1) Po-tayt-o po-tah-to. It's an embodied artificial intelligence. Because it has a body, it is clearly artificial, and it is clearly intelligent enough to communicate with humans for a long time.
2) Possible, but very unlikely based on everything else
3) Most likely it's a recreation / patch job. Someone in ancient Egypt found some Age of Legends artifact or spirit or whatever, and repaired / repurposed it using what they had available. So electrium instead of orichalcium, marble instead of magical jade, etc. Note that we have seemed to knock out the egyptian overlay - the color of the text, the language used, and the words spoken changed once it ran into an error.
4) Yeah, ok, I misremembered.
5) Then use the crown. If you are assuming that it is lying and pretending then talking to it doesn't help.
1) No, there's a difference.
AI is used for disembodied intelligences. Constructs are discrete entities who are in whole in the same body.
===
2) No idea.
===
3)Cant be.
For one thing, patchwork would be obvious. And there is zero evidence that many, if any, non-Exalts can repair the products of Exalted crafting in this AU. And if they could, they sure as hell wouldnt be using WOOD.
Secondly, First Age crafters worked in magical materials for this kind of thing, in orichalcum, moonsilver, jade, starmetal, soulsteel and adamant. None of that is evident here, at all. The idea that you can simply substitute shit like electrum for orichalcum seems as implausible as the idea of substituting glass for diamond in a cutting tool.
This is pretty clearly downtime work.
Specifically, cedarwood is native to the western Himalayas and the Mediterranean at elevations of 1000-3000m, which tells us where the raw materials were sourced, and where the maker likely lived.
===
5)After we try and get further information to expand our understanding and refine our choice of questions?
THEN I would use the Crown.
We dont have an excess of Crown foci that relate to this thing.
Our missing 9 HLs disagrees.
We've gotten stabbed twice; getting stabbed more is inexcusable.
No, there is no such implication. "I am suffering a stroke" does not imply that "I do not have a flu".
There is a difference between Function and Primary Function.
Its choice of words appear to have been very specific.
You know a terminal loss of primary function in any sense of a living construct means it's dying right.
Yeah, no.
You literally have no idea what its primary function is supposed to be.
Thats a wildass claim to make.
If my TV's cable connectors stop working, its primary function to watch broadcast TV is gone.
It doesnt stop me using it as a computer monitor.
Similarly, if my laptop's batteries die and arent replaced, I can no longer use it in its primary function as a mobile device.
That doesnt mean I cant use it plugged in to the mains as a home computer.
I could go on.