Reds! A Revolutionary Timeline

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Because infrastructure in South America is terrible, the war with Nippon and Deutschland take priority, and the distances involved are enormous. The distance between Buenos Aires and Rio de Janerio is the same as the distance between Moscow and Berlin. And you have considerably worse transport infrastructure to get you there as well as considerably more foot mobile armies.

When an easy way to bring an end to the war is offered that still sees the integralist regime destroyed; it's taken so that they can refocus those resources on more important matters.
So that leaves the war mostly naval between the two; the Argentine and Brazilian navies are the largest on the (South American) continent. Of course, neither of them have the large-scale amphibious landing capabilities of the RN or WFRN, so coastal bombardment and commerce raiding would be the order of the day.
 
Last edited:
So that leaves the war mostly naval between the two; the Argentine and Brazilian navies are the largest on the continent. Of course, neither of them have the large-scale amphibious landing capabilities of the RN or WFRN, so coastal bombardment and commerce raiding would be the order of the day.
It's something like the eastern front of world war one.
 
It's something like the eastern front of world war one.
I mentioned the Chinese front, but I'm guessing the infrastructure is even worse and more sparse, so yeah, more like the WW1 Eastern front; wide area, mobile foot armies, and constantly living off the land. I can see how the atrocities can happen there.

I'm just relieved it wasn't Generalplan Ost: South American Edition. The Integralists and the Green Guard especially are still murderous slime, but they don't get to burn down entire cities.

Still, I'd imagine the Comintern Latin American states will be holding a long grudge, similar to the current issue regarding Imperial Japanese apologists and Japanese atrocities in East Asia; yes, there are elements in Japan refusing to apologize for what happened, but there are also elements in China and other states who benefit from demonizing Japan and keep the discontent fanned.
 
Is the Axis defeat still a forgone conclusion?Be more interesting if you left it up in the air...
I really don't understand the question.

What are you defining as an Axis victory?

Man in the High Castle style German-Japanese world? Outright impossible; Germany managing a landing on the mainland of America would require outright magic, conquering it is lunacy.

The New Order-esque German dominated continental Europe, conquered Britain and Japanese conquered Asia? Really far-fetched. Operation Sealion is outright impossible of course.

Nazi Germany just surviving? The thing is that the Nazis did not want a negotiated end to world war two with the Communists and the Allies were not going to give them one without including them on the table.
 
Last edited:
Is the Axis defeat still a forgone conclusion?Be more interesting if you left it up in the air...
There really isn't any way for the Axis to actually win, though, TTL or OTL. The way the war's set up at the moment the Axis has more breathing room because anticommunist western Europe isn't giving them quite the same level of side-eye as they were OTL but the way the fascist governments and economies work they have to conquer the world or else they implode.

Like, this war could very well stretch on longer and end with nukes getting dropped on Berlin before the end, but there is no way that there's anything resembling a happy end for the Axis Powers. The end of war isn't in doubt, the real question is how ugly the butcher's bill is going to be, and how that changes things going forward.
 
Like, this war could very well stretch on longer and end with nukes getting dropped on Berlin before the end,
A friendly reminder that ITTL the USAR started their not!Manhattan Project a couple of years early because they knew an all-encompassing global war against the fascists was on the horizon.

On the other hand, dropping nukes on Berlin will really rile up the nascent FBU, and it's not clear if the USAR wants to step on that particular geopolitical landmine.
 
Death of MacArthur
Death of MacArthur (2017)
1963 marks 30 years since Douglas MacArthur (Carl Reiner) had taken over Cuba and set up the exiled government of the United States. However, the stress of continued insurgency, attempts on his life, and American Havana's position as a Cold War hotspot has taken a toll on his health, along with increasingly erratic behavior, such as firing Avery Brundage, the head of the American Olympic Committee (in exile) for a disappointing showing in the 1960 Games.

In this state, policy is influenced by Attorney General Robert Kennedy (James Marsden) and First Secretary Hamilton Fish IV (Josh Brolin), who have a more liberal attitude than MacArthur. They are hampered by conservatives Secretary of War Edwin Walker (Jim Parsons), NBI Director Allen Dulles (Cedric Smith) and MacArthur's long time Vice President John S. Wood (Chris Parnell). In the meantime, MacArthur is grooming his son Arthur MacArthur IV (Fredrick Long*), recently graduated from Oxford with an English degree, to succeed him as President, comparing himself to Julius Caesar and Arthur to Augustus.

However, Wood is called to MacArthur's office one morning, and learns that MacArthur is forcing him to resign, wanting a newer face (like say, his son) to take his place. That night, MacArthur makes one final appearance at a gala, with figures including Jack Warner (Stanley Tucci), Howard Hughes (Leonardo DiCaprio), William Randolph Hearst, Jr. (BJ Novak), Meyer Lansky (Richard Dreyfuss), David Rockefeller (Jon Favarau), William Clay Ford (John Michael Higgins), and Robert's father, Joe Sr. (Bruce Dern), before retiring to his bedroom. Joe Sr. and Lansky note MacArthur's health, and discuss taking advantage, using Robert as a pawn to gain more influence.

