La Chanson de la Victoire (The Song of Victory): La Petite Arpenteuse (Non, SV, you are a General of France in the Napoleonic War!)

Parlez-vous français?

  • Oui, je parle très bien français!

    Votes: 161 14.2%
  • Un peu.

    Votes: 188 16.6%
  • What? Francis? Nope.

    Votes: 329 29.1%
  • What? Oh, don't be silly, my dear!

    Votes: 161 14.2%
  • ¿El español es lo suficientemente bueno?

    Votes: 86 7.6%
  • Ich verstehe dich irgendwie.

    Votes: 64 5.7%
  • Я очень хорошо говорю по-русски.

    Votes: 63 5.6%
  • 我听不懂。

    Votes: 35 3.1%
  • 何を言っているのですか?

    Votes: 28 2.5%
  • nuqneH pa'!

    Votes: 10 0.9%
  • فرانسه بلدنستم

    Votes: 7 0.6%

  • Total voters
    1,132
Oh that poor guy that went ahead of us to Egypt. No support is coming.

Other than that, rename army of the Orient Army of the East, send 20,000 soldiers back west to Paris, Then start marching across the borders to get the other nations while they are still on the backfoot.
 
Oh that poor guy that went ahead of us to Egypt. No support is coming.

Other than that, rename army of the Orient Army of the East, send 20,000 soldiers back west to Paris, Then start marching across the borders to get the other nations while they are still on the backfoot.
We should go personally against the Army of the North. Using our Legend to the greatest effect to try and convince them to join us.
 
Austria: 52

The Austrian Empire has joined the
Missing something here.
The Government of Great Britain, sensing weakness in it's continental rival in France, has sent diplomats all over europe
Period? Or capitalization.

Additionally, you only gave us the links to the rolls, and while that is fine, can we get the numbers instead? Thank you.

Thank you for writing up this update too!
 
Seriously, once the Peace Talks roll around, I really hope Britain and Austria get MASSIVE Penalties to their Rolls for them. Breaking their Agreements and Treaties this soon with no more justification then 'France looks weak right now, let's beat them up' should have VERY bad consequences.
If I was Great Britain, I would have jumped at this chance to attack France when it was weak and descending into Civil War. The basis of British policy at this time was to make sure that there was no continental rival that could threaten Great Britain. France in this timeline is becoming the continental rival that could threaten Britain, thus the British can't ignore France or (at the moment) leave it in peace.

Regarding whether the British will face bad consequences for breaking this treaty. It will depend. The last treaty was mostly the result of incompetent British diplomats. Honestly, the British gave a lot more to France than it should have. I imagine that the French were pretty shocked by how the British quickly rolled over. Even if France defeats all its continental rivals again in this War of the Second Coalition, Great Britain is more than capable of staying in the fight as long as it has its navy.
 
Hmm Prussia is probably in the best position from just not suffering as much from the last war. Actually didn't they break an agreement to not attack for amount of years or was that just for the general we beat? Anyway they lost but it wasn't bad as others.

Austria picked a bad time to take a bribe. Their troops are not in the best of spirits from losing the last war. They payed a big number of money already to France. Now with breaking the peace deal wouldn't surprise me if they aren't looked the best from the countries that aren't joining.

Russia is very far away and Alexander needs to clean house first which will take time. And man Russia was trying to make a deal with us that could of screwed us possibly on purpose. A low blow if you ask me.

Spain is.....not in the best state right now. Lost so much already money and men wise. So no idea what they were thinking.

Naples.....yeah they fucked up. Only thing I can think of why the King of Naples is doing this is thinking we already left, hoping the rest of Europe will do all the fight while recovering with the British money and just thinking he isn't worth it. Sadly for him though is Davout is about to make an example of him. Also probably thinking being on the "Winning" side will help his lose.

HRE States not completely sure what they bring to the table but probably joined because most of Europe joined with Prussia and Austria joined.

GB obviously want revenge and to get back on top. Probably will try destroying our ships at the least which we can't let happen. How far they are willing to join I'm not sure. Surprised they are just throwing money around when they are having a money crisis. Any good targets we can hit with Sicily under our control?

Can only imagine what the map will look like after this war is won. France will have the Netherlands and basically Italy under their control. Wouldn't surprise me if the rest of the little Italy states just decided to join the rest of Italy under France.
 
