Reds! A Revolutionary Timeline

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Also regarding the Franco-British Empire; America being socialist and not being connected to the British market as well as not having the sword of damocles that is interest on extended credit to be repaid to America makes the UASR much less able to strongarm western Europe into decolonising than OTL. Throughout the 40s and 60s, America would repeatedly twist the arms of their now entirely dependent allies whenever they got into colonial conflicts to encourage them to back down and pull out so that America could gain access to that market and also further reduce western europe's foreign policy independence. Britain was the third superpower up until the Suez Crisis (Britain and America were in fact, deeply at odds over Israel until the JFK presidency or thereabouts) and France even without its empire was repeatedly able to piss in America's cheerios through eliminating financial and materiel dependence on the US unlike most of the rest of European NATO.

And America had this power over the empire of western Europe because they had all found themselves trapped in a mountain of debt to America over the course of two world wars and the Marshall Plan as well as the Bretton-Woods system. Which let America essentially take over most of their economies and make it very difficult for them to meaningfully oppose American policy unless they found some way to break dependency. Which was something only France really managed out of the NATO countries and they only fully broke away after switching from overt imperialism to French economic neocolonialism. Though France maintaining neocolonial economic suzerainity over much of its former empire has contributed a lot to France weathering the post-imperial era better than the UK which in OTL seems to be in an inescapable continual downward spiral of increasing global irrelevance.

It's worth noting that Britain and France outright lost only a few colonial conflicts without being strongarmed into giving up first. Britain outright crushed the Malaysian Communists and annihilated the Mau Mau and the UK was as a rule; far more practiced at rooting out and destroying insurgencies than the USA was. Very few colonial insurgencies against the British Empire actually succeeded and in a very large portion of cases that the UK withdrew from a colony; it was largely on their own terms and very often with a spiteful parting gift.

The British Empire lasted for centuries because the British state is quite good at the task of globalised malevolence and it took a very specific set of circumstances for it to fall apart the way it did without having to have the Empire pried out of its bloodied claws with force from a greater power.

Indeed in Reds!, the British Empire ascends even farther now that its most significant inter-imperialist competitor in the USA is no longer directly competing with it for a share of the world's markets and economy or domination over global financial systems. London now controls all the rules for capitalism and there's no one who can question it and the number two capitalist country; France; has essentially been annexed into the UK along with all of her imperial territories.

Western Europe's economy is now dependent on Britain's the same way it was on America's OTL; and having cut away the shackles of American debt; the British economy can thrum back to life, while Attlee's wartime and post-war changes to the system do much to ensure the house remains in order.

Britain is, for the first time in its history, a continental hegemon with western Europe now essentially vassalised to the British Empire. And it rather likes the power that comes with it. The immediate post-war period is regarded as a British golden age as Britain enjoys economic supremacy over western Europe, virtually the entirety of Africa, and most of South Asia as well as re-asserting itself over Brazil. British culture dominates western Europe and the matters of the most populated band of Europe, nearly the whole of Africa and a massive chunk of Asia and South America are heavily influenced by London.

And of the countries granted independence of sorts such as the dominions created out of Nigeria, the Raj, Egypt-Sudan; and so on; they are all too happy to help the Metropole keep the Empire in check so they get a piece of the spoils.

With the fall of the Black Eagle of Germany and the death of the bald eagle in America as the crow bursts from its corpse; the Lion's roar has never been louder. Though many of course, prefer to depict the FBU as a Griffin (an Aquilian Griffin at that; as it'd be a bit more dignified than a Rooster/Lion griffin).
 
Last edited:
Personally I've wondered about how exactly the state structure of the FBU works. There's a number of potential issues and tensions that can easily pop up, such as potential rivalry between London and Paris for primacy; are France and the UK separate self-governing entities with their own provincial jurisdictions and legal codes; or if it's a unitary state with a single parliament and whether it sits permanently in London or rotates between the capitals. I imagine we'll get more details in some future update, or maybe the details existed OTL somewhere that I've never looked for.
 
