Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm trying to remember whether or not Black Beetle ever uses the term 'meat' when other non-Scarab Reach people are around. It could just be that he's really racist.
Most likely, "meat" could just be a way of saying the Reach view non-Reach people as nothing more than livestock for them to raise, breed, and kill at their will which does fit their methodology.
 
That's a bit of a pity; they are possibly my two favorite characters, despite their stories being respectively negligibly shown and a little stale by the end.

It happens. Vision is insanely easy to butterfly out of existence completely in most Marvel continuities that have him. However cool he may be, his origin relies on a long series of very specific events. And while Paul could have conceivably recognized an origin story and allowed it to play its course in the hopes of getting a hero out of it, the morality of such an action is questionable at best.

I call it the Bruce Wayne dilemma. Similar to the baby Hitler dilemma in some ways. If there's a young boy, and you know for a fact that if events are unaltered his parents will be murdered, but that their murder eventually turns that young boy into the single greatest force for good on the earth, does that knowledge justify allowing the boy's parents to die?

On the one hand, allowing the boy to follow his "destiny" is a net positive to the state of the world, and is guaranteed to save more than the two lives that were sacrificed. On the other hand, you just allowed a young boy to become an orphan knowing full well that you could have stopped it at any time in any number of ways. You also doomed the boy to a lifetime of servitude toward the wellbeing of the world. He will never again be as happy as he was before. But, his actions would allow millions of other people to live happier, safer lives.

This same dilemma can be applied to the vast majority of superheroes. And while the balance certainly shifts between examples, (compare allowing Stephen Strange's car wreck vs allowing the destruction of Krypton,) the end reasoning is pretty much the same. Is allowing a large amount of personal pain or even death within a small group justified by knowledge of eventual, indirect consequences that would improve or save the lives of vastly superior numbers of people?
 
Eh, if the DCverse 16 had it as Destiny, it wouldn't matter that Orange Lantern spared the boy the injury (directly or indirectly due to other things he did); something would contrive to have it happen. It still could, even. All it would take is something mucking up the Zeta Tubes and cutting off Happy Harbor (or "Happy Harbour" now) when Garfield gets a similar injury, with no way to find his blood type quickly enough.

Contrived as heck, if not written very well as its own plot device to be resolved.

Or it could go another direction. Garfield's connection to Megan is due to that incident in canon, but nothing says they can't have a similar relationship just out of proximity and friendship. If he gets inspired by Wally's foolishness when Wally was 12 by the time Garfield is, himself, 12...
 
It happens. Vision is insanely easy to butterfly out of existence completely in most Marvel continuities that have him. However cool he may be, his origin relies on a long series of very specific events. And while Paul could have conceivably recognized an origin story and allowed it to play its course in the hopes of getting a hero out of it, the morality of such an action is questionable at best.

I call it the Bruce Wayne dilemma. Similar to the baby Hitler dilemma in some ways. If there's a young boy, and you know for a fact that if events are unaltered his parents will be murdered, but that their murder eventually turns that young boy into the single greatest force for good on the earth, does that knowledge justify allowing the boy's parents to die?

On the one hand, allowing the boy to follow his "destiny" is a net positive to the state of the world, and is guaranteed to save more than the two lives that were sacrificed. On the other hand, you just allowed a young boy to become an orphan knowing full well that you could have stopped it at any time in any number of ways. You also doomed the boy to a lifetime of servitude toward the wellbeing of the world. He will never again be as happy as he was before. But, his actions would allow millions of other people to live happier, safer lives.

This same dilemma can be applied to the vast majority of superheroes. And while the balance certainly shifts between examples, (compare allowing Stephen Strange's car wreck vs allowing the destruction of Krypton,) the end reasoning is pretty much the same. Is allowing a large amount of personal pain or even death within a small group justified by knowledge of eventual, indirect consequences that would improve or save the lives of vastly superior numbers of people?
The thing is, if you're in an SI scenario, there's plenty more room for random variance to screw stuff up. Butterfly flaps it's wings and Bruce Wayne is paralyzed in a training accident before he can become Batman. There's no guarantees, so I'd just prevent the tragedy in front of me, personally.
 