Last edited:
Austria picked a bad time to take a bribe. Their troops are not in the best of spirits from losing the last war. They payed a big number of money already to France. Now with breaking the peace deal wouldn't surprise me if they aren't looked the best from the countries that aren't joining.
Plus, as they probably bribed the Pope, well, they might not be getting a return on that investment, along with losing the Holy See.
 
Naples.....yeah they fucked up. Only thing I can think of why the King of Naples is doing this is thinking we already left, hoping the rest of Europe will do all the fight while recovering with the British money and just thinking he isn't worth it. Sadly for him though is Davout is about to make an example of him. Also probably thinking being on the "Winning" side will help his lose.
You know, I think we should invent an Award for this.

Behold, the Ferdinand-Award! Awarded solely for Rulers who rush into a risky Situation without giving it ANY real thought.
 
I'm wondering if it would be possible to entice other nations into seizing British holdings. Their heavy-handed policies haven't made them any real allies and the lose of their overseas colonies will cripple them. Their navy may be the best in the world, but it's also the most expensive and has the most territory to cover.

Possible takers:
America still believes it can entice Canada to join their union and are less than pleased at seeing their shipping seized by Britan and to add insult to injury, American crewmen are being forcefully conscripted into the British navy as well given that America still isn't recognized as an independent country in the eyes of Britain.

Russia: Has a lot of territory disputes with it's neighbors particularly Sweden. This could be used to convince them to turn on the coalition.
 
You know, I think we should invent an Award for this.

Behold, the Ferdinand-Award! Awarded solely for Rulers who rush into a risky Situation without giving it ANY real thought.

Yeah Ferdinand very much deserves that. Sadly he won't be around long enough to see it. Davout has our permission to do what he thinks he needs to on good old Naples. Ferd basically broke the treaty right away the moment he thought we were gone. Attacking Naples gets rid of an enemy behind us who could of caused trouble and help lift France's spirit up to fight better in the war.
 
Austria picked a bad time to take a bribe. Their troops are not in the best of spirits from losing the last war. They payed a big number of money already to France. Now with breaking the peace deal wouldn't surprise me if they aren't looked the best from the countries that aren't joining.
There is also the fact that all the soldiers captured by Brian had to promise no never attack France again, I believe. If those soldiers do participate it should allow us to get away with a harsh punishment to Austria.
HRE States not completely sure what they bring to the table but probably joined because most of Europe joined with Prussia and Austria joined.
IIRC they joined because Francis II of Austria is the current emperor of the HRE, in OTL the HRE was dissolved after the 3rd defeat in a row of Austria at the end of the War of the 3rd Coalition.
 
Russia: Has a lot of territory disputes with it's neighbors particularly Sweden. This could be used to convince them to turn on the coalition.

You mean turning Russia or getting Sweden on our side? Not feeling very trusting of Russia at this time. Russia might of just tried to offer a hand of friendship but pulled their hand back at the last second while having said hand going through their hair.

Edit: I don't think Sweden is even joining a side at this time. Neutral I think?

There is also the fact that all the soldiers captured by Brian had to promise no never attack France again, I believe. If those soldiers do participate it should allow us to get away with a harsh punishment to Austria.

IIRC they joined because Francis II of Austria is the current emperor of the HRE, in OTL the HRE was dissolved after the 3rd defeat in a row of Austria at the end of the War of the 3rd Coalition.

Yep. Those soldiers and generals made a promise to not attack France but it seems like they will try anyway.

Thanks for telling me about the HRE States.
 
Last edited:
Russia might of just tried to offer a hand of friendship but pulled their hand back at the last second while having said hand going through their hair.
The man who offered it did so in good faith. Said offer died with him as his successor has no obligation to adhere to it.

You mean turning Russia or getting Sweden on our side?
The former. Trust has little to do with this, while having them as an ally would be nice it's unlikely so I'll settle for having their armies pointed away from France and into the lands of our enemies. Finland, Poland, amount others should put them at odds with Prussia for awhile.
 
The man who offered it did so in good faith. Said offer died with him as his successor has no obligation to adhere to it.


The former. Trust has little to do with this, while having them as an ally would be nice it's unlikely so I'll settle for having their armies pointed away from France and into the lands of our enemies. Finland, Poland, amount others should put them at odds with Prussia for awhile.

Um didn't the guy work for Alexander and basically make the offer and then declare war on us? And how you know he did it in good faith?

I'd say trust is kinda important. Remember they are fighting with Austria and Prussia against us. How is Finland and Sweden our enemy? They are one of the few countries that haven't declared war on us.
 