The next day, his butler finds him in his bedroom, dead. The butler contacts a number of figures, including Bobby, Fish, Wood, Joe Sr., Walker, and Arthur. They argue for a bit, with Walker having the Presidential Palace locked down, with staff captured and interrogated, as well as a state of emergency in Havana. When it is determined that MacArthur died of natural causes, Kennedy forces Walker to lift the emergency. However, a staffer notes the conversation from last night to one of Walker's aides.

With Wood out as VP, there is significant confusion as to proper leadership. As First Secretary, Fish temporarily takes over as interim President. Walker is able to manipulate Wood into contesting that he had proper right towards the position, and that his dismissal from the Vice Presidency was part of MacArthur's addled actions. Joe wants to have his son in the position, and begins to use his extensive business and political connections to make it so. Dulles has the reluctant Arthur position himself as the true successor, per his father's wishes. All intend to use this to situate themselves as the true leader of Cuba and the "true" leader of Cuba".

Kennedy soon finds allies in David Rockefeller and brother, John III(Alan Alda), as well as Warner (an old contemporary from Joe's Hollywood days), and calls in a favor from Lansky to help sway corrupt NSF members.

Walker, meanwhile, begins to use loopholes to slowly amass more influence and prestige right under Fish's nose, and bring the other members of the Cabinet on his side. Dulles brings the staunchly conservative NSF members onto his side, claiming that Arthur MacArthur will carry on the MacArthur legacy.

British ambassador Alec Douglas-Home (Hugh Grant) informs Fish at MacArthur's funeral that the Franco-British Union would much prefer Kennedy over either Walker, who they fear will start a war with the UASR, which would spark a nuclear exchange or Arthur, who they feel is deeply unqualified and a definite puppet for Dulles.

Walker attempts to appeal to Arthur to take him from Dulles' influence and increase his own standing. Arthur declines out of mistrust for Walker. In the meantime, as his prestige increases, Walker begins to push the aged Wood out of the picture to seize power for himself. Hughes and real estate developer Fred Trump (Ryan Reynolds) also provide Walker's public campaign with significant funds. He also spreads stories of Joe's other sons: John being a communist judge, Joseph Jr. a Nazi war criminal, and recently annoited congressman Ted (Matthew Perry) a womanizer and drunkard. Dulles spreads rumors that Joe had poisoned MacArthur to place Bobby in charge, with help from mob associates. Dulles also has MacArthur's last wishes to have Arthur take over published in LifeTime Magazine.

Both Robert and Arthur tire of being manipulated. Arthur finally splits with Dulles, declining the presidency and forming an alliance with Robert, who splits with his father and his mob friends, to ensure Walker doesn't become leader. They quickly work to find a way to rid of Walker and place Kennedy as head.

Through interviews with various Walker affiliates (and some snooping), Robert learns that Walker was notorious for groping and fondling soldiers within his own guard. Under this pretext, Kennedy has Walker arrested, and an intense scene, Walker pleads guilty. Dulles, under pressure from Fish, retires as head of the NBI.

Fish formally resigned, and Kennedy takes over as full-term President, which he would hold until bowing out for the first free Cuban election in 1971. Arthur would defect to the United Republics in 1969, taking up residence in a New Hampshire dacha. Walker was sentenced to 20 years in prison, but was paroled in 1977. He would quietly live out the rest of his days in Havana before his death in 1993.
 
Finally caught up, this timeline has been so enlightening as to how a socialist system can work. Thank you all for writing it!

Also, was Death of MacArthur (2017) a Reds! Timeline version of The Death of Stalin (2017), with lots of dark humor with some somber moments?
 
Finally caught up, this timeline has been so enlightening as to how a socialist system can work. Thank you all for writing it!

Also, was Death of MacArthur (2017) a Reds! Timeline version of The Death of Stalin (2017), with lots of dark humor with some somber moments?
Yes. It isn't conveyed very well in a plot synopsis, but it is mostly a dark comedy about the death of a comical tyrant like MacArthur.
 
Also, was Death of MacArthur (2017) a Reds! Timeline version of The Death of Stalin (2017), with lots of dark humor with some somber moments?
Yes, it seems so.
Death of MacArthur (2017)
...amazing snippet...
Question. Would an OTL audience, when comparing it to Death of Stalin, find the movie a little bit on the dry and boring side?

"I mean? Duh, he is a dead dictator? But where are all the mass executions? And the darkest black humor? The extrajudicial murders by ex-patsies to secure positions? And the forced exile of the ex-dictator's family members?"

In a way, Reds! looks to me like a much gentler universe when Death of MacArthur is equivalent to the OTL Death of Stalin.
 
