Banishment using his True Name in a ritual is likely beyond our knowledge. Using his Name to make banishing him with violence easier, and extending the period of banishment, likely requires only saying the name, and then applying enough violence. While fairly simple, that doesn't necessarily mean easy. As an example, Ghargatuloth's Name took fifteen minutes to say, isn't exactly designed for human mouths, and getting even a single syllable wrong renders it useless.Could soneone explain how doable and hard the nessecary ritual would be to use his true name to banish him?
YaySince there's some controversy and new information on this matter, can I get a straw poll of yay or nay on the matter of divining Turoq's True Name?
Ridcully is not allowed at gambling tables.I wonder if Ridcully or Rotbart should get the gambler trait...
Since there's some controversy and new information on this matter, can I get a straw poll of yay or nay on the matter of divining Turoq's True Name?
Nay. Turoq's Truename doesn't offer sufficient benefit for the opportunity cost and risks involved.Since there's some controversy and new information on this matter, can I get a straw poll of yay or nay on the matter of divining Turoq's True Name?
It depends, when the someone is a deacon prince of tzeench with a talent for making hero's fall by talking to them and many similarities to the diviner, even Ridcully has a single digit percentage chance of falling. Main reason I am speaking up here is that Ridcully would know this and I get the i,pression that people are viewing the action as safe
On the other hand, it would be incredibly epic if Ridcully did actually fall.It depends, when the someone is a deacon prince of tzeench with a talent for making hero's fall by talking to them and many similarities to the diviner, even Ridcully has a single digit percentage chance of falling. Main reason I am speaking up here is that Ridcully would know this and I get the i,pression that people are viewing the action as safe
It depends, when the someone is a deacon prince of tzeench with a talent for making hero's fall by talking to them and many similarities to the diviner, even Ridcully has a single digit percentage chance of falling. Main reason I am speaking up here is that Ridcully would know this and I get the i,pression that people are viewing the action as safe
Whoops you are right, missed his Avernite trait getting updated.
It depends, when the someone is a deacon prince of tzeench with a talent for making hero's fall by talking to them and many similarities to the diviner, even Ridcully has a single digit percentage chance of falling. Main reason I am speaking up here is that Ridcully would know this and I get the i,pression that people are viewing the action as safe
It is single digit, more then 1 less then 10. Well the chance of falling is, the chance of just not succeeding is higher@Durin
Point of clarification: does this mean that the chance of failure is single digit, or at least single digit?
Pretty much which is why I spoke up. I try not to let you wander into traps that you should know about withou a warning.I think it's mainly that players don't have the same understanding of the risks that you as the QM do.
Question - what are Ridcully's thoughts on the idea of divining Turoq's True Name?
This is before or after the re-roll?It is single digit, more then 1 less then 10. Well the chance of falling is, the chance of just not succeeding is higher
It doesn't seem like the sort of thing that can be rerolled.