The Power(Harry Potter/The Gamer)

[BABY DARK LORD TRAIT ACQUIRED]


It won't kill them, but it might physically damage them in the same way that it damages generic materials. Dementors are classified as nonbeings. They're not alive, or dead, and they can't in fact be killed. They're basically a naturally occurring phenomenon.

So we can, what, landscape them into oblivion?

Otherwise, not being alive nor dead and being unkillabe sounds like they are undead, would it take damage from a Heals and Smites (and other anti-undead and/or anti-evil stuff, they hate sunlight too right?).

[X] Meet with Dumbledore first.

[X] Mirror Image
[X] ESP
 
The relative stuff within isn't necessarily classified as magic anyways - it's psychic abilities rather than any kind of magical spells. Space magic, sure, but not technically regarded as magic.
Well Fantasy magics are magics though meh, I'd caution against WH stuffs due to the attention of KAOS whenever you use Warp-thing
 
[X] Meet with Dumbledore first.

[X] Stinking Cloud
[X] Mirror Image


We should probably express an interest in learning healing and never mention the flobber worm experiments. Best way to get at the pheonix and a hospital internship for all the rep gains and faith boosthing. We can do that and Monster hunter. Eventually we'll hit wish or miracle and save neville parents and the rest of the longterm spell damage ward.
 
Otherwise, not being alive nor dead and being unkillabe sounds like they are undead, would it take damage from a Heals and Smites (and other anti-undead and/or anti-evil stuff, they hate sunlight too right?).
I don't think they hate sunlight, no. As to any damage they might take... It really depends on how @Halpo133 plays it. Canon doesn't show any indication that they can be damaged, merely contained physically, or herded with the Patronus Charm, and trying to fit them into D&D style classifications seems like an exercise in futility because they're not D&D creatures.
 
I'm pretty sure Halpo has said we aren't getting Wish. Too OP. Don't know what Miracle is, but if it's the Religous version of Wish, then it's probably a no go.

Never said that. I said that Wish would have limitations, and the wish granter would be literal. And probably lazy. Doing the easiest thing to grant exactly what you ask for.
 
Never said that. I said that Wish would have limitations, and the wish granter would be literal. And probably lazy. Doing the easiest thing to grant exactly what you ask for.
Ah. Well, if multiple wishes are a thing, that makes the literal part rather easy to deal with.
"I wish that you grant any and all wishes in the manner the wisher intended, and not any other possible interpretation."
 
I'm pretty sure Halpo has said we aren't getting Wish. Too OP. Don't know what Miracle is, but if it's the Religous version of Wish, then it's probably a no go.
actually Miracle is much safer as your deity personally grants it, meaning that it must be in theme for your deity but that it won't have as much unexpected results.
 
It is implied in D&D that Wish is a very temperamental and hard to control spell (mostly so GMs can actually run quests including 9th level Wizards)
I know that D&D wishes aren't ominipotent and if you try to do to much they may work partialy or not work at all , what I don't understand is how we can be vunerable to jerkass/literal genie when we are the one casting the wish
 
I said that Wish would have limitations, and the wish granter would be literal. And probably lazy.
The GM did not mention malevolent intent just taking the path of least resistance which is something many forces in nature do.
I mostly included jerkass because it is a sister trope to literal , which the GM did mention and is the part I dont get , path of least resistance makes perfect sense, literal genie when we are the caster don't
 
Back
Top