Last edited:
Ryan Reynolds as Fred Trump :sour: And seriously, Arthur MacArthur the 4th?! Does he like the name that much or is he that uncreative?
 
Death of MacArthur (2017)
lol 0 of 5 strs wehres the exploding corn cob pipe scene evry1 new Robert killed McArthr w/ exploding pipe lol

But seriously, that was a very nice post. Like the cast. I assume this was a UASR production?

A couple of questions; was Walker really a deep-closet homosexual as the movie implies, or was it a framejob (I'd say it's the latter, knowing the Kennedys)? Also, did Doug really fire the head of the AOC because of poor showing in Berlin '36? I mean, being an athlete in the 1930s isn't exactly the sort of person who'd be able to uproot themselves and go into exiles on a whim, and the UASR had all the athletes, selection pool, money, etc... that it would have taken a couple decades for Americuba to even stand a chance against it in sports.

EDIT: nvm, re-read it, 1960 games, not 1936.
Yes, it seems so.

Question. Would an OTL audience, when comparing it to Death of Stalin, find the movie a little bit on the dry and boring side?

"I mean? Duh, he is a dead dictator? But where are all the mass executions? And the darkest black humor? The extrajudicial murders by ex-patsies to secure positions? And the forced exile of the ex-dictator's family members?"

In a way, Reds! looks to me like a much gentler universe when Death of MacArthur is equivalent to the OTL Death of Stalin.
See my fake review :p

Honestly, though, I'd imagine a big production like this would cut down on the darker bits for mass appeal, even in the more relaxed UASR cinema.
 
Last edited:
Fierce! Magazine
Fierce! Magazine
Title:
Fierce!
Editor-in-Chief: Lila Sri Misra*
Categories: Women's Magazine, Lifestyle
Frequency: Monthly
Publisher: Sarasvati Media Group
Year Founded: 1969
Company: Sarasvati Media Group
Country: Greater Indian Commonwealth
Based In: Mumbai
Language: 10 languages (Bangla, English, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Urdu, Tamil, Telugu)
Website: Fierce!Magazine.com
Slogan: Behold the power of a woman

History:

Fierce! was originally named the Ladies' Journal, a monthly supplement for the Bombay Illustrated Press that was published in English, Hindi and Marathi. While the Journal was designed to cover women's issues such as advice columns, childcare, cooking and healthcare it soon became well known for reporting on various social and national issues considered important to women such as food and drug safety, maternal leave and workplace discrimination. The magazine would be one of the first to mention social issues such as sexual harassment, eve teasing and domestic abuse which would soon picked up by other national publications. Under Jaya Anand* (Editor-in-Chief 1969-1981) the magazine would establish itself as a serious publication dedicated to women's issues. The subscription fee and cover price of the magazine would be kept as low as possible through advertising and popular content. The magazine would refuse advertisements from tobacco and alcohol companies along with any medications not certified by local and national health departments.

Jaya Anand would retire in 1981, and Assistant Editor Khushi Mhasalkar* would become the new Editor-in-Chief. The magazine would adopt a more 'modern professional' look by including sections for book, cinema and fashion reviews along with asking for subscriber ideas for content. The magazine would also begin to include stories and poetry from women writers and would be the launching pad for several writers such as Kirtida Ritu Patil*, Apurva Sharma* and Pallavi Lata Rao*. While the modern look would help keep circulation healthy the magazine would face more and more competition from foreign and local magazines and television programs. Jaya would petition the Illustrated Press to launch the Journal in a variety of languages in order to gain more subscriptions and to market the magazine outside of urban locales and to increase the amounts of money awarded to contributors. The magazine would enlist the aid of local women in many rural villages to distribute free copies with half the regular articles and to set up lending libraries of past issues for those who could not afford the magazine. Khushi would remain Editor from 1981-1991.

By the 1990s the magazine had launched versions in ten languages but still had tough competition from other magazines, television programs and a changing demographic. After Khushi Mhasalkar's retirement the Illustrated Press would sell of the Journal to the Sarasvati Media Group, a major media conglomerate, in 1992. Under SMG, a new younger Editor-In-Chief by the name of Lila Sri Misra* would be installed an the magazine would be revamped and renamed to Fierce! in order to win younger readers. While the layout would remain the same the material would be geared to educated women from 18 to 50 and would include interviews from prominent women from a variety of professions. Fierce! would also begin to be shipped and distributed to South Asian communities across the Alliance of Free States to take advantage of the Indian Diaspora. The magazine would continue to distribute free copies in rural villages but now would include transit stops, colleges and beauty parlors. It also launched sister publications in Arabia, Ethiopia, Nigeria and the South Philippines in English and the local language. It has also gone online with its own website allowing subscribers to access past and current issues.
 
The Indian Diaspora?

Uh oh. WW2 is about to fuck India up, isn't it?


EDIT: Ignore me, I didn't actually know that this is also a thing OTL. I guess it's hard to not have a large migrant population when you're the country with the second-largest population on Earth!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top