The man who offered it did so in good faith. Said offer died with him as his successor has no obligation to adhere to it.
Alexander, who was the one who made the offer to us, was the successor. The father died, ending the civil war, and he's declared against us now that we can't benefit him with military aid. So personally I'd be open to seeing what might be made of Sweden, or if all else fails, their territories.
 
The thing with Prussia was just with (Sore Loser) Brunswick, and it t was only one year... back in 1793. It's now 1795. Also, Ferdinand basically has no army. The only unit he has that explicitly remains is his King's division, beaten by Kleber and Lucroy on the field outside Palermo, though it withdrew in good order. The 32k army from the Neapolitan side of the Strait of Messina was obliterated by Davout's reinforced II Corps. Ferd can raise a bunch of conscripts, but they'll have next to no training, his best unit was recently bested, and he's up against the same guy that rekt his army a few short months ago. Once Ferd is made an example of, Davout can swing back north to reinforce Massena in Northern Italy against the Austrians and HRE troops.

As for the situation in France, I'm not sure if it'd be better to make for the frontier to reinforce Jourdan on the Rhine (and we'll get to see him again, as our last convo with him the the blowup about the Egypt-India expedition) against the Prussians and HRE members, or make for Paris to 'restore order.' Even if Nappy and Brian are outnumbered, it's only about 5k men, mostly conscripts. On the flip side, the bro squad has a lot of veterans from the various campaigns, and they are plain better commanders than their Army of the North opponents.
 
Um didn't the guy work for Alexander and basically make the offer and then declare war on us? And how you know he did it in good faith?

I'd say trust is kinda important. Remember they are fighting with Austria and Prussia against us. How is Finland and Sweden our enemy? They are one of the few countries that haven't declared war on us.
You're right, I was confusing OTL with what's going on in-quest.
 
There is also the fact that all the soldiers captured by Brian had to promise no never attack France again, I believe. If those soldiers do participate it should allow us to get away with a harsh punishment to Austria.
Refuse to accept their surrender on the field of battle. Soldiers captured anyways sentenced to period at hard labor penal colonies for what seems appropriate(1 to 5 years perhaps). Captured generals we make an example out of with trial and either execute or thrown into prison and forgotten. I lean to execution.
 
Last edited:
As for the situation in France, I'm not sure if it'd be better to make for the frontier to reinforce Jourdan on the Rhine (and we'll get to see him again, as our last convo with him the the blowup about the Egypt-India expedition) against the Prussians and HRE members, or make for Paris to 'restore order.' Even if Nappy and Brian are outnumbered, it's only about 5k men, mostly conscripts. On the flip side, the bro squad has a lot of veterans from the various campaigns, and they are plain better commanders than their Army of the North opponents.
On the other hand, every Frenchman that dies to Robbie's insanity is a tragedy, and linking up with Napoleon and our bro would give them a staggering numerical advantage, which when combined with our sterling reputation among the French populace might convince the troops to surrender. Avoidable manpower losses are to be avoided and all that.

Jourdan's a good enough commander to hold the border together until we can swing around at the speartip of a reunified France. Especially since Austria and Prussia are likely to need months to mobilize.
 
On the other hand, every Frenchman that dies to Robbie's insanity is a tragedy, and linking up with Napoleon and our bro would give them a staggering numerical advantage, which when combined with our sterling reputation among the French populace might convince the troops to surrender. Avoidable manpower losses are to be avoided and all that.

Jourdan's a good enough commander to hold the border together until we can swing around at the speartip of a reunified France. Especially since Austria and Prussia are likely to need months to mobilize.

I'd say go and turn the Northern Recruits soon as possible. If we are able to turn them then Robespierre would only have Paris under his control. Which could have certain Ministers and soldiers to feel cornered and decided to turn on Robespierre. Which can end the Civil War sooner.
 
Refuse to accept their surrender on the field of battle. Soldiers captured anyways sentenced to period at hard labor penal colonies for what seems appropriate(1 to 5 years perhaps). Captured generals we make an example out of with trial and either execute or thrown into prison and forgotten. I lean to execution.
Are you crazy? Most of these opposing French soldiers are untrained conscripts. Punishing them for following orders is too extreme. Not to mention, a waste of manpower. The most famous generals are on the side of the restoration government. It should be relatively easy to gain their support through mercy and fair treatment. After all, the true enemies of France will soon be at the gates. Why punish these inexperienced and recently enlisted soldiers with hard labor and penal colony sentences. They can redeem themselves and prove themselves as being loyal to France by facing France's enemies on the field of battle. Then go home to their families.
 
