Might as well trade it for technomancy, we get something and they get the far better end of the deal.Can we propose a vote what to do with the Advanced Terminator Armor?
That Deagons Nest should have it is hopefully unamious but the question is if we trade it or if we gift it.
mmm I'd rather get it done now to follow on from Surt's proposal.
I have to wonder why they're opposing.The conservatives already look like they may be a bit salty about the notion since they're opposing - sometimes it's best to take things in steps.
Can we propose a vote what to do with the Advanced Terminator Armor?
That Deagons Nest should have it is hopefully unamious but the question is if we trade it or if we gift it.
Seems more like Scott or the Trust diplomat's job, not ours.Might as well trade it for technomancy, we get something and they get the far better end of the deal.
1. it seems to be not wanting to lose any influenceI have to wonder why they're opposing.
Still I guess it'd be a good idea to just table it, but ask for a vote fairly soon as it's potentially a more immediate issue than Garps.
@Durin
1. Why is are Vanahiem and Aflehiem opposing Surt's proposal? The main reason I can think of it that they're afraid of a lack of centralisation right now.
2. Would a bank proposition be considered out of place at the moment?
Seems more like Scott or the Trust diplomat's job, not ours.
HISSSSSSSS, angry cat noises.
kk.
This at the very least has to happen, I do not want the Trust to disintegrate because of a banking crisis.We could just shelve the banking issue but if we do I'd like to suggest to the High Council that they should considers the future of the bank and prepare possible options for the next High Council meeting.
1. no indication@Durin
1. Why is the inquisition opposing the high council's seat proposal? If they gave us any indication that is.
2. Would the psykers just casually joss my world tree/treeway hunch as inconsistent with everything they can detect or is it the kind of thing that would require a lot more study to give an indication one way or another?
I'm sorry I'm afraid I've forgotten your world tree hunch?2. Would the psykers just casually joss my world tree/treeway hunch as inconsistent with everything they can detect or is it the kind of thing that would require a lot more study to give an indication one way or another?
Temple Cats retain their abilities near the nine worlds (but not, IIRC, near Byzantium).
This suggests some Yggdrassil action is going on.
I'm pretty sure I suggested something similar shortly after we received that particular revelation.
Yeah we are going to have to change things, but my problem with their logic is that the expansion of the high council is going to happen anyway, only instead of it being phased in to an extent it'll instead happen all at once.Plus… there is the point that the more you dilute authority, the more people you add to the council, the harder it is to achieve a majority and the harder it is for the group as a whole to act. At present our one vote and a couple more bought with reputation can swing most decisions. Imagine having to secure a dozen votes just to break a deadlock?
I see they haven't been reading their book properlyThe conservatives have likely come to see themselves as the new High Lords of Terra (council of Asgard? Midgard?). We are the planets the Emperor charged with carrying the light of humanity until his return after all.
Thus any suggestion that we let more planets have a say in ruling is something they will oppose.
Yeah but that's the point where you begin pushing for a body with more central authority, probably growing out of the military or administratum. All the planets have enough power to feel like they can influence things and have buy in into the political process but have to acknowledge the importance and primacy of non-planetary authority at some point, eventually making them more like states in the US or provinces in some modern confederacies than separate polities connected by common cause or a common conqueror.One thing to remember is that the Imperium had a singe, centralized authority. Segmentums, sectors, even planets had their own governors with a substantial degree of autonomy but ultimately everything answered to Terra.
Part of the reason the Trust has a ruling council is because none of the members could claim, or enforce, authority over the others. However the Trust is not a federation, or a republic. It is an Imperium and there is a strong perception that it should have a central authority much like its predecessor. The conservatives have likely come to see themselves as the new High Lords of Terra. We are the planets the Emperor charged with carrying the light of humanity until his return after all.
Thus any suggestion that we let more planets have a say in ruling is something they will oppose.
Plus… there is the point that the more you dilute authority, the more people you add to the council, the harder it is to achieve a majority and the harder it is for the group as a whole to act. At present our one vote and a couple more bought with reputation can swing most decisions. Imagine having to secure a dozen votes just to break a deadlock?
FineWe never do plan votes for these particular sections - it is always voting by line on proposals.
Eh we have a good chance of giving Midgard obscene amounts of control with this, the colonies are their citizens after all, they'll be similar in thought due to culture if nothing else.If the new colonies get a vote, it becomes all the more important that we start getting those spy networks running out there. If not to infiltrate their governments, then only to prevent other core worlds from doing the same.