Some of the Voters seems to have appeared only to Vote to no tell, maybe some did not read the GM post.
[Badfic Intensifies]Damn. I just realized... we would. We'd be so inured in the way of thinking that we'd see Dumbledore putting us with the Dursleys as a sign that even when we were a baby we were so freakish that even this old man saw it, and put us where he thought we deserved to go because of our freakishness. And as such, since he obviously had the authority to do so, we'd have to tell him about our Gamer ability so that he could determine what our punishment for being an even bigger freak than the rest of our kind, is. Well, @Halpo133 if the choice to tell Dumbledore about our ability wins, remember that title change to freak, and that our character asks Dumbledore what our punishment for being an even bigger freak than normal freaks usually are, is. Because that is the only reason I can think of to justify us telling Dumbledore jack and/or shit.
In which case Dumbledore is a dick to expect Harry to reveal his most important secret to a guy he does not know at all and has a very neutral (10/30 infact! ) relationship. Harry does not know Dumbledore IC yet, and has no reason to believe he is a good man IC. Why should he? Harry does not KNOW Dumbledore at all. Dumbledore is basically a total stranger to Harry.
As for the idea that this is a test. Personally I think these kinds of tests (especially considering that again, the two don't know each other at ALL) feel more like the kind of things the fanon!evil!manipulative!Dumbledore would use. I could maybe buy it if this was something like 3rd+ year Harry and if there had been other signs to make Dumbledore worry. But we are talking about Harry who is meeting Dumbledore to the 2nd time (first time in private), and has not even officially started school yet.
If Dumbledore does know, and his first assumption upon Harry not revealing his deepest secrets to a total stranger on their 2nd meeting is: "Harry is obviously untrustworthy!", then screw him. Thankfully, we have a sane Dumbledore so I don't see that happening.
How long is it before school starts btw? How much time do we still have to grind Harrys stats?
I'm going to post something that i read in another forum about Dumbledore so people can understand him a little more:
I feel that Dumbledore is very much misunderstood, mainly because people insist on trying to pigeon-hole him into one of two camps: perfect or evil. In reality, Dumbledore can only be understood as being the result of two conflicting desires which form the root of his character.
On the one hand, he does not trust himself with power. He hates Grindelwald's philosophy of the Greater Good and would rather remove himself completely from all political concerns. This side of him would have him treat Harry as a regular kid, albeit one he favours, and values Harry's life over winning the war.
On the other hand, despite his attempts to avoid it, he inevitably ends up holding a huge amount of power, by virtue of his intelligence and magical skill. Magical ability in the HP world is important, and when you have it in the extreme people will look to you for guidance. The conflict with Voldemort forces him reluctantly into a position of leadership, because to stand aside would be to allow great evil to occur. This side of him would have him treat Harry as a weapon to defeat Voldemort, and values winning the war over Harry's life.
In applying these two root beliefs, I would suggest that Dumbledore's instinct is the first, but when circumstances grow desperate the second can overrule it. On top of these core attributes, Dumbledore has a number of other beliefs. Among them are:
He values Harry's life over his happiness.
He places high value on freedom of choice.
With these four beliefs and attitudes in mind, I think everything Dumbledore does can be understood. Essentially he's continually compromising, and that balancing act is where he most often opens himself to criticism: sometimes the compromise can be said to be overly cautious, other times it's not cautious enough. Though this is often only clear with hindsight.
For example, some people say Dumbledore should have prepared Harry better, telling him more information and training him to fight. This would fall into the "Greater Good" category: training a child soldier is very much not okay. It would be an immoral act to win the war. So while Dumbledore no doubt considered it, he can't bring himself to do it.
On the other end of the spectrum, some people say Dumbledore should have placed Harry with a wizarding family who would have treated him well, like the Weasleys. But this goes against the ultimate priority of keeping Harry alive, because the Dursley household was the only place he could be sure Harry would be completely safe (as demonstrated by what happened to the Longbottoms days later).