Last edited:
Are you crazy? Most of these opposing French soldiers are untrained conscripts. Punishing them for following orders is too extreme. Not to mention, a waste of manpower. The most famous generals are on the side of the restoration government. It should be relatively easy to gain their support through mercy and fair treatment. After all, the true enemies of France will soon be at the gates. Why punish these inexperienced and recently enlisted soldiers with hard labor and penal colony sentences. They can redeem themselves and prove themselves as being loyal to France by facing France's enemies on the field of battle. Then go home to their families.
That was referring to Austrian soldiers, not French. More specifically, the ones who swore by treaty and their own honour to never again take up arms against France in exchange for being freed the last time Brian trounced them. Just FYI.
 
Are you crazy? Most of these opposing French soldiers are untrained conscripts. Punishing them for following orders is too extreme. Not to mention, a waste of manpower. The most famous generals are on the side of the restoration government. It should be relatively easy to gain their support through mercy and fair treatment. After all, the true enemies of France will soon be at the gates. Why punish these inexperienced and recently enlisted soldiers with hard labor and penal colony sentences. They can redeem themselves and prove themselves as being loyal to France by facing France's enemies on the field of battle. Then go home to their families.

That was referring to Austrian soldiers, not French. More specifically, the ones who swore by treaty and their own honour to never again take up arms against France in exchange for being freed the last time Brian trounced them. Just FYI.

Yeah basically. It's a much different matter for our own countrymen. Roberspierre is crazy, and forcing people into his radical actions at point of death. Austrian are under no such aegis, are violating very specific oaths they took not long ago. We simply can't pardon surrendered Austrian soldiers on the same terms as before, lest they see their was no cost to violating their oath and gaming things to do it.

Norms of war only hold true when there's teeth when they are violated.

Thinking of it, refusing surrender only encourages the soldiers to fight to the death which isn't good for our precarious position so might be counterproductive. So leaning to accepting surrender, not returning prisoners try to use their disregard for the treaty they signed to undermine all of their other diplomatic relationships try to get other nations to reassess how they treat them.

Hard Labor might get some benefit, but it might be unfair to particular soldiers who are conscripted as said. I am waffling a bit on Austria for soldiers who violated an oath they took as it seems theirs greater culpability there but I suppose there's a moral factor to consider there.
 
Last edited:
Are you crazy? Most of these opposing French soldiers are untrained conscripts. Punishing them for following orders is too extreme. Not to mention, a waste of manpower. The most famous generals are on the side of the restoration government. It should be relatively easy to gain their support through mercy and fair treatment. After all, the true enemies of France will soon be at the gates. Why punish these inexperienced and recently enlisted soldiers with hard labor and penal colony sentences. They can redeem themselves and prove themselves as being loyal to France by facing France's enemies on the field of battle. Then go home to their families.
Yeah basically. It's a much different matter for our own countrymen. Roberspierre is crazy, and forcing people into his radical actions at point of death. Austrian are under no such aegis, are violating very specific oaths they took not long ago. We simply can't pardon surrendered Austrian soldiers on the same terms as before, lest they see their was no cost to violating their oath and gaming things to do it.

Norms of war only hold true when there's teeth when they are violated.
Exactly. We showed our troops that looting and butchering fleeing troops and innocent civilians for a post-facto justification of terror tactics is not and will never be acceptable. Now we must show the holdovers of a tyrannical age that the false notion of chivalry they invented to justify their authority is a weapon that can be turned against the wielder.

And that's kinda my personal take on how to punish the involved soldiers and officers who were still under treaty obligations: death is quick. Starvation and life imprisonments is gratuitous in its excess. A far fairer, if more horrible in its own way, is to have them all get the Colonel Runaway treatment: Every man will be branded on the right hand, so that all will know their oaths are without merit.
 
okay everyone, 12 hour shift in the shop is done, lets see what you-

OH MY GOODNESS!

Here we go.

Relevant question, no one really knew Theresa was safeguarding the two Royals prior to this did they? Because as favorable of the Royalists will be towards Napoleon, finding out Theresa was keeping them safe all this time and arrive like the proverbial hand of god to drop the hammer on the radical parisians will have her seem like an angel bit her to move.
Only ten people knew Therese cared for the royals when they first joined us that were not their former gurdians. Napoleon, Brian, Robespierre, Saint-Just are the only ones prior to our campaign to still be alive. The rest were executed by Brian after his first coup after those men were found guilty.

