC a documentary was recently done about her.

Yes but her working parts, turrets, secondary mounts and all were stripped to restore Iowa and Jersey for desert storm.

She certainly still looks pretty though.

North Carolina, Alabama, and Massachusetts already had most of their working parts ripped out to get the Iowa's operational in the 80s. With the Navy needing the Iowa's yet again, most likely they don't exist anymore -- cut apart for spare parts for the Iowa's. Realistically speaking, Iowa herself would be similar: maybe enough exterior to go back to being a museum, but the interior is completely gutted.

Yeah. At best it would have damaged the bow. At worst it would have ripped it clean off

Nah. The retaining pin holding the anchor chain to the capstan is a much more likely failure point. Or the anchor will just drag a trench through the sand.

I've said before that using the anchor to stop the ship is like gripping the road with your hands to try and stop your car. Realistically speaking unless the anchor scrapes the ship as it's being dropped, the only thing it will affect is the anchor itself.
 
North Carolina, Alabama, and Massachusetts already had most of their working parts ripped out to get the Iowa's operational in the 80s. With the Navy needing the Iowa's yet again, most likely they don't exist anymore -- cut apart for spare parts for the Iowa's. Realistically speaking, Iowa herself would be similar: maybe enough exterior to go back to being a museum, but the interior is completely gutted.

I doubt there are any spare parts left, to be honest. Or at least useful ones, since most of the spares would be for the Mark 6 rifle, the smaller engines, etc.

Maybe rammers and the like for the 5/38s, but the barrels of those -if they haven't been demilitarized - are likely too far gone from corrosion to be useful.

Honestly, the required spares would probably have to be built anew. Wonder if B&W still has the designs in a drawer somewhere...
 
If I remember correctly:

Iowa is the bored troll
Jersey is Jersey
Missouri is the movie starlet
Whisky is the weeb

Personally I always see Iowa as the sensible one: Both the class leader and the one that carried presidents.

Jersey is so anticommunist because she served the most against them: 4 battle stars in Korea (verses Iowa's 2) as well as service in Vietnam.

Missouri is definitely the movie star/ singer. I've always seen her and Jersey having a rivalry: Jersey is more decorated, but Missouri is more famous.

Wisconsin is of course the cheese weeb; the American Haruna.
 
Last edited:
Merry Christmas everyone!

May it be filled with good cheer, love, and warm feelings.

Some cute as well.
 
Wonder if B&W still has the designs in a drawer somewhere...

Honestly yes, I believe they do. I do believe that it is a part of the building contract that the companies that produce the parts for military hardware are required to keep a master copy of specs and designs for every system they build for the DiD. Now they are likely on microfiche or microfilm, but they are stored Im pretty sure.
 
Honestly yes, I believe they do. I do believe that it is a part of the building contract that the companies that produce the parts for military hardware are required to keep a master copy of specs and designs for every system they build for the DiD. Now they are likely on microfiche or microfilm, but they are stored Im pretty sure.

Of course, the industry required to build such things is also a bit on the thin side.
 
Of course, the industry required to build such things is also a bit on the thin side.

Just depends on the parts. A lot of smaller parts would be able to be manufactured more quickly through the use of CNC machining. Other items might have to be manufactured the old way, but there are many skilled machinists in this country who would be up to the challenge. Some things would require the actual tooling to be made to make the parts, but that is hardly impossible. The U.S. may not have the numbers of manufacturing facilities and shipyards that we had in 1944, but we didn't have those facilities in 1939 either. Demand will lead to production. It just takes a couple of years to spin it up.
 
try non existent. there is no factory in the world that has the knowledge to make parts for weapon systems built in the 1940's.
The M1911 would like a word with you. Yes, I know it wasn't invented in then 1940's, but it was being produced, which is within your parameters.
 
try non existent. there is no factory in the world that has the knowledge to make parts for weapon systems built in the 1940's.

We aren't talking about the pyramids or stonehenge. Enough examples of most things are available for reverse engineering, if the schematics aren't available. The people who worked on the assembly lines are old but some are still in good enough shape to give advice. How much information is available online just because of re-enactors research or gamers research? Imagine how much could be found with the dedicated effort of the USN and American industry?
 
We aren't talking about the pyramids or stonehenge. Enough examples of most things are available for reverse engineering, if the schematics aren't available. The people who worked on the assembly lines are old but some are still in good enough shape to give advice. How much information is available online just because of re-enactors research or gamers research? Imagine how much could be found with the dedicated effort of the USN and American industry?
I mean...we could probably make those, too, if we wanted. We do have the examples to work from. Something like the Colossus of Rhodes, on the other hand, would be a much less accurate reproduction.

As for building new Battleships, we could probably scrape by with parts that might not 100% match, but are close enough. Hell, we could probably do fine with any sort of mechanism for the internals that does what we need it to. While the infrastructure is a bit of a bugger, the infrastructure isn't impossible. It'd just be expensive.
 
Back
Top