Personally I've wondered about how exactly the state structure of the FBU works. There's a number of potential issues and tensions that can easily pop up, such as potential rivalry between London and Paris for primacy; are France and the UK separate self-governing entities with their own provincial jurisdictions and legal codes; or if it's a unitary state with a single parliament and whether it sits permanently in London or rotates between the capitals. I imagine we'll get more details in some future update, or maybe the details existed OTL somewhere that I've never looked for.
There was an idea that the Parliament is split between London and Paris. (The actual capital is still under discussion)

The two countries use their respective civil codes, but share currency, military, economic and diplomatic organs.
 
I'm curious about the situation in the Middle East and Central Asia Post-WWII. I saw in the wiki that Palestine and Iran are SSRs, and Afghanistan somehow remained a kingdom (probably as a buffer, and probably remained stable because of it).

I could see Ba'athism getting backing by the Comintern in Iraq and the levant, though the Arab Nationalist components could create friction in what is supposed to be an internationalist movement. There's also the fact that Islamist ideologies like Salafism most likely still exist TTL, though without the spectacular thrashing of Arab Nationalist governments in the OTL Six-Day War, it could be the case that it remains mostly contained in Egypt-Sudan and Arabia.

Edit: Wait, the Hashemites became the ruling dynasty of Arabia? What happened to House Saud?
 
Last edited:
I'm curious about the situation in the Middle East and Central Asia Post-WWII. I saw in the wiki that Palestine and Iran are SSRs, and Afghanistan somehow remained a kingdom (probably as a buffer, and probably remained stable because of it).

I could see Ba'athism getting backing by the Comintern in Iraq and the levant, though the Arab Nationalist components could create friction in what is supposed to be an internationalist movement. There's also the fact that Islamist ideologies like Salafism most likely still exist TTL, though without the spectacular thrashing of Arab Nationalist governments in the OTL Six-Day War, it could be the case that it remains mostly contained in Egypt-Sudan and Arabia.

Edit: Wait, the Hashemites became the ruling dynasty of Arabia? What happened to House Saud?

Yes, the British backed the Hashemites instead of the Saudis ITTL:

June 30 [1921]: The British-backed forces of the Kingdom of Hejaz rout the forces of the House of Saud's Ikhwan in the Asir region

January 13 [1922]: Following raids by the Saudi Ikhwan into the British protectorate in Transjordan, the British foreign office terminates relations with the Sultanate of Nejd.

December 4 [1924]: Following the destruction of his forces by the British-trained forces of Sharif Hussein, Ibn Saud abdicates as Sultan of Nejd.

September 25 [1927]: The Treaty of Jeddah: The Kingdom of Hejaz and Sultanate of Nejd are reorganised as the Hashemite Kingdom of Arabia, with Ali bin Hussein as its first king. While the treaty extends recognition and further trade and support from the British Empire, British negotiators are steadfast at rejecting any missive towards reviving his father's claim as King of the Arab Countries.
 
Personally I've wondered about how exactly the state structure of the FBU works. There's a number of potential issues and tensions that can easily pop up, such as potential rivalry between London and Paris for primacy; are France and the UK separate self-governing entities with their own provincial jurisdictions and legal codes; or if it's a unitary state with a single parliament and whether it sits permanently in London or rotates between the capitals. I imagine we'll get more details in some future update, or maybe the details existed OTL somewhere that I've never looked for.

As per the OTL treaty of the Franco-British Union proposed by Churchill, the British Monarch would be head of State of the Franco-British Union; either as King of France as well as Great Britain and North Ireland or as Emperor of the FBU; which one is which is unclear.

All British citizens would be citizens of France and vice versa, and the French general assembly will meet in the house of commons as well for the duration of the war, an arrangement which becomes essentially permanent.

The British Pound would become the sole currency, and due to the loss of the Metropole to Petain; the British legal system essentially comes to predominate during the time of exile.

For quite some time, it is in essence; the absorbtion of France by the much greater economic might of Britain.
 
I have always wondered what's Egypt's role in the FBU block
A major power player in the Alliance of Free States, and one of the two Great Powers in the Middle East along with the Hashemites.

Also the AFS headquarters are in Alexandria in a modernized version of the ancient Lighthouse
So basically an independent nation, but one closely tied to the FBU economically and politically. IIRC, it has its own monarchy and political system, but it would have a strong anti-Communist leaning. I'd imagine the more traditional elements have more power because the elements of the Free Officers that would have supported the revolution have either been weakened by reforms or executed due to supporting the Italian invasion of Egypt.
 