The thing is, if you're in an SI scenario, there's plenty more room for random variance to screw stuff up. Butterfly flaps it's wings and Bruce Wayne is paralyzed in a training accident before he can become Batman. There's no guarantees, so I'd just prevent the tragedy in front of me, personally.
Well, we've seen how Beast Boy's YJ origin was averted quite naturally. I would guess Jaime's will be averted by Ted Kord not dying. I mean, let's be honest; Jaime's origin is one of massive coincidence, being in the wrong place at the right time. Though again, an equally coincidental origin could be contrived if the author wished.

Though with the Orange Lantern going after the Reach NOW, it seems unlikely that Blue Beetle would have the storyline he has in season 2 at all.
 
I mean if they could go 50/50 with the lanterns then I'm assuming they have to be close in power to a ring user. I always sort of took the scarabs as having the offensive power of a Lantern, but lacking any of the other utility functions. I could be wrong.
A somewhat common truism (I think it's even come up in this fic) is that a Power Ring is the greatest tool in the universe, while a scarab is the greatest weapon.

Meanwhile, the Scientist and the Ambassador never demonstrate any morphing of their armor at all, but are pretty clearly Scarab-controlled minions. I'm not sure if "Beetle" is the warrior class, and the other scarabs are of differing configurations with different abilities or not. That would make a certain amount of sense in terms of explaining why only Black Beetle ever fought, rather than the Ambassador or Scientist doing so.

So, are they "meat" slaves to their scarabs, or are they the actual Reach masterminds? I had thought, from the "meat" comments from all levels, that the Reach were a race of machines that need organic hosts for full consciousness, but which completely overrode their hosts' wills with the Mode's directives.
My interpretation is that the Scientist and the Ambassador are members of the Reach species, with no scarabs. And that the scarabs are their soldiers, and follow their orders.

I'm trying to remember whether or not Black Beetle ever uses the term 'meat' when other non-Scarab Reach people are around. It could just be that he's really racist.
Yes, he has.
 
Looking back here, he got this message before mentioning anything beyond that he was coming:

That implies that the Darkstars had some kind of observation going on of events outside the caves they were in, or they wouldn't have said "further" assistance.
Good point, even if it seemed unintentional from Zoat. Although the line should be "Weren't you paying attention" instead of "listening".
I know Blue Beetle's scarab has advocated a nuclear strike before, leading me to believe it must possess some equivalent, and claims to have weapons that could harm the Spectre. The wiki I read says it possesses weapons of "Theological Implications" which I take to mean either it has god-killers or something so huge that it could be mistaken for a god itself.
Seems like their passive defensive abilities aren't all that strong compared to their offensive abilities. Black Beetle had his suit damaged, albeit briefly, by Arsenal's laser arm. On the other hand, Blue Beetle had trouble doing anything meaningful against Black Beetle, so IDK.
Then that got me wondering. OL wears power armor right? I haven't seen any built in weapons, that I remember, but it does make him stronger and such so I"m wondering....how is he powering it? It's not running on ring charge, so it has to have some kind of fancy battery. Considering a feasible power source is what is currently stymying RL powered armor, and I'm betting is an issue for the DCU earth as well. He doesn't have a mini bleed generator in that sucker does he?
I believe it's a bleed generator, but I don't remember any mention of it.
Edit: Unrelated, and perhaps answered ages ago, but with the change to the Logans' condition, is Beast Boy going to exist in this story? I kind-of wonder how he'd get his powers since he was spared the tragedy-induced opportunity.
He got his powers due to seeing his mother dead, and his powers were templated off of M'gann's blood (I'm fairly sure this is the majority opinion of the community, even if it isn't directly stated in the show). Although the blood transfusion and his mom dying never happened, he could still experience some similarly traumatic event and gain some metahuman power. He likely wouldn't be Beast Boy, but Garfield Logan could gain powers of one description or another.
 
I didn't think his mother's death had anything to do with his powers, just with him now having to live with the only semi-adult figures left in his life. I thought his powers were purely manifested from the blood transfusion.
 
I didn't think his mother's death had anything to do with his powers, just with him now having to live with the only semi-adult figures left in his life. I thought his powers were purely manifested from the blood transfusion.

If memory serves, he's a Metahuman. So the blood transfusion activated his dormant Meta-gene. You couldn't reliably do the same to other humans and get the same result.
 
