Hakazin
Serpent Admirer
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Well,
There hadn't been any good news in the development of the Mexican Civil War in over a month, and now there were rumors that Villa's revolutionary forces in the North were set to link up with Zapata's in the South. In spite of intense fighting, Pittsburgh and Toledo were still holding.
A new revolt started in solidarity with the American one.I'm confused here - either Mexico has been at civil war for more than 20 years, or a new revolt has begun recently without it being explicitly laid out.
Guess it is an (probably even an unofficial) flag of the Front itself, not the United States as a formally still existing entity under MacArthur.Also, I see that the National Salvation Front has a new flag. Any particular meaning there, or was MacArthur just not a fan of the Stripes?
Asami chose the design, so I can only speculate the exact reasoning, but I would think it is to separate the National Salvation Front from the USA itself, something that the reds would consider an illegitimate overthrow, so using its symbols instead of that of the USA underscores that point on the alt wikiAlso, I see that the National Salvation Front has a new flag. Any particular meaning there, or was MacArthur just not a fan of the Stripes?
Some excerpts from British press coverage of the American Civil War
As news of the reversals of fortune began streaming in, MacArthur found himself fixated on a single cable. Patton's stinging betrayal was now festering. The man he once considered his protégé had taken command of the defense of Pittsburgh, forming the Eastern Combined Antifa Group from the Spartacus League's Nat Turner Column, the Pennsylvania Red Guards, and the Bonus Army. Worse, the tide seemed to be slowly turning in the city.
Only when news came in that General Marshall, finding his headquarters surrounded, had surrendered, did MacArthur begin to appreciate the world of trouble he was in.
Everything with a byline has some sort editorial bias. I have on occasion used footnotes to point out particular in universe slantsAre all the updates drawn from in-universe (including textbooks) sources considered to be taken at face value, or should we take everything they say with varying grains of salt?
Also, had an idea for a piece of pop culture based on the latest update; feels like Reed and Foster convincing Browder to back a full revolution instead of "Constitutional Restoration" would make a great Lincoln-style film.
Also, I see that the National Salvation Front has a new flag. Any particular meaning there, or was MacArthur just not a fan of the Stripes?
Guess it is an (probably even an unofficial) flag of the Front itself, not the United States as a formally still existing entity under MacArthur.
It's the US jack. Not entirely sure why the NSF is using it, but it does have historical precedent as an American flag.
Asami chose the design, so I can only speculate the exact reasoning, but I would think it is to separate the National Salvation Front from the USA itself, something that the reds would consider an illegitimate overthrow, so using its symbols instead of that of the USA underscores that point on the alt wiki
Generally the source itself should clue you into whatever biases any in universe document has while out of universe posts can be expected to be free of such things. Some sources will be far more biased than others and like in OTL anything out of the Mail's presses should be regarded as suspect; especially if they intrude on the Mail's pet peeves. Editorials of course are generally nakedly biased, and Lord Rothermere has the biggest of axes to grind regarding America and Communism, the Anglophone left is his biggest bugbear after all. At least when he isn't being a Hitler fanboy and pursuing his harebrained scheme to become the King of Hungary because that is absolutely a thing Rothermere wanted to do and hoped Hitler and Horthy would realise this plan.Are all the updates drawn from in-universe (including textbooks) sources considered to be taken at face value, or should we take everything they say with varying grains of salt?
Also, had an idea for a piece of pop culture based on the latest update; feels like Reed and Foster convincing Browder to back a full revolution instead of "Constitutional Restoration" would make a great Lincoln-style film.
Did he write letters to Horthy or Hitler asking them to do that?At least when he isn't being a Hitler fanboy and pursuing his harebrained scheme to become the King of Hungary because that is absolutely a thing Rothermere wanted to do and hoped Hitler and Horthy would realise this plan.
He is still being a venomous snake in the White movement, but making him the head toadies was a bit unrealisticSeeing the long-awaited revolution finally happen is exciting. Also, has Charles Coughlin been replaced by someone else as MacArthur's right hand man? What's he doing now?
I was going to post a tribute giving you a verbal "Heart" just for putting him in on the Red side, under the full USA flag indicating his relative conservatism in the UASR and that he formally fought as a constitutional restorationist who merely tolerated the Red triumph. But your own post is where that tribute goes.
But Harry Truman's Minutemen (rather, the Minutemen are a bigger thing, Truman is just one of many high commanders I suppose albeit a particularly notable one) get the old US flag in full, because although they either graciously or grudgingly accepted that the world had moved on and got with the new UASR and gave it loyalty as the conservative wing of it, their particular fight was for maintaining and restoring the old Union they remained loyal to, dreaming neither of sweeping proletarian revolution nor hardline reaction. They just wanted to keep the moderate peace, and had to oppose MacArthur to do that. So that is why Truman gets Old Glory, and that is entirely appropriate to his role here and his personal character I think.I delineate the US from the NSF because the "United States" had effectively ceased to exist.
So that is why Truman gets Old Glory, and that is entirely appropriate to his role here and his personal character I think.
I gathered that Devers's group's symbol is for a formally radical and revolutionary group but your segment on his role up to and including 1933 does not mention any such affiliation, though surely there is plenty of time for that after the Battle of Chicago; MacArthur might be doomed but it is going to take a while to clean up the White mess. And he could have all sorts of casual informal connections to an existing group of radicals he pretty much absorbs into the Illinois Guard group he turned around.