Re: Jamelia doesn't have the temperament -
Temperament doesn't even make sense to me. Kessler didn't have the temperament until ... suddenly he did because he made a choice. She may not have had the full knowledge of herself but Jamelia
already was leadership from the start of the quest. In the op-centric new NWO, being a senior agent and Director of her own team, she is one of the top 3 leaders of the NWO and she's already created policy for the NWO (restart of the psyschic program).
"I must confess, you're right too." Jamelia taps her fingers against her leg. "So. We are both... how to put it? Inner Circle candidates?"
This line - and its choice of words - makes no sense to me just as 'oh hey, we're both E6.' There are other words that could have been chosen to represent E6. This entire scene appeared to be an acknowledgment that Kessler has become an equal to Jamelia (where he had been subordinate before), that they both intended to shape the future of the Technocracy as leaders within their respective spheres.
Re: Rose
I think there's two arguments being made.
1. This particular Sera-Rose scene in specific and its relation within the immediate character arc over the course of the quest
2. Some nebulous future for Rose (what's cut off, what's available to her)
The 2nd one is just theory crafting over a much longer period of time (probably outside of the scope of the quest beyond a mention in an eiplogue just like Henriette). If Rose is within her teenager phase where she moves toward defining herself as the adult Rose, there's a question about how strong should setbacks shape Rose's development. I don't think that any setbacks or hesitation - things generally viewed as obstacles to be overcome for other characters - should be treated as set-in-stone failures where Rose just can't ever hack it now and for the rest of her life. Kessler couldn't hack it until he could, Jamelia couldn't hack it until he could, Sera couldn't... This is exacerbated that Rose is in her teenage phase where she should be at her most wide open as to possibilities for the future.
I mean, everyone's apparently heard of this story where Luke ran away from Darth Vader on the Death Star and that was it. This setback defined his life - he failed and is always going to be a failure who couldn't hack it against Vader - and he never came back again. What?
I don't even want to get into that this (in theory) arc for Rose basically featured all her agency being stolen by Donald, and now, apparently, even her super special subplot got stolen by a guy who isn't even on screen and has never talked with or met (or perhaps even thought of) Reina in the first place. Assuming Rose is also a hero like the rest of the team, what kind of character arc is this? No one else on our team gets as a crappy of an arc riddled with failure and theft like this - and not even in their backstory but in the quest itself.
But that starts to verge into question 1. I get the idea of what is being aimed for, but I disagree on how to get to the point of an explosive confrontation with Sera.
First, I think the mumbo jumbo handwave as to why Sera thinks she has to meet with Rose - complete with the super patronizing reason - is just as ridiculous as apparently the other way around would be. Why is it necessary that Rose needs to know about evil space ghost progenitors? I don't know. It doesn't seem to match any of the built up themes. We haven't seen hide or tail of anyone like ISOBEL, and all anyone's talked about is apparently Blanc or Blake in an Exemplar meatsuit. (Why these two, I don't know either. But whatever.) All the Exemplar IV stuff seemed to be is a better Exemplar III, which both Sera and Rose are fully aware of in the first place, having worked on it. And for that matter, all the choices re: Exemplar IV seemed to verge more on EVA-stuff like Yinzheng.
Second, this is a very passive Rose when she should be an actor with agency. This was covered in several posts earlier so I'll leave it at that.
Third, this is a mirror of what Reina did, a perhaps well-meaning maternal figure (as representative of the Technocracy) upending Rose's character and forcing change down her throat. It means the Demise arc was a wasted one for Rose's character development because she didn't learn anything from Reina breaking her conditioning in the way she did. She didn't develop so it was apparently just gratuitous pain porn (for her). It means it's now been
two arcs of watching Rose struggling to get out of a pool she's drowning in while her two mother figures kick her back down (possibly with a snide comment that this'll be good for her).
I feel a lot of dissonance in Rose's apparent arc. If she's the one who initiates this, it's a Rose who actively acts to better understand herself. That's a change! A development from the Demise arc deconditioning! That fits in with a teenager struggling to find herself!
A Rose who has the same thing happen to her again - ... that's... what is this? Someone who started out as a victim and failure, who's had bad things happen to her, and then never learns or develops from these struggles so it just continues to happen again against her will. It feels like an arc of someone who's breaking down into despair. It feels like the arc of an anti-hero or nihilist (Nephandus, I suppose, in WOD).
A person struggling to define herself with a side order of hero needs to have some victories and success of her own. They have to
choose who they want to be, right? A never-ending string of losses and change forced upon her is ... not a compelling arc, and it's especially dismal in comparison to (almost) everyone else on our team who has been growing and overcoming their respective obstacles (and the one person who apparently hasn't changed at all character-wise had the standard 'became more badass' arc).