We've been rather quiet on that front, and our generals know, but only that they are kids we hired. That story did not stick after awhile, but no one really bothered to ask if it was them.

They didn't know they were prince and princess until we were well underway.
Holy shit the Royalists will lose their goddamn mind at this.
They have lost their god damn minds. They think the Pope has basically removed the Burbon's right to rule over France by Making Louis Excommunicated.

And that means that they realized that the Kings or Frane were not divine rulers, but men and women who were just as burdened as they were... and that made them think of one thing.

A child raised to rule a kingdom is far better than a man who took power by force.

Basically, they want to groom Louis into being a capable administrator... or even Auralious' and Plato's Philosopher King mold.
This is probably going to single handedly move France to have its own church like the Church of England after this. Also this is fodder for nationalist spirit that "the heir would risk his immortal soul for the brave soldiers of france."
Louis just wants his friends and brothers in arms to have their souls go to heaven, and is not taking the Pope's Shit for anything.

He even invoked his Royal title (which he hates with a burning passion by the way) to try and intimidate the man.

It didn't work, but he is totally willing to do a lot of things he hates for his friends and allies.
Right this degree of perfidy is not to be underestimated. This is the sort of thing which means you can't negotiate ANYTHING in good faith, because there is no faith to be had. At this point no treaty with Britain can be trusted going forward and is dubious. Britain his mortgaged their honor with this betrayal of the peace negotiations. This is the sort of thing that in a war you refuse to accept a ceasefire because you don't trust the other wise to not use it for personal advantage, and the war ends with complete unconditional surrender or total degredation of the enemies ability to continue fighting.
The thing about this situation is... they did something like this IRL... for the entire Revolutionary war/ Napoleonic Era.

Also about Britain's perfidy is twofold.

And honor has nothing to do with it, because they had no honor, to begin with. They in fact are breaking a treaty that they consider blatantly illegal and should not have been legally binding.

The diplomats who made those mistakes are dead, and arguably committed treason towards the nation by creating such a treaty that violates a whole lot of shit. Like seriously, Pitt resigned in disgrace, and he took his entire government down with him, and it cost GB shit that should have never been on the table in the first place.

Two, in England, the PM Burke decried the treaty immediately after he was elected, saying he would force it to change or there would be war.

The civil war happened before any negotiations could take place.

So they decided to assert dominance onto France while they were down.
FUCK FUCK. Right at this point everything I said about needing to make Britain regret this? On Super Steroids because without clever deployments from us it might well work which will encourage them to do it again even if we scrape by a narrow win. Only a harsh peace will work. I'm reconsidering the idea of some tactics I don't typically consider like Balkanizing Britain if we win, Ireland and Scotland independent at minimum, and maybe we can pry out whales into something independent too. Other forms of wrecking the British economy are now in play too.
That is going to be impossible unless you can find a way to beat the Royal Navy.

And that is near impossible.

The most you can get out of them is by taking away ships and money from them, and making more of their overseas colonies revolt or get lost. India being a prime target, but one that will be next to impossible to change unless you do fucking miracles.

Now that I've said that, we're going to have a few chances.
Yeah Europe you fucked up. Especially you Naples. And man Russia way to turn on us the moment you could or were they planning to screw us over from the beginning?
Well the situation in Russia changed rapidally.

So rapidally, I belive that Alexander is trying to use his membership in the coalition to get funds to buy people off.
Spitballing some ideas for making Britain regretting this, but for one I'd like to carve out a port in Britain or island chain we can fortify to make future invasion easier, maybe shenanigans like demolishing London or forcibly making them relocate the capital, and empowering a different noble clan to ruling the UK. If we want to play a tactic the UK likes to do of putting minority groups in power who without foreign support they'd collapse(and be ripped apart by those we rule over). I think the UK would be much better with a Scottish monarch wouldn't you say?
INB4 we take the Isle of Man, Ireland, or Wright's Island.
Narrator: Napoleon was in tough spot and things were looking dark for France...

Therese: Hello, Napoleon I brought 50,000 troops ready to march. The other half is still in Italy having finished a talk with a Pope, their ready to crush Naples before they can join he war and move on Austria the moment they get orders.

Royalist: By the way we are joining you since the freaking Pope is a moron and Therese has at least been keeping the Royal heirs safe.

Napoleon: *Loins Combust* How do you get more incredible every single time I see you?