I didn't think his mother's death had anything to do with his powers, just with him now having to live with the only semi-adult figures left in his life. I thought his powers were purely manifested from the blood transfusion.
I don't think it was purely from the blood transfusion, because his shapeshifting is different from Martian shapeshifting in a few ways: 1. He doesn't conserve mass, while Martians do, 2. He can't change color while Martians can, and 3. He can only change into animals, which isn't how Martian shapeshifting works at all. M'gann has shown the ability to make more arms appear wherever, so she's not limited to preexisting forms.

Plus there's the whole Reach experimentation thing where powers get activated by extreme stress, which fits what happened here.
 
I don't think it was purely from the blood transfusion, because his shapeshifting is different from Martian shapeshifting in a few ways: 1. He doesn't conserve mass, while Martians do, 2. He can't change color while Martians can, and 3. He can only change into animals, which isn't how Martian shapeshifting works at all. M'gann has shown the ability to make more arms appear wherever, so she's not limited to preexisting forms.

Plus there's the whole Reach experimentation thing where powers get activated by extreme stress, which fits what happened here.

It's implied the "animals only" part is psychosomatic, a consequence of his trauma that he could work to get past. He does change color, if only between different shades of green. And unless his clothing is shapeshifted like M'Gann, which would seem to break both "animals only" and "shades of green", he has some way of "stowing" those somewhere when in animal form that he can retrieve them from later. All that taken together means his shapeshifting is most probably potentially much more powerful than a Martian's.
 
He has a specialized shapeshifting onesie that he wears in season 2. We never see him shapeshift without it in YJ. But I think he's got the "crap now I'm naked" problem if he doesn't have it on him when he shifts and reverts to a form that cares about clothes.
 
And unless his clothing is shapeshifted like M'Gann, which would seem to break both "animals only" and "shades of green", he has some way of "stowing" those somewhere when in animal form that he can retrieve them from later. All that taken together means his shapeshifting is most probably potentially much more powerful than a Martian's.

From the YJ wiki:

Equipment
  • Bio-Suit: Miss Martian gave Gar a Martian Bio-Suit and pre-telepathically programmed it for two settings:[28] form fitting collar or full body-suit.[3]
 
I'm trying to remember whether or not Black Beetle ever uses the term 'meat' when other non-Scarab Reach people are around. It could just be that he's really racist.

Going by what you said about how Reach society is either 'kill 'em all' or 'enslave them all' regarding aliens, 'meat' could just be arrogance and superiority, seeing anything not Reach as 'meat for the slaughter'.

Not to cross streams too much, but that attitude reminds a little of the Draka. In the books beyond accusations of author fiat as to their victory, the Draka attitude was that their victory over the ferals was not just a societal goal, but something almost inevitable.

That theme and attitude I see here or in what Zoat says. Kill or enslave, and be friendly long enough to continually fuck everyone else over.

The GLC should have removed this cancer from the stars. That they didn't means it now is harder.
 
So.
It has been vaguely implied, but not made outright clear, that the following are true:
A) The Reach engage in mind control of all individuals within their grasp within certain limits. Like demons, one cannot be part of the Reach without wholly agreeing with them - because all dissenters are personality-killed or body-killed.
B) Paul knows this from a mix of GLC database entries and his own knowledge of canon.

This has not been made explicit in story, and would cast a very different light on what Paul has been doing if true.
Spider Guild gets treated with some degree of kindness because they have a culture of evil, but are not wholly dedicated to it, have individual variance beyond it, and could stop doing it in the future.
Demons don't, because one does not count as a demon unless they are personally, devotedly, near-irrevocably or wholly-irrevocably evil; if you aren't evil, your soul is butchered for power.
Gordanians do, for the same reasons as the Spider Guild.
Reach don't, for the same reasons as demons - with less 'thousands of years of injecting Magical Evil and torture' and more 'nanotech mind-control on whatever scale they're confident they can get away with'.

Zoat, could you clarify?
 
The Green Lantern Corps doesn't have the manpower.

During the GLC-Reach war, did the Lanterns have lethal force engaged? And were the Reach given the GLC's full and undivided attention?