(Also, it's heavily implied* that the Bond of Blood requires the Dursleys' freedom of choice and so Dumbledore cannot apply pressure for them to treat Harry in a certain way. Forcing them to treat Harry well would mean the Bond of Blood would break.)
We can also see the fine line Dumbledore walked in PS. He allowed Harry to learn about the Philosopher's Stone and the Mirror of Erised, and even hints that Harry might come across it again. He gives him the invisibility cloak to aid him. However, he never forces Harry into wandering the halls of Hogwarts at night (whereupon he found the Mirror), nor does he force Harry to go after the stone. Harry chose to do both of those things. In doing so Dumbledore simultaneously tested and prepared Harry, in line with his second core attribute, but at the same time respected Harry's ability to choose (which derives from his care for Harry). Harry could equally have chosen to hide in his dorm, as 99% of children would have done.
I could go on, but I think these are sufficient examples for now.
What I find most interesting about this is that different people criticise Dumbledore from different angles. Some people criticise him for treating Harry too much like a child, others criticise him for not treating Harry like a child enough. Hell, sometimes one person will simultaneously criticise Dumbledore for both at once, which just goes to show what a difficult position he was in. Essentially, both motivations are valid. Dumbledore knows this, and that's why balancing them and reaching a compromise is so hard. No matter what compromise you arrive at, the result will be unsatisfactory, because the situation overall is shitty.
And about first year and the protections of the stone have this:
It's not that hard to figure out a possible reason Dumbledore could have had for protecting the Stone with relatively simple challenges rather than locking it in an adamantine case and dropping it in a volcano.
Dumbledore likes puzzles. He is a thinking man.
So, he has his colleagues contribute to the Stone's protections. You go from a big dog to a killer-plant, to flying keys, to a chess game, to a mountain troll, to a logic puzzle. All fun and games, right? Lulls you right into thinking what Dumbledore wants to you to think.
"This is easy, what was the old prune thinking?"
And then you hit a brick wall.
Why would you be looking for the Stone in first place? Because you want the Elixir of Life and mountains of gold, you greedy fucker. You can stare at that mirror for hours, days, years on end and the Stone will remain just as far out of your reach as it was the moment you entered the dungeon, because the truth is, Dumbledore is smarter than you and he was ahead of you every step of the way.
If Harry hadn't got himself and his friends involved, Dumbledore could've kicked back on a lawn chair on a tropical beach somewhere, sipping margaritas, not giving a single fuck, because Voldemort couldn't comprehend the solution to what is, in my opinion, the greatest puzzle in the whole series.
Some of the Voters seems to have appeared only to Vote to no tell, maybe some did not read the GM post.
While you make some good points this still does not address the issue of Dumbledore watching Harry more carefully for his own good. One does not have to believe a child is inherently untrustworthy too keep a better watch on him for his own safety.
You are assuming that people are voting not to tell him because they thing "dumbledoor is evil" (as the typical joke on list based humor sites goes)I'm going to post something that i read in another forum about Dumbledore so people can understand him a little more
You are assuming that people are voting not to tell him because they thing "dumbledoor is evil" (as the typical joke on list based humor sites goes)
But the reason I voted not to tell him is not because I don't understand him, I think we should tell him. But in character harry has no reason to trust him yet. I want to have a coherent story where dumbledoor earns our trust and thus our secret, rather than telling him purely based on OOC knowledge
Dumbledore value freedom of choice? I don't think so.
He maybe value choice but not more than security,and what is society that put security more than freedom of individual?Tyranny.
Harry try to use choice everytime that he want to stayaway form Dursley that is his "choice".
Pettunia and Vernon don't want Harry in their house,that also their "choice".
But Dumbledore convince them to stay together anyway.
For the greater good is fanon,young Dumbledore come up with it and regret later but core of his being stay the same.He is great like everyone think of him but not enough to do everything at the same time.
I don't said about being monster,Dumbledore has good intention at heart.
That why I alway see him as very talent Percy.