Therese: Aw stop!
Accurate.
99 years lease on the Wight Island?
SOON tm
Things are going pear shaped
You mean they haven't already? :V
If I was Great Britain, I would have jumped at this chance to attack France when it was weak and descending into Civil War. The basis of British policy at this time was to make sure that there was no continental rival that could threaten Great Britain. France in this timeline is becoming the continental rival that could threaten Britain, thus the British can't ignore France or (at the moment) leave it in peace.
I mean, this is Britain's Entire Forign policy for over 100 years at this point...

They are about to learn that trying it on a nation that hates them is a very bad idea.

Like, we are the Super Power of this World Idea.
Regarding whether the British will face bad consequences for breaking this treaty. It will depend. The last treaty was mostly the result of incompetent British diplomats. Honestly, the British gave a lot more to France than it should have. I imagine that the French were pretty shocked by how the British quickly rolled over. Even if France defeats all its continental rivals again in this War of the Second Coalition, Great Britain is more than capable of staying in the fight as long as it has its navy.
Indeed.

While Britiania Rules the Waves, Britain is untouchable and can do anything it wants.

you think I'm joking, but I'm not.
Austria picked a bad time to take a bribe. Their troops are not in the best of spirits from losing the last war. They payed a big number of money already to France. Now with breaking the peace deal wouldn't surprise me if they aren't looked the best from the countries that aren't joining.
The thing is, they swore their oaths to the French Republic.

Not to the Restoration Authority, so there is a loophole...

But yeah, oathbreakers.
Russia is very far away and Alexander needs to clean house first which will take time. And man Russia was trying to make a deal with us that could of screwed us possibly on purpose. A low blow if you ask me.
At least we're not marching across Europe in the Middle of Winter.
Spain is.....not in the best state right now. Lost so much already money and men wise. So no idea what they were thinking.
THey didnt' fight in the first coalition.

So they have only lost money and presige.
Naples.....yeah they fucked up. Only thing I can think of why the King of Naples is doing this is thinking we already left, hoping the rest of Europe will do all the fight while recovering with the British money and just thinking he isn't worth it. Sadly for him though is Davout is about to make an example of him. Also probably thinking being on the "Winning" side will help his lose.
DAvout: In all honesty, this a waste of time, but I'll do it anyway for Louis.
HRE States not completely sure what they bring to the table but probably joined because most of Europe joined with Prussia and Austria joined.
Francis is the Emperor, he called them in.
GB obviously want revenge and to get back on top. Probably will try destroying our ships at the least which we can't let happen. How far they are willing to join I'm not sure. Surprised they are just throwing money around when they are having a money crisis. Any good targets we can hit with Sicily under our control?
One. Gibralter.

As for their money Crisis, that was resolved due to the Bank of England's financial wizardry.
Can only imagine what the map will look like after this war is won. France will have the Netherlands and basically Italy under their control. Wouldn't surprise me if the rest of the little Italy states just decided to join the rest of Italy under France.
Charlemagne Eat your heart out!
Edit: I don't think Sweden is even joining a side at this time. Neutral I think?
They are at peace with us.
Alexander, who was the one who made the offer to us, was the successor. The father died, ending the civil war, and he's declared against us now that we can't benefit him with military aid. So personally I'd be open to seeing what might be made of Sweden, or if all else fails, their territories.
Alexander's situation changed from being on the ropes to control all of Russia in less then a year.

Trying to make friends with the rest of Europe is something that he is doing to secure his power. Fighting France, even though he just asked for help from them? Hey it's just politics to him.
Refuse to accept their surrender on the field of battle. Soldiers captured anyways sentenced to period at hard labor penal colonies for what seems appropriate(1 to 5 years perhaps). Captured generals we make an example out of with trial and either execute or thrown into prison and forgotten. I lean to execution.
I would argue being someone who pushed for the laws of war to be followed might make us even better looking in the Eyes of Europe.

Whereas everyone else is being traitors and oath breakers, its the upstart french, people who should, by all means, disobey these self-same rules, that follow them.

It will make other powers realize what they are dealing with... and who is actually benefiting from this unjust and horrifying war.
On the other hand, every Frenchman that dies to Robbie's insanity is a tragedy, and linking up with Napoleon and our bro would give them a staggering numerical advantage, which when combined with our sterling reputation among the French populace might convince the troops to surrender. Avoidable manpower losses are to be avoided and all that.
Lets just say that due to a combination of the Vendee being brought down early, the Terror not starting on schedule, demobilization, remobilization, and a year or two of peace?

There are more Frenchmen alive now then there were in 1795 in OTL.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top