I also wonder how the nonexistenxe of Pakistan affects the geopolitics of Afghanistan.

OTL, they didn't like each other because Afghanistan had territorial claims over the Balochi and Pashto-speaking regions split by the Durand Line (mostly the Pashto-speakers), and the two funnel terrorist and insurgent fighters against each other as a result of the dispute.

I'm guessing that because the provinces that make up Pakistan are still part of India ITTL, and Afghanistan is a neutral country sandwiched between two superpowers, that its king has accepted his territorial circumstances and works with what he has?
 
Last edited:
As per the OTL treaty of the Franco-British Union proposed by Churchill, the British Monarch would be head of State of the Franco-British Union; either as King of France as well as Great Britain and North Ireland or as Emperor of the FBU; which one is which is unclear.

All British citizens would be citizens of France and vice versa, and the French general assembly will meet in the house of commons as well for the duration of the war, an arrangement which becomes essentially permanent.

The British Pound would become the sole currency, and due to the loss of the Metropole to Petain; the British legal system essentially comes to predominate during the time of exile.

For quite some time, it is in essence; the absorbtion of France by the much greater economic might of Britain.

So no sop to French sensibilites ITTL with the French president being a co-equal head of state?

A major power player in the Alliance of Free States, and one of the two Great Powers in the Middle East along with the Hashemites.

Also the AFS headquarters are in Alexandria in a modernized version of the ancient Lighthouse

That sounds... expensive.
 
So no sop to French sensibilites ITTL with the French president being a co-equal head of state?
It kinda happens with the formation of a "State Council", representing each ethnicity, including the French President.

The British Monarch is head of that council though, and subsequently head of state.
 
I would love to hear the story of how the Free French were persuaded to go along with all that, however bad their bargaining position might have been.
 
I would love to hear the story of how the Free French were persuaded to go along with all that, however bad their bargaining position might have been.
The French government nearly acceded to the treaty OTL but were convinced otherwise by Petain who believed that resistance to Germany was pointless.
 
You know, I'd wonder what would happen if the UASR circa 2021 and the modern OTL United States were to somehow make contact with each other.
 
You know, I'd wonder what would happen if the UASR circa 2021 and the modern OTL United States were to somehow make contact with each other.
"How the fuck and why the fuck did everything go this badly wrong?" Many, many people from both sides, in more than one context.

Although on a personal level it would force me to be a bit less cynical about the odds of the Revolution happening in the first place and everything that came afterwards being all it was cracked up to be, neither of which I rate as all that high IRL.
 
You know, I'd wonder what would happen if the UASR circa 2021 and the modern OTL United States were to somehow make contact with each other.
UASR me in 2021: "Yeah, it looks like capitalism is quite literally going to fall apart soon enough, oh and I'm currently writing/creating music at my own leisure, and the family aren't a bunch of reactionary shits who stan the Ustase. How about you?"

2021 USA me: "I'm currently out of work, nearly broke, terrified of coming out, and Yugoslavia fell apart in the early 90's-"

*Reds!-verse Tito suddenly rises from his grave*
 
World Map 1940
A map of the World on the Brink

A quick note on China and the Civil War: Since the Chinese Civil War/Second Sino-Japanese War/Chinese Front of the World Antifascist Struggle is currently still under development, as well as the... generally messy nature of the conflict, the lines of control I've cobbled together from OTL warlord maps and the Changsha update should be considered to be entirely provisional. I wouldnt be surprised if they are contradicted in a few updates, and I will likely revise them as more information is released.

EDIT: Corrections regarding Chaco and the partition of Ireland, as well as correcting labeling errors
EDIT 2:
Added French Mandatory Assyria
Added British Mandatory Kuridstan
Expanded Soviet Armenia
Made British unofficial suzerainty over Egypt, Iraq, Nepal, and Bhutan clear
Updated Key
Added on-map labels
New occupation schema
Switched greece into an Italian Puppet Govt
 
Last edited:
The FBU ain't getting anything to Japan that the Comintern don't allow. The North Pacific is a Comintern Lake and it's not as if Australia and Venezuela are capable of challenging the might of the UASR even in the South Pacific. What's Malaysia and Indonesia's status? Are they more FBU aligned or more UASR aligned?
 
Back
Top