1. by placing us with the dursleys, this is actually a strike against him1. To the best of our knowledge, he's done nothing but protect us. Want to see what happens to us if he doesn't? Look at the Longbottoms.
2. He's the best wizard of the 20th century and may know how the hell we got this new power. (Remember, if you guys want to bring up IC knowledge, Harry doesn't know that being The Gamer is something very unique and would be naturally curious as to whether someone else out there has the same powers as him. Who better to ask then the greatest mind of the wizarding world?)
3. From all accounts Harry has of Dumbledore, (Harry has certainly come across references to Dumbledore in his books) Dumbledore has a sterling reputation.
4. If we were to ask Moody, the guy we already trusted, he would undoubtedly agree to tell Dumbledore. If I recall cannon correctly, Moody had the highest regards for Dumbledore.
5. We are going to his school and there is a good chance he'd find out anyways.
1. by placing us with the dursleys, this is actually a strike against him
2. what does it matter how we got it? and being awesomely powerful is actually a reason to fear him not trust him
3. harry is a muggle raised kid who has nearly zero info about wizard society. he knows nothing about dumbledoors reputation
4. we didn't ask, and he didn't suggest it, and so far in the meeting it looked like he wanted to hide it. We can ask him after the meeting and then go by his suggestion (because we can always tell dumbledor later, we can't untell him)
5. assuming a disturbing amount of surveillance on the students, and us being indiscreet
1. Who else was he going to place us with? The Longbottoms were skilled Aurors and they got wrecked. You want a safe Harry or dead Harry?
2. Harry gets a new power he doesn't know the limits of. Maybe someone in the wizard world knows something more about his powers. OOC, we know that's not true but IC, Harry would probably want to find out more. Why should we fear Dumbledore if we are awesomely powerful? Again, he's done nothing but protect us to the best of our knowledge.
3. Harry has to have read a few wizarding books by now. (Didn't we vote on a few?) He has to have come across Dumbledore by now.
You explorations reveal books for all the years at Hogwarts, a collection of books on household charms, history books, potions books, and more. And then your eyes fall on something absolutely horrifying.
The Harry Potter section.
Harry Potter and the Naughty Nundu
Harry Potter and the Angry Acromantula
Harry Potter and the Dastardly Dragon
Harry Potter and...
5. Dumbledore fights wizards like Wizard Hitler and Voldemort on a day to day basis. An eleven year old kid isn't fooling him.
This may be a test, but if Dumbledore is fishing, I think he's wise enough to understand why Harry may not be ready to talk. It's not like the same situation (Harry clamming up) hasn't happened in canon, after all. ("I must ask you, Harry, whether there is anything you'd like to tell me," [Dumbledore] said gently. "Anything at all.")Or it is a test by Dumbledore and not telling him will just make him trust Harry less and watch him more carefully. Choices in quests can be unambiguously bad too.
Did the GM say they prefer more substantial posts? Just wondering, since I jumped in fairly recently.Some of the Voters seems to have appeared only to Vote to no tell, maybe some did not read the GM post.
I think Harry can tell the difference between A History of Magic and Harry Potter and the Naughty Nundu...Probably, but he has also discovered wizarding books about himself.
Makes propaganda about Dumbledore more suspect.
[Badfic Intensifies]
How long has it been since you read the canon, just out of curiosity?
Did the GM say they prefer more substantial posts? Just wondering, since I jumped in fairly recently.
*puffs up happily* "It is a rather spiffing hat, isn't it, my dear boy?"
True. As for the people saying he was one of the good guys, whats your explanation for the decade of favoring Slytherin over the others no matter what they did and basically destroying one of the subjects for everyone else? What exactly did he do for Dumbledore during that time that made such a thing worth it?He is less likely to share anything while operating under the impression that we are an (extra)ordinary wizard.
If we share information about the Gamer powers, he will lose the primary motivation of allowing us a childhood unburded by greater concerns. If we don't share, he has no reason to change.