- Location
- US
- Pronouns
- He/Him
We have -Rosen caught out as a killing role that lied about visiting Shadell last night. We should be lynching him today.
I'm fine either way on this, but if Rosen lives I can stop a nightkill tonight without the risk of blocking Town instead.We have -Rosen caught out as a killing role that lied about visiting Shadell last night. We should be lynching him today.
That presumes that you are telling the truth about being a roleblocker which I am uncertain of, that you are right about how the set up works, which I also doubt, and that you are actually going to do what is in town's best interest.I'm fine either way on this, but if Rosen lives I can stop a nightkill tonight without the risk of blocking Town instead.
If we lynch Rosen and he's not the Serial Killer we won't know who will be doing the kills at all.
I'm fine either way on this, but if Rosen lives I can stop a nightkill tonight without the risk of blocking Town instead.
If we lynch Rosen and he's not the Serial Killer we won't know who will be doing the kills at all.
There are definitely other scum to uncover. But one fewer scum alive and voting is better. Also one fewer players contributing to the scum chat and to coordinate plays.This is a fair point. I'm of the opinion that we should not lynch -Rosen for the time being in case there are other scum to uncover.
That presumes that you are telling the truth about being a roleblocker which I am uncertain of, that you are right about how the set up works, which I also doubt, and that you are actually going to do what is in town's best interest.
Also, I will note that a gunsmith isn't going to detect a backup killer unless the front-up killer is already dead
I didn't vote before to prevent ending the day, so I don't know where you're getting that from. I don't want to see the say end with us voting someone who isn't confirmed scum when we have confirmed scum.I mean barring a counter-claim we could very well mark nictis as the roleblocker. Also You're giving me the impression you want day to end early. I agree with a Rosen lynch however I want more discussion and input from lurkers.
And while we're here can you or anyone give me a reason I'm scum beyond me refusing to view wincon hinting as a valid scumhunt strategy and unwilling to "prove" myself with it. Because if you can't then expect a half-assed and pissed off defense in return.
ItzNarcotic has already verified that he was roleblocked and I roleblocked him.That presumes that you are telling the truth about being a roleblocker which I am uncertain of, that you are right about how the set up works, which I also doubt, and that you are actually going to do what is in town's best interest.
Not lynching scum because a third party player promises to RB them and has a theory about how the scum team works just doesn't fly. We should lynch -Rosen today. Probably Cyricubed Day 3 and hope we can nail down the SK in the mean time.
Fair point, but as a counterpoint the Gunsmith is a lot more likely to die in the near future if the kill is let loose, and then it doesn't matter.Also, I will note that a gunsmith isn't going to detect a backup killer unless the front-up killer is already dead.
Except that that alone is not a bad mechanic, is actually a really common one, and wasn't the problem in that setup.Here's another thing, and it pushes further for not skipping over -rosen lynch.
Yes, IJW's first game had it so only a single mafia scum could kill and it was inherited. Frankly that game wasn't designed good, both to IJW's inexperience in designing plus having an actually scummy person as his second. I would like to believe IJW learned from that experience and didn't design scum that way. Relying on a repeated mechanic like that turns me away from planning for such.
Okay?Sorry, forgot to address Nictis' claim. A town roleblocker would probably not claim for the very obvious reason of not wanting to be a target. But even if Nictis is a roleblocker, we have nothing to confirm him as a town roleblocker. I am still pretty dubious about the "control group" idea.
Let me clarify why I don't see it as relevant then.Wait, you don't see the relevance? I feel like it's pretty obvious.
Meso is saying that your claim is unlikely (though I disagree on that point I think)
and that even if you are a roleblocker you may well not have our best interests in mind.
This is directly relevant to whether or not we should follow your direction.
Like... Let's say that I don't have your best interests in mind. (I don't, they just align with mine)Wait, you don't see the relevance? I feel like it's pretty obvious.
Meso is saying that your claim is unlikely (though I disagree on that point I think)
and that even if you are a roleblocker you may well not have our best interests in mind.
This is directly relevant to whether or not we should follow your direction.
ItzNarcotic claimed to have been roleblocked, then you claimed to be the one who did it. That doesn't prove anything. You might be a roleblocker, you might not. You might be on the same side as town, you might not. You are presuming you know the set up, but you might be wrong.ItzNarcotic has already verified that he was roleblocked and I roleblocked him.
The setup thoughts is based on a couple things, Shadell being an Experimental Gunsmith and that being how it worked in IJW's last game being the main factors.
And me not acting in Town's interest here is very easily caught by anyone else claiming to be blocked, or both of the known kills continuing.
Lynching Rosen here allows scum to pick someone to die tonight, someone who is definitely going to be Town, and you're saying that's preferable to what might be a mislynch but is likely to be killing scum?
Not sure I really buy it Meso
Fair point, but as a counterpoint the Gunsmith is a lot more likely to die in the near future if the kill is let loose, and then it doesn't matter.
Except that that alone is not a bad mechanic, is actually a really common one, and wasn't the problem in that setup.
Okay?
I don't see the relevance.
Worst case, we get the two deaths we'd have gotten anyway, confirm Rosen is *not* a killing role, and maybe lynch Nictis if it comes out that they didn't RB Rosen as promised. I'm like 90% sure the Test Subjects will have to kill Nictis anyway to win, so...eh. I'm fine with whatever outcome comes.
Shadell. Read between the lines, I cannot get more specific about this. This. Is. Paraphrasing.Per Nictis' descriptions up till now, control group wins by either living to the end or just when the game ends. The latter is incredibly suspect, which kinda makes me suspect the whole role, particularly when Nictis paraphrases the same exact way each time, but won't give us the actual details (and no one else is claiming control group).
Paraphrasing shouldn't have any impact on your specificity unless you actually don't understand your role. This seems like an excuse for your continued vagueness. "Control Group Roleblocker" really sounds like their should be other members of this control group. But there aren't. Your win condition doesn't make any sense, and you are fighting really hard to not lynch scum while promising to do something none of us can possibly confirm.Shadell. Read between the lines, I cannot get more specific about this. This. Is. Paraphrasing.