The explanation I was going to go for in my DC SI was that while the Reach were able to engage in total war against the Corps, the GLC themselves still had the no-kill rule, and they had most of their forces focused on the rest of the galactic crises. Meanwhile there weren't any worthwhile allies the GLC could call on for support in the area, so it was entirely Lanterns and primitive space fleets of neighboring races the Reach hadn't subsumed yet.
 
Y'know, it's sort of unfortunate we've just moved on from Tamaran. The latest issue of Green Lanterns revealed that tone of the ...new I suppose? First Seven Lanterns is actually a Tamaranean. Granted, he's from before his people evolved into quite so humanoid a form so he's a bit more feline, but given we've seen him for all of about 4 pages including his origin story I do find that Tyran'r is pretty awesome.

He has a real He-Man/Conan vibe to him, and he's still running around nowadays as the sentinel of the ancient Vault of Shadows in Sector 180, where the Guardians hide their honored dead secrets as opposed to the Chamber of Shadows, which was where they hid their prisoner secrets.

For what it's worth the other Seven revealed so far are an Old Goddess of Urgrund, a White Martian refugee from a Clint Eastwood movie, and an ancient female ancestor of the Dox family of Colu.
 
Last edited:
During the GLC-Reach war, did the Lanterns have lethal force engaged? And were the Reach given the GLC's full and undivided attention?

The explanation I was going to go for in my DC SI was that while the Reach were able to engage in total war against the Corps, the GLC themselves still had the no-kill rule, and they had most of their forces focused on the rest of the galactic crises. Meanwhile there weren't any worthwhile allies the GLC could call on for support in the area, so it was entirely Lanterns and primitive space fleets of neighboring races the Reach hadn't subsumed yet.

Pretty sure Zoat outright mentioned that the Reach was just too big and technologically advanced for the GLC to fight without taking massive casualties, losing an immense amount of resources and taking decades to over a hundred years. People seem to keep overestimating power rings and underestimating the races that are very high on the tech tree.
 
Last edited:
The Green Lantern Corps doesn't have the manpower.
soooo the guardians decided to play "if i ignore it, it cant hurt me?" >.<
the problem is, if fighting the reach would be a Pyrrhic victory, ignoreing them long-term like the will-mainlining idiot-savants have is outright STUPIDITY.
long-term, its either "be crippled for several decades/ a human-mortal "generation" after breaking this rabidly expansionist polity apart, or have literally everything we EXIST for,everything we've WORKED for for EONS burnt to ashes when the force balance shifts enough that they decide to stop PRETENDING to follow the treaty"
 
Last edited:
During the GLC-Reach war, did the Lanterns have lethal force engaged? And were the Reach given the GLC's full and undivided attention?

AFAIK, the first and only time the GLC Kill Restriction was lifted was during the War of Light when there were two other full scale Lantern Corps at war with them. Also, IIRC, the restriction was only lifted for Red Lanterns and Sinestro Corps members.
 
soooo the guardians decided to play "if i ignore it, it cant hurt me?" >.<
the problem is, if fighting the reach would be a Pyrrhic victory, ignoreing them long-term like the will-mainlining idiot-savants have is outright STUPIDITY.
long-term, its either "be crippled for several decades/ a human-mortal "generation" after breaking this rabidly expansionist polity apart, or have literally everything we EXIST for,everything we've WORKED for for EONS burnt to ashes when the force balance shifts enough that they decide to stop PRETENDING to follow the treaty"
Just because the GLC isn't fighting a war against them doesn't mean nothing is being done. The Guardians may be working on destabilising the Reach from the inside so as not to require the GLC to tear itself apart against them. Instigating a civil war so that the Reach rips itself apart then cleaning up the scraps is easier than fighting a unified Reach.

The Guardians have been in this business for millions of years, and are still alive and in power. They probably have something planned even if it isn't obvious.
 
Just because the GLC isn't fighting a war against them doesn't mean nothing is being done. The Guardians may be working on destabilising the Reach from the inside so as not to require the GLC to tear itself apart against them. Instigating a civil war so that the Reach rips itself apart then cleaning up the scraps is easier than fighting a unified Reach.

The Guardians have been in this business for millions of years, and are still alive and in power. They probably have something planned even if it isn't obvious.

Plus, while the Green Lantern Corps may not be taking shots at them, there's nothing saying the Corpse isn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top