Meanwhile, Hood (when she hears of the news) starts laughing maniacally at the sheer poetry of Abyssmarck's demise.
Meanwhile, Hood (when she hears of the news) starts laughing maniacally at the sheer poetry of Abyssmarck's demise.
You know, this would actually explain so much why many of my things went missing.Richardson: I am this close to giving up.
Hiei: *discreetly tips a sub*
Seriously Silversides? I told you to stay in the Great Lakes and you slip off to the other side of the planet just to troll someone I know on the internet?You know, this would actually explain so much why many of my things went missing.
It was being hornswoggled by a sub.
...What part of 'for surface ships' implied I meant the subs? Hell, look back up the chain. The guy mentioned US torpedoes sucking. I pointed out that Albie knew how to use them. His response was that he wasn't referring to the US subs. I can only assume, then, that he meant the torpedoes being used by the surface ships...which have guns, which reduces their reliance on torpedoes.. . .
Dude, subs have guns that belongs to destroyers. All the good that you're gonna do is just scratch Bisko's paint at best.
They'll be rekt by Bisko's secondaries if they try to surface and attack. Not to mention that doing that is practically suicide.
Yeah, I know. Again, I was talking about SURFACE SHIPS. Destroyers, Crusiers, Battleships. Okay, aircraft carriers are surface ships without decent guns, so that's kinda a flaw in my statement, should you want to nitpick. But this was not what I was talking about.If a sub is using her gun on anything but a defenseless merchant...that is a dead sub.
Rereading your post again, I realized my mistake as well. Sorry for that.I'm actually kinda offended you thought I was such a neophyte that I was saying that the subs should use their guns on Bismarck, if I'm being honest. I'm not the world's greatest tactician, but I'm not that bad.
Not to mention any direct hits on a sub would mortally wound it.If a sub is using her gun on anything but a defenseless merchant...that is a dead sub.
"Candygram for Abyssmarck! Candygram for Abyssmarck!"Can't we just distract the crazy Nazibote with a Hitler doll full of explosives? Looney Tunes style?
Apology accepted. No worries, it happens. More annoyed than mad. I know some people really are that ignorant.Rereading your post again, I realized my mistake as well. Sorry for that.
Also, it's really hard to fire conventional guns underwater. Which is kinda the whole point of making a submarine in the first place. Deck guns were mostly for targets that couldn't shoot back, or possibly as a last-resort, if everything's FUBAR. Might as well give it shot, in that case.Not to mention any direct hits on a sub would mortally wound it.
Ah. Sorry for jumping to conclusions. Though I would like to point out that misunderstandings like this are why I tend to quote the message I'm responding to, even if it's directly above. Because you can either get ninja'd, or (in this case) leave someone thinking you got ninja'd, and taking it the wrong way. Still, I probably should have looked a bit closer at the time-stamps. My bad.I mean. I was just replying to the post directly above mine. But whatever.
to be fair, while US torpedoes have problems the sub crews knew how to fix them by mid-late 42, the problem was getting Bourds to implement those fixes during building rather than have to make the crews fix them.
Reading closely at that chapter I think she was U-511 but I'm not sure.She's Abyssal...she was the one who sank Wisky. And no, I don't think she's been caught yet.
But we still don't know where or what happened to her though.Can't wait to see her get a face full of depth charges for what she did to Wisky.
Poor NewRogatoga probably has identity issuesAw ACR-2, so cute. Too bad she got scuttled at the beginning of the war.