[x] Yog
So she is just typical Exalted PC?Molly has a disease, I swear, she can't help but think of the most drama-worthy option and try to go for it. I'd call them delusions of grandeur but they have very much proved to not be delusions at all.
No. We have previously asked for and received plans. The Crown is perfectly capable of mind reading. If they have intentions / plans, we can get them. It doesn't change that they can change those plans later.Trying to figure out what they are intending contravenes Free Will, so the Crown doesnt work.
And trying to negotiate with them when you have done no independent research is literally schmuck bait.
If they are as reasonable as Lydia, I see no issue with releasing them.If you want to know what the morals of a sixth century British warlord would be you could do worse than looking at Lydia, she masks it reasonably well most of the time, but she is more than a bit out of step with the modern world.
Iku is dead for good now, which is much better than being sealed anymore.*points at Iku-Turso*
No thank you. Sealed Evils In a Can are sealed for a reason.
Nah, she almost never chooses the fun option.[X] Offer to strengthen the door that leads to the prison of the three and onto Arthur's return from Avalon
Molly has a disease, I swear, she can't help but think of the most drama-worthy option and try to go for it. I'd call them delusions of grandeur but they have very much proved to not be delusions at all.
Nah, she almost never chooses the fun option.
She's the worst Exalted this age has seen so far, or rather not seen, because she hasn't even become a visible power among mortals yet.
Okay, maybe sometimes.I mean she did end up in the depths hell with a fey-crafted biological weapon after setting off to Boston to check out college. I'd say she sometimes chooses the fun option.
Yes we are trying to avoid complete chaos without a plan of action since we don't want to see a shitload of people killed. That isn't a bad thing. There's a reason why Nemesis, the Outsider who wants to destroy reality, is trying to break it on his terms.
That would track if he's one at all; the question is if he's wood, water, or earth in descending order of probability. I'm highlighting those because their skill sets match his alleged abilities best and fit his interactions with the fey better.Wait. I am stupid. Arthur Pendragon. He's totally a dragonblooded exalt.
Lydia never conquered a kingdom for herself or set out to otherwise set herself up with power over mortals. Similar cultural context doesn't necessarily make for similar motives. Just go read some of those welsh triads, these guys all got up to some stuff:If they are as reasonable as Lydia, I see no issue with releasing them.
Three Unrestrained Ravagings of the Island of Britain: The first of them when Medrawd came to Arthur's Court at Celliwig in Cornwall; he left neither food nor drink in the court that he did not consume. And he dragged Gwenhwyfar from her royal chair, and then he struck a blow upon her; The second Unrestrained Ravaging when Arthur came to Medrawd's court. He left neither food nor drink in the court; And the third Unrestrained Ravaging when Aeddan the Wily came to the court of Rhydderch the Generous at Alclud [Dumbarton]; he left neither food nor drink nor beast alive.
Three Red Ravagers of the Island of Britain: Rhun son of Beli, and Lleu Skilful Hand, and Morgant the Wealthy. But there was one who was a Red Ravager greater than all three: Arthur was his name. For a year neither grass nor plants used to spring up where one of the three would walk; but where Arthur went, not for seven years.
Given the jurisprudence of the time considered stuff like drawing and quartering people, crucifixion and the like to be appropriate punishments?If you want to know what the morals of a sixth century British warlord would be you could do worse than looking at Lydia, she masks it reasonably well most of the time, but she is more than a bit out of step with the modern world.
When the skinwalkers chased us to the Raith estate, we used the Crown to ask and it went Null.No. We have previously asked for and received plans. The Crown is perfectly capable of mind reading. If they have intentions / plans, we can get them. It doesn't change that they can change those plans later.
As to the prisoners - the biggest two questions are "are they willing to adapt?" (how rigid are they in their morals, are they willing to accept that the customs have changed, stuff like that) and "how much do they want to rule?"
Make no mistake, we would die. And we would not die alone; megadeaths would accompany us.Iku is dead for good now, which is much better than being sealed anymore.
I'd release every single sealed evil in this world, to give it a shot at doing better or dying by our blade.
She's the ONLY Exalt this age has seen so far.Nah, she almost never chooses the fun option.
She's the worst Exalted this age has seen so far, or rather not seen, because she hasn't even become a visible power among mortals yet.
If I was a Brit? I would much rather have Gordon Brown or Lizzy II.Okay, maybe sometimes.
But that was again an option that was completely in the "magical world".
Her refusal, our refusal, to shatter the masquerade and upset the setting remains.
I'd rather have Arthur in charge than Gordon Brown, or Lizzy II..
Reasonable?If they are as reasonable as Lydia, I see no issue with releasing them.
Worst? Really?Nah, she almost never chooses the fun option.
She's the worst Exalted this age has seen so far, or rather not seen, because she hasn't even become a visible power among mortals yet
And when we asked for Mab's plans, we got Mab's plans. Same in several other situations.When the skinwalkers chased us to the Raith estate, we used the Crown to ask and it went Null.
Because plans that do not exist, or which are in flux, are covered by Free Will.
You will similarly get nothing here, because they dont have sufficient information to have plans.
Again, these are Free Will questions.
If one of our circlemates died, and we knew of a resurrection artefact, and couldn't craft one ourselves, we absolutely would storm the gates of hell for them. In fact, we have just recently stormed the gates of hell, and unleashed a weapon of mass destruction that is firmly in breach of "Thou Shalt Not Invade the Mind of Another" Law.Reasonable?
They are the sort of people who thought it was a good idea to invade the Celtic underworld and attempt to steal the Celtic death god's Cauldron of Rebirth to resurrect someone who had already died naturally.
Nowadays the White Council would call them necromancers in contravention of the Fifth Law and shoot them.
There is nothing in their history that we are told that makes them sound like reasonable people.
We are very much looking at Greek hero style people here.
Great story characters. Terrible neighbors.
I'm not sure if Saint David was making a moral judgement on resurrection or just saying 'Man, this freaking pain in the ass really should just stay dead'. 😆Okay but who is Saint David to decide that. Obviously God doesn't have a problem with the dead living before Judgment Day rolls around. There are multiple resurrections in the Bible and Dresden himself brings himself literally back to life.
Who is Saint David other than apparently a sanctimonious prick who just decided hey if you can bring yourself to life don't actually because my particular interpretation of our shared religion says you cannot and should not do that.
Mab actually had plans in motion though. These guys are in an afterlife prison, if they don't know what's going on they can't have a plan for it.And when we asked for Mab's plans, we got Mab's plans. Same in several other situations.
Neither of these are law breaches. Using a divine artifact or fey super weapon isn't mortal magic; the council might have practical issues with the fallout, but couldn't reasonably charge these guys or us as warlocks.If one of our circlemates died, and we knew of a resurrection artefact, and couldn't craft one ourselves, we absolutely would storm the gates of hell for them. In fact, we have just recently stormed the gates of hell, and unleashed a weapon of mass destruction that is firmly in breach of "Thou Shalt Not Invade the Mind of Another" Law
This is nonsense. You can argue that it doesn't apply to this character or that, but tell me Jason was a great guy with a straight face.And, as I mentioned before, the "greek hero" is a load of sh*t attempt to devalue the good heroes did and do and their character.
CiteA hero (feminine: heroine) is a real person or a main fictional character who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, courage, or strength. The original hero type of classical epics did such things for the sake of glory and honor. Post-classical and modern heroes, on the other hand, perform great deeds or selfless acts for the common good instead of the classical goal of wealth, pride, and fame