See belowNo? That would require a complexity of strike missions more advanced than 1960's standard. ASAT is not a magical effort, and the ionosphere provides massive cover for a theoretical strike from EMP effect alone. Also, why would it require engaging the ASAT network? it would just be by blinding it and in case of a larger effort the orbital stations are fairly vulnerable to effectively casseted shots of fragments in opposite orbits from anyone that has any form of space launch capacity that is not actively getting burned down, which shows by the lack interception of this strike in the lower atmosphere/acceleration phase, our network cannot burn said capacity down. This added to the lack of decoys in the heads they fired or the ability for rapid maneuvering due to trajectory. Decoy saturation alone would have greatly increased leakage rate as there would be 4-5 decoys for every warhead, effectively ensuring that defensive networks could be over-saturated massively increasing penetration rate. My point is more that with this strike they were not trying that hard to kill us, this was a limited counterforce strike not inherently strategic, and was using primarily tactical systems. Nothing in this represents well, the total capability of NOD/allies and is more of a spoiling strike showing that they are willing to do far worse if pushed hard enough.
To clarify what missiles were used overall:I'm not at all sure that any of this stuff ever really broke up out of the stratosphere, at least of the stuff that actually landed on GDI bases.
So, yes. A few missiles may have got above 50km and so into the mesosphere, but likely only barely.They used cruise missiles, SRBMs, and some IRBMs shooting some very depressed trajectories. Nothing close to an all up ICBM.
And yes. Anything Nod tries to launch through the mesophere that GDI can detect, gets burned down. (Which means anything which doesn't have a GDI IFF.) We also spent over a thousand Progress on Orbital Cleanup, with the result that by Q2 2062, "the near-Earth orbitals are cleaner than they have been since before the Apollo program". I personally wouldn't be surprised if our ASAT command stations were getting defensive upgrades including energy shields, as well. And the assertion that the network cannot burn down space launches because it did not go after missiles which did not reach its engagement envelope does not make sense to me. Also, the assertion that there were no decoys employed seems unsupported.
Overall, yes, this was a moderately limited counterforce strike, but the assertions that specific technologies/tactics would massively change the outcome are not supported.
We don't actually know this.Also, a lot of the strike packages weren't actually launched by al-Isfahani. He may not even have known about them, except perhaps for vague "you are not forgotten" language from the relevant warlords. So the targeting priorities probably reflect a wide range of different warlords' attitude and philosophies.